مالیات درآمد کارآمد پرتو با توانایی های اتفاقی
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|10873||2008||25 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||17885 کلمه|
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله شامل 17885 کلمه می باشد.
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Journal of Public Economics, Volume 92, Issues 3–4, April 2008, Pages 844–868
This paper studies Pareto efficient income taxation in an economy with finitely-lived individuals whose income generating abilities evolve according to a two-state Markov process. The study yields three main results. First, when individuals are risk neutral, in any period the only individuals whose earnings are distorted are those who currently are and have always been low ability. In addition, the degree to which these perpetual low ability types have their earnings distorted decreases over time, converging to zero if the time horizon is long enough. Second, the earnings distortions are continuous with respect to the degree of risk aversion at the risk neutral solution. Third, Pareto efficient income tax systems can be time consistent even when the degree of correlation in ability types is large. The condition for time consistency suggests a novel theoretical reason why the classic equity–efficiency trade off may be steeper in a dynamic environment than previously thought.
This paper explores the nature of Pareto efficient income taxation in a dynamic economy in which individuals' income generating abilities, while persistent, may change over time. In any period, an individual can have either low or high ability and abilities evolve according to a Markov process. The government has an exogenous revenue requirement in each period and, in addition, has the distributional objective of ensuring that those individuals who start out with low ability achieve at least some target level of lifetime expected utility. The government would like to achieve its distributional and revenue raising goals efficiently, but is unable to observe individuals' income generating abilities. The analysis yields three main results concerning efficient income tax systems in this environment. First, when individuals are risk neutral, in any period the only individuals whose earnings are distorted are those who currently are and have always been low ability. This is a declining fraction of the population, converging to zero if the time horizon is long enough. In addition, the degree to which these perpetual low ability types have their earnings distorted decreases over time, also converging to zero if the time horizon is long enough. Thus, in a very strong sense, the distortions caused by efficient income tax schemes vanish over time when individuals are risk neutral. Second, when individuals are risk averse, the result that the only individuals whose earnings are distorted are those who currently are and have always been low ability no longer holds. However, earnings distortions are continuous with respect to the degree of risk aversion at the risk neutral solution. Accordingly, long run distortions converge to zero as the degree of risk aversion converges to zero. Third, in the risk neutral case, efficient income tax systems can be “time consistent” in the sense that they cannot be Pareto dominated as information about individuals' abilities is revealed over time. Specifically, there is a lower bound on the correlation in abilities such that below it the efficient tax system cannot be Pareto dominated. When the correlation of abilities is above this bound, it is governments with higher spending commitments and/or more ambitious redistributive objectives who find it harder to commit to implement efficient income tax systems. Accordingly, it is governments with more progressive agendas that will be forced to pursue their objectives with third best policies. Since these will lead to greater distortions and larger reductions in aggregate efficiency than second best policies, the result suggests that the equity–efficiency trade off may be steeper in dynamic environments than previously thought. The paper builds on a vast literature on optimal income taxation stemming from the seminal analysis of Mirrlees (1971). Indeed, the model is a dynamic version of the classic Mirrlees model with two ability types. The two-type Mirrlees model has been used extensively in the literature to illustrate the basic principles of efficient taxation (see, for example, Stiglitz, 1982 and Stiglitz, 1985a). It is particularly tractable because efficient tax systems can be characterized by maximizing the utility of high ability types subject to a target utility for low ability types, a resource constraint, and a pair of incentive constraints. This paper extends this well known model to a dynamic, stochastic environment. Even with only two ability types, introducing dynamics and allowing for the possibility that individuals' abilities change over time significantly complicates the optimal taxation problem. In the static model, the source of distortions is the government's desire to redistribute from high to low ability individuals. If the target utility level for low ability individuals is sufficiently high, high ability individuals will have an incentive to reduce their earnings to masquerade as low ability individuals. To mitigate this possibility, income tax systems must optimally screen ability types which requires distorting the earnings of low ability individuals downwards. This redistributive source of distortions remains in the dynamic model if the target utility level for those who start out with low ability is sufficiently high. However, if individuals are risk averse, an additional insurance source of distortions arises. Even individuals who start out with high ability face uncertainty about their future income generating possibilities. Ideally, the government would like all individuals to be fully insured from future ability shocks. But efficiency also requires that higher ability individuals should provide more labor. Distortions arise from the tension between these two goals. In interpreting the findings of this paper, it is important to note that the insurance source of distortions is not operative when individuals are risk neutral. Accordingly, the results for the risk neutral case are informative about the dynamic behavior of the distortions arising purely from the government's desire to redistribute from the initially high ability to the initially low ability. When individuals are risk averse, the insurance source of distortions is also present and this is why the pattern of distortions is more complex. The focus on the dynamic pattern of distortions arising from the government's desire to redistribute distinguishes this paper from much of the other work in the New Dynamic Public Finance literature.1 Papers in this literature have been primarily concerned with understanding the pattern of distortions resulting from the government's desire to provide insurance. Individuals are treated as ex ante identical and the government's problem is to maximize the expected utility of a representative agent. The redistributive source of distortions familiar from the static literature is absent in this formulation. Moreover, the literature has focused on understanding the pattern of distortions in the allocation of consumption across time and states, remaining silent on the pattern of earnings distortions. The study of the time consistency of efficient income tax systems is motivated by the work of Roberts (1984). He showed that in a dynamic Mirrlees model in which individuals' abilities were constant, optimal income tax systems are never time consistent. Distortionary taxation is necessary to screen ability types, but after individuals have revealed their abilities, the government will find it optimal to eliminate such distortions, making the original tax system non credible. However, when individuals' abilities are stochastic, residual uncertainty remains, because an individual may change type. Accordingly, the government must still screen types in the remaining periods. The natural question, therefore, is under what circumstances are efficient tax systems time consistent and this is the question the paper answers. In characterizing second best efficient income tax systems and studying their time consistency, this paper draws on the dynamic contracting literature. In particular, it follows the analytical approach employed by Battaglini (2005) to study a monopoly pricing problem with long-lived consumers whose tastes evolve according to a Markov process. It shows that his approach can be fruitfully applied to the problem of optimal income taxation. The taxation problem is somewhat more involved than the pricing problem, in part because it involves characterizing a portion of the Pareto frontier rather than simply finding the profit maximizing solution. Among other things, characterizing the frontier helps us understand the role of the government's initial spending commitments and redistributive objectives in determining the time consistency of efficient allocations. The analysis also extends Battaglini's work by investigating the continuity of optimal policies with respect to the degree of risk aversion. The organization of the remainder of the paper is as follows. The next section presents the model. Section 3 explores the properties of second best efficient allocations under risk neutrality and draws out the implications for the efficient taxation of labor income. Section 4 studies how risk aversion modifies the conclusions. Section 5 analyses the time consistency of second best efficient allocations under risk neutrality and Section 6 concludes. An Appendix contains the proofs of most of the results.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
Recognizing that individuals' income generating abilities may vary over time significantly complicates the problem of optimal taxation. First, if individuals are risk averse, an additional insurance source of distortions is introduced along-side the redistributive source of distortions from the static model. Second, and relatedly, when individuals are risk averse there are additional margins for distortions. While in the static model the only margin to be distorted is the labor–leisure choice, in the dynamic model there are also distortions in the allocation of consumption across time and states. Third, optimal tax systems can be time inconsistent. In the static model, governments just set the tax-transfer system and individuals make their labor supply decisions. In the dynamic model, governments must announce the tax treatment of both current and future earnings. But once information has been revealed by individuals' current earnings choices, the government may wish to reoptimize its system making it time inconsistent. Given the complexity of the problem, the New Dynamic Public Finance literature is making progress in a piecemeal fashion, focusing on one or two aspects at a time. The contribution of this paper is to shed light on the nature of optimal policy when there are two ability types and the insurance source of distortions is absent or very limited. In this environment, the key issue is how to efficiently screen those who start out with high ability from those who are initially low ability. Our results concerning the pattern of earnings distortions show how this efficient screening plays out over time. They build naturally on the results from the static optimal income taxation literature. When individuals are risk averse and the insurance source of distortions is present, the pattern of earnings distortions will be more complex. However, our result that earnings distortions are continuous with respect to the degree of risk aversion at the risk neutral solution provides some guidance as to the nature of optimal policy at very low levels of risk aversion. Our results on time consistency also demonstrate that the incentive governments have to renege on efficient tax systems is mitigated by the potential variability of abilities.