پژوهش اقتصاد توریسم : بررسی و ارزیابی
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|116||2012||30 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید|
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله تقریباً شامل 9706 کلمه می باشد.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Annals of Tourism Research, Volume 39, Issue 3, July 2012, Pages 1653–1682
This paper aims to provide the most up-to-date survey of tourism economics research and to summarise the key trends in its recent development. Particular attention is paid to the research progress made over the last decade in respect of approaches, methodological innovations, emerging topics, research gaps, and directions for future research. Remarkable but unbalanced developments have been observed across different sub-research areas in tourism economics. While neoclassical economics has contributed the most to the development of tourism economics, alternative schools of thought in economics have also emerged in advancing our understanding of tourism from different perspectives. As tourism studies are multi- and inter-disciplinary, integrating economics with other social science disciplines will further contribute to knowledge creation in tourism studies.
Tourism, despite the ongoing debates about its definition over the past decades, is commonly recognised as a human activity that defines the demand for and supply of its products and the usage of resources that may result in either positive or negative socioeconomic consequences at both national and international level. The significance of the economic approach and perspective to understanding this human activity is widely known. As far as both its demand and supply are concerned, tourism has distinct characteristics which set it apart from other economic activities (Stabler, Papatheodorou, & Sinclair, 2010). Studying the characteristics of tourism from the economic perspective is a relatively new area of research pioneered by Guthrie, 1961 and Gerakis, 1965, and Gray (1966). Propelled by the tremendous evolution of tourism as an economic activity over the past 50 years, there has also been a remarkable growth, in terms of number of publications, in tourism economics research. This trend has been even more pronounced since the 1990s with the establishment of Tourism Economics, a scientific journal devoted entirely to the publications of research outputs in this field. More recently, the publication of key texts on the economics of tourism, such as Dwyer et al., 2010 and Stabler et al., 2010, and Tribe (2011), has marked the maturity of tourism economics as a field of study comprising comprehensive bodies of knowledge and theoretical foundations in the context of tourism. The dynamics of tourism, as an activity and as an industry, call for continuous efforts in seeking new approaches, tools, and perspectives in order to acquire new knowledge and a greater understanding of the discipline. Therefore, it is both necessary and useful to comprehensively review the development of the research field in terms of where we were, where we are, and where we should be. Very few such endeavours have been made in this regard. Eadington and Redman’s (1991) work represents the earliest attempt to provide an overview of the developments in tourism economics. Key research areas identified in his review include demand elasticities and their modelling techniques, market structure and ownership, economic impacts, and policies. His recommendations for further research were in such directions as inter-sectoral linkages, the integration of economic models and statistical techniques for demand analysis, and the development of national and regional input-output (I-O) models for economic impact assessment. Sinclair (1998) surveys the literature over a period of two decades, highlighting some new developments, such as the system-of-equation approach to demand analysis and computable general equilibrium (CGE) modelling for economic impact assessment. These developments echo Eadington and Redman’s (1991) earlier recommendations. Tremblay (1998) focuses his review on different perspectives on industrial organisation and recommends institutional and network approaches. In addition, Sinclair (1998) directs scholars’ attention to the environmental issues related to sustainable tourism development. She highlights the fact that impact analysis was limited to the use of I-O tables, with CGE models receiving little attention, and the neglect of taxation and regulatory policy in relation to environmental issues. In another review, Sinclair, Blake, and Sugiyarto (2003) argue that research in tourism economics has been dominated by demand analysis, while little attention has been paid to the determinants of tourism supply, including different forms of tourism business integration. More recently, Dwyer, Forsyth, and Papatheodorou (2011) have provided an overview of the state of research and the key developments in tourism economics, including perspectives on the implications for research of the recent global financial crisis. In their reviews, Li, Song, and Witt (2005) and Song and Li (2008) mainly concentrate on the methodological developments in tourism demand studies. This paper aims to provide the most up-to-date survey of tourism economics research, highlighting recent developments and likely future directions. Drawing on the latest publications up to the end of 2011, mainly from key tourism journals such as Annals of Tourism Research, Tourism Economics, Tourism Management, and the Journal of Travel Research, this review tracks the historical developments in each of the key research areas, paying particular attention to the research progress made over the last decade in terms of economic approaches, methodological innovations, emerging topics, and directions for future research.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
Through half a century’s research endeavours, tourism economics has made substantial developments and has contributed significantly to knowledge creation in the broad tourism field. The special characteristics of tourism products call for new perspectives and approaches beyond the conventional economic principles applied to other industries. The research developments among various sub-subject areas are unbalanced. Demand analysis continues to dominate tourism economics studies in terms of research interests and methodological advancements. In addition to continuous endeavours in seeking more powerful statistical tools to assist new insights, further research attention should be paid to the interrelationships among international tourism demand through a more complete system which accounts for the endogeneity among the economic variables. Supply studies are diverse and often fragmented. Comparably fewer methodological innovations have been observed, but alternative approaches (e.g., agency theory and transition cost economics) to the neoclassical philosophy and cross-disciplinary perspectives (e.g., new economic geography) have emerged. Further studies should aim for a more comprehensive understanding of the complex relationships between tourism organisations, both within and across sectors, in modern tourism supply and the corresponding firm behaviour. The more advanced game theoretical approach is welcome, particularly in the context of supply chains. At the macro level, assessment of the economic impacts of tourism development continues to be a central focus, although it will take a long time for this field of research to reach its methodological maturity. Further advancements in research on the relationship between tourism development and economic development should not ignore the theoretical foundation of such studies. In the context of the increasing attention paid to sustainability, environmental issues have attracted increasing research interest. Methodological limitations with regard to environmental impact assessment and the valuation of environmental resources deserve careful attention given the policy implications of these types of research. Studies on environmental governance need to take account of the different perspectives on this issue. Due to space constraints, this review is unable to give a full coverage of the developments of tourism economics research. Many aspects and issues have been omitted, regrettably. Overall, the economic approach, especially the neoclassical economic theories, has contributed to a better understanding of tourism. Alternative economic perspectives such as new institutional economics will help to extend the boundaries of our knowledge. In the wider context of tourism knowledge creation, economics should continue to play a significant role along with other social science disciplines. The earlier observation that “many tourism researchers seem unwilling to reach across disciplinary and methodological boundaries” (Echtner & Jamal, 1997, p. 869) must be avoided. As Tribe and Xiao (2011) note, “tourism is gradually evolving from a multidisciplinary endeavor into an interdisciplinary stage of research and scholarship” (p. 22). Integrating economics with other social sciences will not only advance our understanding of tourism, but also enrich the development of tourism economics. To pursue this direction, collective effort is necessary.