تاثیر عوامل فرهنگی بر خوشه بندی قیمت: شواهدی از بازار سهام آسیا و اقیانوس آرام
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|15622||2002||26 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||12576 کلمه|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Volume 10, Issue 3, June 2002, Pages 307–332
Price clustering is the tendency of prices to be observed more frequently at some numbers than others. It increases with haziness, or imprecision, about underlying value. Most research on price clustering has been conducted in Western financial markets, where there is manifest preference for trading at round numbers. We focus on number preferences under Chinese culture. Many Chinese believe some numbers are “unlucky” and to be avoided. For instance, the number 4 is inauspicious because the Cantonese pronunciation of 4 is similar to the phrase “to die”. We first document clustering of daily closing prices on six Asia–Pacific stock markets, three with predominantly Chinese populations. Next, we fit binomial logit models within these markets to estimate the association between structural and economic factors, and culture, on price clustering. We find some support for the influence of Chinese culture and superstition on year-round number preferences of traders, but it is located solely in the Hong Kong market. Furthermore, in the Hong Kong market Chinese culture and superstition help explain the increased avoidance of the number 4 during the auspicious Chinese New Year, Dragon Boat and Mid-Autumn festivals.
Price clustering is the tendency of prices to be observed more frequently at some numbers than others. We take the view, as others have done, that clustering results from human bias and from “haziness”, or imprecision, about underlying value. For whatever reason, some numbers are more salient than others within the range of possible values, such that market agents settle on these numbers when quoting prices. Most research on price clustering have been conducted in Western asset markets and have found a marked predisposition towards trading at “round” and “even” numbers. No study to date has examined the influence on price clustering of culture per se. We focus on Chinese culture. Each number has special meaning and significance to the Chinese. Under “feng shui” and Chinese superstition, some numbers are “unlucky” and should be avoided. The number 4 is particularly inauspicious because the Cantonese pronunciation of 4 is very similar to the phrase “to die”. Thus, it is not uncommon for the Chinese to avoid buying houses or apartments with the number 4 in their address (Lip, 1992). Given that Chinese culture is known to influence property prices (Bita, 1997), it is possible that prices observed on Asian financial markets are also influenced by feng shui and Chinese superstition. The focus of our study is the cultural bias aspect of price clustering. Accordingly, we take previous research findings as given and rely on them to identify appropriate control variables; hence, we can isolate any cultural influence. We begin by documenting price clustering in six Asia–Pacific stock markets, using daily closing stock prices over the period from 1994 to 1998. Analysis of the frequency distributions of the final digit of price in each market shows that stock price clustering is prevalent in all six.1 Consistent with previous studies, prices are found to cluster at 0, 5, and the even integers. Next, we examine whether structural and economic factors help explain differences in the degree of price clustering within these markets. We find that the degree of clustering is typically higher for higher priced stocks and decreases with firm size and trading frequency. There is evidence that Chinese culture and superstition influence the number preferences of traders, but the evidence is largely confined to Hong Kong. For other countries, including those with a high proportion of ethnic Chinese, the evidence is weak. Specifically, Chinese culture and superstition appear to be significant in Hong Kong during the auspicious Chinese festivals of Chinese New Year and the Dragon Boat and Mid-Autumn festivals.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
This paper has two objectives: to document the extent of price clustering in Asia–Pacific stock markets, but more importantly, to investigate the influence of Chinese culture and feng shui superstition on the number preferences of traders in each market. Six regional markets were examined: Australia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, the Philippines, Singapore and Taiwan. These markets were chosen because they vary in economic, structural and cultural characteristics. Analysis of price clustering was conducted at two levels. First, we looked for evidence of clustering in the frequency distributions of the final or penultimate digit of price. Second, binomial logit models were fitted to analyse factors that would be expected to influence the degree of clustering, according to each of four clustering definitions and within each of the six markets. The results clearly show the pervasiveness of stock price clustering. Prices cluster at 0, 5 and the even integers. Thus, the attraction hypothesis is supported in all markets. However, it is not easy to explain why prices cluster, in terms other than customary rounding practices and the salience of whole numbers, halves, etc. Clustering at 0 and the even numbers increases with the stock's price level and decreases with the precision with which price is known. Hence, the price resolution/negotiation hypothesis is confirmed as an explanation of price clustering. However, the foreign trading influence only exists in some markets. Chinese culture and superstition appear to influence the number preferences of share traders in the Hong Kong market especially during auspicious festivals in the Chinese calendar. For instance, Chinese culture and superstition appear to result in avoidance of the unlucky number 4 during the Chinese New Year and other auspicious festivals. This cultural effect is only prevalent in Hong Kong. The effect is weak in Taiwan, while there is no evidence of cultural effects in Singapore. It remains to be seen whether this cultural effect is present in the mainland PRC markets as well. Taken as a whole, our results lend support to both the attraction and price resolution/negotiation hypotheses that were proposed by others as reasons why prices cluster. They also suggest that, while cultural factors may influence the salience of numbers and thereby price clustering in some specific markets, their effect is at best weak when compared with a more fundamental human tendency-to round to the nearest whole number.