تاثیر نیروهای اقتصاد کلان و غیر کلان اقتصادی بر بازده سهام هتل ها
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|15706||2005||16 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||6319 کلمه|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : International Journal of Hospitality Management, Volume 24, Issue 2, June 2005, Pages 243–258
This study aimed to examine the relationship between macroeconomic and non-macroeconomic variables and hotel stock returns using hotel companies listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange. The regression analysis indicated that among the macroeconomic variables (i.e., money supply, the growth rate of industrial production, expected inflation, the change of unemployment rate, and the yield spread), only money supply and the unemployment rate significantly explained the movement of hotel stock returns. On the other hand, all non-macroeconomic forces selected (i.e., presidential elections, the 921 earthquake, the 2003 Iraqi war, the outbreak of SARS, sports mega-events, the Asian financial crisis, and the 911 terrorist attacks) had significant influences on the hotel stock returns. The empirical results of this study may be used as valuable information for local and global stock investors who seek an investment opportunity in the hospitality industry.
According to the financial theory, stock prices reflect investors’ expectations about future corporate earnings (Choi et al. 1999). Stock prices are commonly known to react to economic news. A vast amount of research has focused on the impact of macroeconomic variables on stock returns (Fama, 1981; Chen et al. 1986; Fama and French, 1988; Wasserfallen, 1989; Asprem, 1989; Bulmash and Trivoli, 1991; Abdullah and Hayworth, 1993). However, studies regarding the exploratory power of non-macroeconomic variables in predicting stock returns are rare and a recent trend. Chen et al. (1986) asserted that stock prices are affected by a variety of national and international events and some, such as political and sports events, have an even more dramatic impact on stock prices than others do. It is not surprising to encounter only a handful of studies conducted on this topic in the hospitality arena. Barrows and Naka (1994) were precursors who explored the relationship between macroeconomic variables and the movement of hospitality stocks in the US market. Although some studies attempted to discover the relationship between non-macroeconomic variables, in particular sports mega-events (e.g., the Super Bowl in the US and the Olympics) and stock returns, the scope of these studies included all industry portfolios rather than the hospitality industry (Krueger and Kennedy, 1990; Berman et al. 2000). Recent events such as the SARS outbreak, the 911 terrorist attacks, and the Asian financial crisis are possible influencers on hospitality stock returns, yet no research has been conducted using these non-macroeconomic variables in the hospitality academia. According to the annual report of the Taiwan Tourism Bureau (2003), as of December 2002, Taiwan had 3309 hotels including 3222 general hotels and 87 tourist hotels. The 87 tourist hotels are divided into two groups: 25 are categorized as general tourist hotels and 62 are grouped as international tourist hotels. In general, international tourist hotels are much more upscale than general tourist hotels and general hotels, providing high-quality service. The first hotel company that made an appearance in the Taiwan stock market was Hotel Holiday Garden (international tourist hotel) in the year 1965. Since then, more numbers of hotel companies have been publicly held and their stocks have been traded in the market. This study aimed to extend the existing research, which has almost exclusively been conducted for the developed stock market of the US, to the Asian stock market, specifically the emerging Taiwan stock market. The purposes of this study were to test the financial theory regarding the effects of macroeconomic and non-macroeconomic forces using hotel stocks in the context of the Taiwan stock market and compare the significance of the two forces. The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 reviews the theoretical literature and primary empirical research efforts; Section 3 describes the data set; the regression models and results are shown in Section 4; Section 5 discusses findings with implications for hospitality investors and the last section concludes the paper with future research.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
This study enriches the hospitality finance literature where very limited research exists in light of the relationship between the macroeconomic variables and movements of hospitality stocks. This study also brings particular attention to non-macroeconomic variables such as political events, sports mega-events, financial crises, natural disasters, wars and terrorist attacks by showing that many of these factors could be as powerful as or even more powerful than macroeconomic forces. It is recommended to validate the results using stock markets of other Asian countries or countries in different continents such as South America, Europe, and Africa. Among non-macroeconomic variables used in this study, more vigorous research is recommended regarding political events and sports mega-events because they are scheduled in advance and therefore, predictable. US Gaming stocks were sensitive to federal and state legislation voting events (Chen and Bin, 2001) and Taiwan lodging stocks were responsive to presidential elections according to this study. Future research should be extended into other hospitality segments such as airlines or foodservice companies to draw a more concrete conclusion on the relationship between political events and hospitality stocks. The relationship between sports mega-events and hospitality stocks is also inconclusive. Berman et al. (2000) reported that the announcement of the 2000 Sydney Olympics affected a limited number of industry portfolios in the Australian stock market: building materials, developers and contractors, engineering and miscellaneous services. Oddly enough, the tourism industry portfolio was not one of the beneficiaries. During the actual game period, tourism stocks did not gain any positive returns either (Chen, 2002). Hospitality finance researchers should utilize upcoming international sports events such as the 2008 Beijing Summer Olympics and the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics to answer the following possible research questions: (1) the host country's hospitality stock reactions to the games, (2) the effects on the neighboring country's hospitality stocks, and (3) comparison studies on hospitality stock reactions based on the economic development of host countries—For example, it may be hypothesized that China's hospitality stocks will react more significantly than Canada's hospitality stocks. Some efforts also should be made to find what other non-macroeconomic variables can be significant determinants for hospitality and tourism stock returns and how these variables influence the returns—negatively or positively. Lastly, the empirical findings of this study should be generalized with some care because the sample was based on only one country and the number of lodging companies included in the analysis was small although the total number of time series observations (175) satisfied the Law of Large Numbers.