رهبری اخلاقی الکترونیکی برای تیم های پروژه مجازی
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|1612||2009||8 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||1 کلمه|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : International Journal of Project Management, Volume 27, Issue 5, July 2009, Pages 456–463
This paper presents a review of current literature on ethical theories as they relate to ethical leadership in the virtual business environment (e-ethics) and virtual project leadership. Ethical theories are reviewed in relation to virtual project management, such as participative management, Theory Y, and its relationship to utilitarianism; Kantian ethics, motivation, and trust; communitarian ethics, ethic of care and egalitarianism; Stakeholder Theory; and the use of political tactics. Challenges to e-ethical leadership are presented and responses to these issues discussed. The conclusion presents four propositions for future research. The purpose of this paper is to identify secondary literature on e-ethics and how this new area of business ethics may affect the leaders of virtual project teams.
The need for ethical leadership in project teams has always been important in organizations, but the need for ethical leadership in virtual project teams has become increasing relevant as businesses move toward more non-traditional and international work environments. The term e-ethics describes ethical leadership in the virtual business environment. Ethical issues for virtual team management may be different from traditional project team management, and how they might be different is still an emerging study. Virtual project teams are increasing in business today, and understanding ethical management of virtual teams is an important part of the new e-business ethics. This paper defines virtual teams, the project manager’s role as an ethical manager and leader, and the ethical responsibilities of the project manager to lay a foundation for a discussion on e-ethical project management. Ethical theories are discussed in relation to virtual project management, such as participative management, Theory Y, and its relationship to utilitarianism; Kantian ethics, motivation, and trust; communitarian ethics, ethic of care and egalitarianism; Stakeholder Theory; and the use of political tactics. Several issues surface under the topic of e-ethical leadership for virtual project teams. Among these are: unethical use of sensitive material; unethical behaviors; superficial codes of conduct; ethic of care and developing a caring environment; social isolation in the virtual community; and the lack of stakeholder involvement or dissatisfied stakeholders in project work. Responses to these issues are discussed and four recommendations for future research are made. 1.1. Definition of the virtual team Virtual teams reflect the ever-increasing non-traditional work environments of the 21st century. According to Hertel et al. , virtual teams are work groups with members collaborating from geographically distant locations, using electronic communication media, and reflecting recent trends of globalization and interdependent teamwork. Fernback  suggests that computer-mediated communications, such as project team work, “can assert victory in humanity’s ancient struggle with nature by overcoming the constraints of geographical boundaries …” (p. 39). Ariss et al.  further define the virtual team as a group of skilled individuals who “communicate via computer, phone, fax and video-conference” (p. 22). Worldwide, North America is the most active in e-business, according to McClenahen and Jusko . Ethical virtual project management has become increasingly important as the trend in virtual work teams continues. 1.2. The project manager’s role as both the ethical manager and ethical leader Project managers are often required to be both managers and leaders. Managers initiate (project initiation), administer (project planning and scope management), improve efficiency (time, cost, quality and resource management) and control (risk monitoring and procurement management) project work. Leaders innovate (project initiating processes), take risks (risk management), provide vision and direction (communication, strategies development, and goal setting) and motivate (align resources, help overcome political, bureaucratic, and resource barriers) project team members . Many of these tasks involve balancing ethical issues for the team – such as risk management, stakeholder management and resource management. Flannes and Levin  describe the different roles and leadership skills needed by project managers. The four roles they suggest are leader, manager, facilitator and mentor/coach. In addition to playing multiple roles, project managers, according to Verma , must be able to “get things done well through others” (p. 145). General management literature shows that the manager’s leadership style and competence has a direct and measurable impact on the organization’s performance . Hertel et al.’s  study correlated team effectiveness to management practices related to goal, task, and outcome interdependence. They found that the more ethical and effective the leadership of the team, the higher the quality of goal setting processes, task interdependence and the project deliverable. 1.3. Ethical responsibilities of the project manager Ethical problems can often be traced to dysfunctional project leadership and project managers are responsible for routinely reviewing the project processes for ethical challenges . Kliem  suggests that project managers must emphasize ethical behavior in all dealings with stakeholders and reduce or eliminate any conditions that might encourage unethical behavior in project work. In addition, Kliem proposes that the project manager is responsible for creating a positive atmosphere and should encourage accountability for results. Project managers, he insists, must “focus on doing the right things rather than doing things right” [10, p. 177]. Verma  re-states this as “leadership focuses on effectiveness (doing the right things) where managership focuses on efficiency (doing the things right)” (p. 218–219). As with all business, unethical behavior in project management carries with it costs, both hidden and immediate . Ethical leadership in virtual project teams, therefore, is ultimately the responsibility of the project manager.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
This paper provides a literature review that may be used as a starting point for research projects that will help define e-ethical leadership for virtual project teams and how it differs from traditional project team leadership. As we move more toward virtual organizations, we need to understand clearly leadership’s role in defining ethical leadership behavior in the virtual project environment. Ethical management of virtual project teams will improve organizations’ ability to produce and distribute products and services, increase job satisfaction and efficiencies in employees, and provide valuable leadership to move the business forward. By realizing how ethics differ in virtual teams from traditional face-to-face teams, individuals managing virtual teams will be able to provide positive, ethical leadership to virtual project teams, resulting in the leadership skills to discern moral dilemmas, prioritize values, assess risks, protect privacy, and make ethical decisions.