بررسی بین زمانی فعالیت های تجاری سرمایه گذاران خارجی در بازار سهام کره
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|16139||2009||14 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||8332 کلمه|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Volume 17, Issue 2, April 2009, Pages 243–256
In the full market-opening period of the Korean stock market (1999–2006), when foreign equity ownership reached as high as 40% of the total stock market capitalization, foreign net flows move in the same direction contemporaneously with the domestic market return, while lagged foreign flows are not followed by any significant changes in the domestic market return. On the other hand, an increase (decrease) in foreign net buy is followed by Won appreciation (depreciation) relative to the US dollar; however, the reverse relation does not hold. Throughout the entire sample period (1995–2006), foreign flows are not significantly related to stock market return volatility.
While various issues are addressed in numerous studies on the roles of foreign investors in emerging equity markets, a key issue involves how foreign investors fare as compared to domestic investors. One of the often asked questions is whether foreign investors trade differently from domestic investors. Closely related to this, the question of whether or not information asymmetry exists between foreign investors and local investors has received much attention in the literature.1 It is well documented that the onset of the Asian financial crisis in the late 1990s triggered a heated debate on the conjecture that foreign traders armed with superior information exacerbated or even instigated the crisis in the Asian financial markets including the Korean market. Ten years have passed by since the crisis hit the Korean financial market, and in 2006, foreign investments accounted for 35% of the total market capitalization after reaching a high of 40% in 2004. Foreign investors, domestic institutional investors, and domestic individual investors are the three largest shareholder groups in Korea, comprising more than 95% of total market equity in 2005. In this study, we focus on times series changes of the trading activities of foreign investors, domestic institutions, and domestic individuals from the period when the stock market was partially open to foreign investments (partial-opening period) to the complete market liberalization period free of all investment restrictions (full-opening period). The sample we use spans 12 years from 1995 to 2006, including about 8 years of the post-crisis, full-opening period. As we focus on this inter-temporal issue, we examine specifically, (1) whether foreign investors affect market returns; (2) whether foreign investors affect market return volatility; and (3) whether foreign investors affect foreign exchange rate returns. As far as we are aware, the subject of stock market volatility and foreign exchange rate returns in conjunction with international trading flows has received little attention in the literature. In terms of research methods, we employ VAR models and GARCH-M estimations. Previous studies on the role of foreign investors in the Korean stock market focus on the earlier period in our sample—the time around the Asian financial crisis. Choe et al., (2005), using an intra-day dataset of the Korean stock market for the period 1996–1998, asserts that foreign investors pay more for the stocks they purchase, and receive less for the stocks they sell for medium and large sized trades, suggesting that domestic investors have an informational edge over foreign investors.2 A study by Kim and Wei (2002) on the Korean stock market from December 1996 to June 1998 presents evidence of positive feedback trading and herding by foreign investors residing outside of Korea. Richards (2005) examines equity markets in five nations, including Korea from 1999 to 2002, and finds that foreign trading flows show positive feedback characteristics with respect to global returns as well as domestic returns, and that price impacts of these foreign flows on the domestic market returns are larger than expected.3 Several papers, such as those by Bekaert and Harvey, 1997 and Bekaert and Harvey, 2000 and Kim and Singal (2000), do address the issue of stock market volatility. These studies examine the impact on market volatility of emerging market liberalization, and find that stock market openings have an insignificant effect on market volatility. Their empirical work is largely based on the monthly return index on a representative set of stocks in each emerging market compiled by the International Finance Corporation (IFC). We complement their research by explicitly examining daily flows of foreign capital and their effect on the volatility of the value-weighted total market index for periods far beyond market openings. Moreover, by focusing on the Korean equity market, we intend to capture the country-specific effects which could be buried in a typical multi-country study, as there are significant cross-country variations. 4 We find no evidence that in the complete market-opening period, net equity purchases by foreign investors (and by domestic investors as well) are followed by a significant change in the domestic stock market index. We do find that contemporaneous (i.e. same day) foreign net flows, an insignificant variable in the partial market-opening sample, turn positive and significant in the domestic market return in the full-market opening period, reflecting the substantial presence of foreign investors in the post-crisis Korean stock market. This result on the contemporaneous term is consistent with the findings of Griffin et al., (2004) and Richards (2005) that such trading behavior is not information-driven. Similar to the foreign net flows, we find that the contemporaneous net flows of domestic institutions are positively associated with the domestic market return in the full-market opening period. Assuming that most of the foreign investors are institutional investors, the evidence on the contemporaneous flows of foreigners and domestic institutions is consistent with the hypothesis that foreign institutions and domestic institutions tend to herd when they trade contemporaneously with the market movement in a given day in the post-crisis, fully liberalized Korean stock market. With respect to the market return volatility, GARCH analyses show that in all periods, the trades by foreign investors are not related to any significant change in market volatility. Certainly, foreign investors, who currently hold about 40% of the Korean stock market capitalization, could have a substantial impact on the overall market. As in Choe et al. (1999), if we postulate price continuation and increased volatility as indicators of a destabilization effect, then the evidence in this study does not support any destabilization effect due to foreign investors' trading activities. Regarding the foreign exchange rate (Korean won/U.S. dollar) return, we find that for the full market-opening period, an increase (decrease) in foreign net buy is followed by Won appreciation (depreciation) relative to the U.S. dollar. For example, as foreign investors purchase more Korean stocks, the value of the Korean currency relative to US dollar strengthens. This result appears to reflect the significant presence of foreign investors in the post-crisis Korean stock market. However, we find little evidence that the change in the foreign exchange rate return is followed by any significant changes in the net flows of foreign investors (and domestic investors as well) in both partial- and full-market opening periods. The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the sample and data. Section 3 provides the results of VAR analyses for the full sample and sub-samples. In Section 4, we examine changes in market return volatility. Then, we conclude in Section 5.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
The major contribution of this study is in investigating the inter-temporal changes in the net buys of foreign and domestic investors in relation to the market return, market return volatility, and foreign exchange rate return across periods before and after the complete market liberalization. The evidence reveals that foreign trading flows are not followed by significant changes in the market return in a period of a few days, and that foreign flows are not associated with any significant changes in market volatility, either, despite the fact that foreign holdings have accounted for up to 40% of the total market capitalization in recent years. In the full-opening sample, the contemporaneous foreign flow is significant in the market return; however, this result does not appear to support the view that foreign trades are information based. Just like the contemporaneous foreign flow, the contemporaneous net buy of domestic institutions is positive and significant in the domestic market return in the full-opening sample. Assuming most of the foreign investors are institutional investors, this result supports the conjecture that both foreign and domestic institutions have a tendency to herd when they trade contemporaneously with the market movement in a given day in the fully-liberalized, post-crisis Korean stock market. With respect to the foreign exchange rate (Korean won/U.S. dollar) return, VAR analyses show that during the post-crisis, full-market liberalization period, an increase (decrease) in foreign net buy is followed by appreciation (depreciation) of the Korean won relative to the US dollar, whereas trading decisions by foreign investors (and domestic institutions as well) are insensitive to fluctuations in the foreign exchange rate in any period. Given the aggregate nature of the data, we could not directly investigate whether foreign investors perform better than locals in terms of trading profits. Nor can we perform a direct examination as to whether foreigners trade based on superior information, be it inside information or unique insights arising from advanced skills in analyzing publicly available data. We leave these issues to future research.