نفوذ فن آوری نوین درون کارخانه : نقش بهره وری در مطالعه کوره های تصفیه فولاد
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|18086||2012||10 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||محاسبه نشده|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Research Policy, Volume 41, Issue 4, May 2012, Pages 770–779
This paper examines intra-plant diffusion of new technology in the Japanese steel industry. The introduction of the basic oxygen furnace (BOF) was the greatest breakthrough in steel refining in the last century. Using unique panel data, the paper estimates total factor productivity by technology type, and associates the estimates with intra-plant diffusion. The paper finds that intra-plant diffusion accounts for about a half of the industry productivity growth. Large plants are likely to adopt the new technology earlier, but retain the old technology longer, than their smaller counterparts.
Diffusion of new technology has been viewed as the main driving force of economic growth. An important set of questions often raised in the literature concerns what factors determine a firm's decision to adopt a new technology. While this issue of inter-firm technology diffusion has been extensively studied, the adoption of new technology is not in and of itself sufficient for economic growth.1 For the social benefits of innovation to be realized, the outcome of an innovation must not only be adopted by a firm, but also be extensively utilized in economic activities. Productivity and outputs would not increase in response to the adoption of new technology, if the utilization of the technology remains low. As Mansfield (1963: 356) explains, the accurate measurement of the rate of intra-firm diffusion—the rate at which a particular firm substitutes a new technology for old in its production process—requires firm-level data that identify how capital is utilized by technology type. Using unique plant-level panel data, this paper analyzes the role of productivity in intra-plant diffusion, which has received little attention in previous empirical examinations. In particular, we focus on the refining furnace technology in the Japanese steel industry. In the 1950s and 1960s, many integrated steel makers updated their technology, shifting from the conventional open-hearth furnace (OHF) to the imported basic oxygen furnace (BOF). The introduction of the BOF was praised as “unquestionably one of the greatest technological breakthroughs in the steel industry during the twentieth century” (Hogan, 1971: 1543). Interestingly, the period of the rapid dissemination of BOF technology coincides with that of the remarkable growth Japan experienced in the wake of the devastation wreaked by World War II. The steel industry expanded its production more than fourfold between 1953 and 1964, making Japan the world's largest steel exporter by 1969. As we discuss in Section 2, intra-plant diffusion played a major role in BOF diffusion, resulting in substantial industry growth in the 1950s and 1960s. Restricting our study to examining refining furnace technology allows us to abstract from market structure effects in our study; virtually all steel plants faced the same market for crude steel, a homogeneous product manufactured from the refining furnaces. The nature of the market, along with the output data by technology type, allows our analysis to focus on the influence of other determinants of intra-plant technology diffusion. Our unique furnace/plant-level data set covers the inputs and outputs from each furnace type, and the timing and size of new capital installation. The data permit an estimation of the production function based on furnace technology and the measurement of the change in productivity and output growth in the intra-plant diffusion of new technology. Our estimation results indicate that intra-plant diffusion makes a significant contribution to the industry-level productivity growth, and accounts for more than 70% of the diffusion of the new-technology in terms of industry production capacity. Furthermore, the estimates indicate that differences in the productivities of new and old technologies owned by a plant is negatively correlated with the rate of intra-plant diffusion; if a new technology is more productive than an old one within a plant, the plant will shift its production process from the old to the new technology faster than it would otherwise, so as to minimize the opportunity cost of retaining the old technology. The paper also observes that large plants are likely to adopt the new technology earlier than their smaller counterparts. This finding is consistent with those found in the literature on inter-firm diffusion such as in Rose and Joskow (1990). In his survey of the literature on new technology diffusion, Geroski (2000) identifies two leading models: the epidemic and probit models. The first model, originally proposed by Mansfield (1963), predicts that the extent of use of a new technology within a plant increases with the number of years since the first adoption. Fig. 1 traces the intra-plant diffusion rate of BOF, i.e., the changes in the share of BOF in a plant's total capacity size, for each of all thirteen plants considered in the paper. Note that they are those that switched from OHF to BOF. Although the BOF share generally increased over the study period, the epidemic model does not fully explain the BOF use observed in Fig. 1; the years elapsed since the first BOF adoption, with the use of a third-order polynomial of the variable, explain about ten percent of the total variability of the BOF output share, a finding similar to that of Battisti and Stoneman (2005). In the empirical implementation on intra-plant diffusion, along with explanatory variables that are considered as proxies for the epidemic effect, we incorporate variables that feature the alternative model—the probit model, which presumes that differences in the diffusion rates reflect differences in firm and technology characteristics. Estimation of the model indicates a difference in the productivity of new and old technologies across plants, an important determinant of the intra-firm diffusion of new technology. Full-size image (35 K) Fig. 1. Diffusion of BOF capacity size (13 plants from 1957 to 1971). Figure options The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 provides an overview of the Japanese steel market after the Second World War. It describes several important features of the market that have a direct bearing on the formulation of empirical strategies and on the interpretation of quantitative results discussed in the subsequent sections. Section 3 describes our data sources and presents a method for estimating productivity of furnace technologies. The panel feature of our dataset enables us to correct for endogeneity problems when measuring productivity. Using the obtained productivity estimates, the section evaluates the extent to which the intra-plant diffusion contributed to productivity growth. Section 4 quantitatively examines the forces that drive the intra-plant diffusion pattern observed in Fig. 1. The analysis reveals that productivity difference between old and new technologies is an important vehicle in intra-plant diffusion of new technology. Section 5 discusses the relationship between productivity and both inter- and intra-plant diffusion patterns of new technology. Section 6 presents our conclusions, followed by the appendices on the data sources and estimation method used in the paper.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
In the Japanese steel industry, the share of output produced using the new technology was limited even several years after diffusion had taken place. While inter-plant diffusion was the main driver early in the overall diffusion of BOF, intra-plant diffusion became the main contributor in later years, accounting for at least half of industrial productivity growth from 1957 to 1968. This paper further analyzes the intra-plant diffusion pattern of the new technology, a topic that has been relatively neglected in the diffusion literature. By making use of available panel data that capture the adoption and use of old and new technologies used in the Japanese steel refining stage, this paper observed that large plants were likely to adopt new technology earlier, but retain old technology longer, than their smaller counterparts. This finding, not previously remarked in the literature, implies a negative relationship between plant size and the rate of intra-plant diffusion of the BOF. The estimation results indicate that productivity difference between new and old technologies play an important role in the pattern of intra-plant diffusion. If the new technology is more productive than the old one, the plant will shift its production process from the old technology to the new faster than it would otherwise, to minimize the opportunity cost of retaining the old technology. The paper also reports that larger plants are estimated to be more productive, as they might have had higher human capital levels. In addition to the above contributions, this paper observed some other important findings regarding the intra-plant diffusion of the BOF. The results of the regression of intra-plant diffusion (3) indicate the importance of learning by doing in the operation of furnace technology. The estimation results are robust to the presence of sample selection and endogeneity because of the existence of firm-specific uncertainty. This study's findings on intra-plant diffusion have important public policy implications. Analyses of diffusion policy require knowledge of whether a firm's realized intra-plant diffusion performance differs from the optimal performance, and of whether policy interventions addressing the diffusion path actually improve social welfare (Stoneman, 2001). The paper's analysis suggests that diffusion policies could be justified on the grounds that firms have insufficient information regarding the use of new technology. Our estimation results indicated that experience in furnace operation was an important determinant of intra-plant diffusion of BOF. Indeed, our analysis showed that approximately 30 percent of the variation in BOF diffusion could be explained by operational experience. If this operational experience exhibits externalities that cannot be fully accounted for by the firms themselves, there must be a need for public policy regarding intra-plant diffusion. Measuring the magnitude of the externalities that arise from the adoption and use of BOF would be the next step to understanding the need for public policy addressing technology diffusion.