یک الگوی کلان اقتصاد سنجی از لیتوانی LITMOD
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|19591||2005||13 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||محاسبه نشده|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Economic Modelling, Volume 22, Issue 4, July 2005, Pages 707–719
This paper presents a medium-sized macro-economic sectoral model of the Lithuanian economy using econometrics on a limited number of quarterly observations. A central element in the model is a 12-sector input/output table of the Lithuanian economy facilitating analyses of structural changes. The general formulation of equations is the error correction model. The paper presents a general overview of model characteristics and a few empirical results. Model properties are illustrated in a standard public consumption simulation experiment. In general, the model gives an acceptable reproduction of past changes and model properties are comparable with similar models for other countries.
This paper presents a short to medium-term macro-economic model of the Lithuanian economy “LITMOD”. Lithuania has a small open economy and is one of the countries that joined EU on 1 May 2004. The period analysed and used for the calibration of the model is the first quarter of 1995 to the second quarter of 2002, i.e., the period just before EU entry and the period characterised by the transition form a centrally planned economy to a market economy, that is, economic liberalisation, changing focus from Eastern to Western European economies and considerable structural changes. The developed model is a standard demand-driven macro-economic sectoral model in the tradition of the European national models HERMES (Commission of the European Communities, 1993), E3ME (European Commission, 1995), the Danish model ADAM (Dam, 1996 and Dam, 1986), all estimated on annual data, and the Finnish model BOF5 (Willman et al., 2000) estimated on quarterly data. However, due to data limitations, seen in relation to the models mentioned, the ambition in modelling and the use of econometrics are fairly moderate. The model operates with 12 sectors facilitating analyses of structural changes, which have been and will continue to be important for the economic development in Lithuania. Econometrics on a limited number of observations is used to calibrate the model. The limited number of observations implies that a few key long-term parameters are restricted to theoretical sound/interpretable values. However, in general, both short- and long-term parameters are estimated, i.e., instead of developing a CGE-model calibrated on 1 year, we use the limited number of observations and econometrics to calibrate a macro-economic model, including the determination of short-term dynamics. The model may be used for aggregated macro-economic forecasts, policy and structural analyses. Another use of the model is to analyse exogenous assumptions required for the simulation of different levels of growth. After a few general characteristics of the Lithuanian economy in Section 2, the model and a few empirical results are presented in Section 3. Model properties are illustrated in Section 4 presenting a standard public consumption experiment. Finally, Section 5 gives a few general conclusions.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
Although Lithuanian economy has experienced considerable structural and institutional changes during the estimation period, a fairly standard macro-economic model reasonably reproduces the past development. Two distinct conclusions from the estimations are that Lithuanian consumers are in the short-term on a very strict budget and that an explanation of the re-orientation of Lithuanian foreign trade requires additional data. However, the inclusion of a dummy in the import and export equations is a simple way to handle this effect. Finally, simulation experiments show that the overall properties of the model are comparable with similar models for other countries. However, as in other models, the estimated long-term effect of the unemployment rate on wages is relatively high and this may be a questionable effect in medium-term forecasts.