بهره وری در صنعایع با فن آوری پیشرفته چین : عدم تجانس منطقه ای و تحقیق و توسعه
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|20277||2012||15 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||9926 کلمه|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 79, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 127–141
This paper analyzes the impact of Research and Development (R&D) on the productivity of China's high technology industry. In order to capture important differences in the effect of R&D on output that arise from geographic and socioeconomic differences across three major regions in China, we use a novel semiparametric approach that allows us to model heterogeneities across provinces and time. Using a unique provincial level panel dataset spanning the period 2000–2007, we find that the impact of R&D on output varies substantially in terms of magnitude and significance across different regions. Results show that the eastern region benefits the most from R&D investments, however it benefits the least from technical progress, while the western region benefits the least from R&D investments, but enjoys the highest benefits from technical progress. The central region benefits from R&D investments more than the western region and benefits from technical progress more than the eastern region. Our results suggest that R&D investments would significantly increase output in both the eastern and central regions, however technical progress in the central region may further compound the effects of R&D on output within the region.
In 2007, China's high technology industry (consisting of, for example, the pharmaceutical sector, aviation, electronics and communication, computer and office supplies, and medical equipment and instruments) accounted for approximately 20% of manufacturing within China, but about 45% of total Chinese exports (China Statistical Yearbook on High Technology Industry  and China Statistical Yearbook ). The prominence of the high technology industry in Chinese exports is primarily because of rising labor costs in other sectors of the Chinese economy, making other industries less competitive in international markets. Hence, this industry will continue to be an important component of Chinese exports in future years. Despite the broad success of the high technology industry, there are substantial regional differences in the productivity of the high technology industry across China. In total, China has 31 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities, leading to substantial geographical differences and differences in natural resource endowments that ultimately effect the investment in and productivity of firms.1 Typically, China is divided into three broad regions — the eastern, central, and western regions. The eastern region includes 11 provinces along the east coast of China, with an area of 1,294,000 square kilometers, accounting for 13.5% of the total area of China. The eastern region is rich in resources, such as seafood, fossil fuels, iron ore and minerals. The abundance of resources and access to the coast has made the eastern region the primary region for economic development in China. The central region includes 8 provinces, with an area of 2,818,000 square kilometers, accounting for 29.3% of the total area of China. This region is rich in various metal and non-metal resources, leading primarily to the development of heavy industry. The western region includes 12 provinces, with an area of 5,414,000 square kilometers, accounting for 56.4% of the total area of China. This region has a complex terrain with limited transportation and investment to the extent that, only until recently, there has not been much development and investment in these provinces. Fig. 1 shows a map of China that clearly labels each of the three regions.2 The wide disparity in investment across each of the regions has led to a substantial disparity in GDP per capita. In the western region (specifically Guizhou), GDP per capita in 2007 was estimated to be about 6915 renminbi (RMB; Chinese currency). In Beijing (located in the eastern region), GDP per capita in the same year was about 58204 RMB (China Statistical Yearbook ). Hence, the differences in economic development across regions have led to considerable differences in population well-being. In addition to the vast divergence in overall economic development across the three regions, the past several decades have witnessed a substantial divergence in terms of the development of the high technology industry across the eastern, central, and western regions in China. In 2007, the value-added of the high technology industry in the eastern region accounted for 88.9% of the total value-added in China, while the central and western regions only accounted for 6.5% and 5.6%, respectively (China Statistical Yearbook on High Technology Industry ). Moreover, exports from the high technology industry in the eastern region accounted for 97.9% of the total high technology exports from China, while the central and western regions only accounted for 1.34% and 0.77%, respectively. That is, following other trends in Chinese investment and development, the high technology industry is almost entirely located in the eastern region of the country. In particular, research and development (R&D) is vitally important to the high technology industry. According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD ), R&D refers to “creative work undertaken on a systematic basis in order to increase the stock of knowledge, including knowledge of man, culture and society, and the use of this stock of knowledge to devise new applications.” In 2007, the R&D inventory in the high technology industry in the eastern, central, and western regions accounted for 83.7%, 6.7%, and 9.6%, respectively, of the total R&D inventory in the high technology industry in China (China Statistical Yearbook on High Technology Industry ). Furthermore, the percentages of patents in the high technology industry held in the three regions are 86.6, 6.6, and 6.8, respectively, for the eastern, central, and western regions. The broad discrepancies in R&D investments in China have considerable policy implications for Chinese development and growth. For example, because the eastern region is already highly developed, further investments in the high technology industry and R&D are likely to be more and more costly over time, as the prices of productive inputs rise. This suggests that the return on investments in the central and western regions may potentially be higher than in the eastern region. Conversely, the lack of established infrastructure in the central and western regions suggests that factors of production are likely to be cheaper, and potentially more productive than their counterparts in the eastern region. Therefore, it is not necessarily clear as to where investments in R&D will have the highest return. The goal of this paper is to estimate the relationship between R&D and the productivity of the high technology industry in China through a production function framework, and through this lens ascertain in which provinces or regions R&D investments may draw the highest returns in terms of firm productivity. Based on the fact that the regions in China are heterogeneous in terms of their economic development, social characteristics, geographical locations, and resource endowments, a standard production function framework that assumes all regions are identical cannot accurately model the relationship between R&D and the productivity of the high technology industry. Therefore, our primary approach generalizes the standard framework in order to accommodate heterogeneity in the effect of R&D on output across regions. This approach allows for more accurate estimation of the effect of R&D on firm productivity, and thus provides direction for future investments in R&D in China.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
In this paper we focus on the effect of R&D on the productivity of the Chinese high technology industry across three major geographical regions in China. Due to large regional differences in China, we use a simple generalization of a Cobb–Douglas production function to incorporate parameter heterogeneity and flexibility into a standard production function framework. We model the elasticities of capital and labor as unknown functions of R&D, one of the environmental factors that may shift the production frontier for each region. We estimate both a semiparametric model and its parametric counterpart, and find that the semiparametric model yields more intuitive results and fewer economic violations while the parametric specification is rejected by a formal statistical goodness-of-fit test. The results from semiparametric model generally show positive and significant contributions of R&D on the productivity in China's high technology industry, with the mean R&D elasticity being 0.1531. As expected, we find that the overall impact of R&D on productivity varies substantially across regions and provinces. In particular, we find that the eastern and central regions have the largest returns on R&D investments, while the central and western regions enjoy the most technical progress. This suggest that a partial reallocation of R&D investments to the central region of China is reasonable since it benefits from R&D investments more than the western region and benefits from technical progress more than the eastern region. A possible future study may employ the empirical model presented in this paper as a foundation for the investigation of regional heterogeneity in China or other countries.