یکپارچه سازی پروفایل مهارت ها و مدیریت خرید موجودی اوراق بهادار: فرصتی برای ایجاد قابلیت خرید
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|22078||2014||13 صفحه PDF||40 صفحه WORD|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : International Journal of Production Economics, Volume 147, Part B, January 2014, Pages 271–283
2. بررسی منابع براساس پروفایل مهارت ها
2.1. پروفایل مهارت و صلاحیت
2.2. مهارت ها و دانش خرید
3. مدیریت و درخواست خرید موجودی اوراق بهادار در زمینه خرید جهانی
3.1. طبقه بندی محصولات و مدل های خرید موجودی اوراق بهادار
شکل 1. ماتریس کرالجیک (اصلاح شده به واسطه کرالجیک، 1983، ص. 11).
3.2. سازمان خرید جهانی
شکل 2. پرونده های متنی بونسوا (بونسوا، 1999، ص. 38).
شکل 3. چارچوب مفهومی استراتژی خرید جهانی
شکل 4. چارچوب پردازش اطلاعات کلی
4. روش ها و طرح پژوهشی
جدول 1:پروفایل موقعیت خرید، توسط خوشه
شکل 5. جمعیت شناختی پاسخ دهندگان (n = 72)
5. نتایج نظر سنجی
5.1. خوشه 1: نوع خرید استراتژیک
5.2. خوشه 2: نوع خرید تاکتیکی
جدول 2. پروفایل مهارت ها به وسیله خوشه.
5.3. خوشه 3: نوع محصول معمول
5.4. تفاوت بین خوشه ها
شکل 6. مقایسه نمونه ها با خوشه، میانگین تمام متغیرهای مرتبط با محصول و میانگین تمام متغیرهای مرتبط با بازار ( کدگذاری معکوس متغیرهای بازار عرضه).
6. بحث و گفتگو
6.1. نحوه تفاوت الزامات مهارت ها با نوع خرید – تغییر و اندازه گیری
6.2. بحث و گفتگو: پیامدهای مدیریت خرید
جدول 4. اتخاذ نظرسنجی برای زمینه های مختلف شرکت: مراحل پیش از ایجاد پروفایل مهارت ها توسط نوع خرید
7. نتیجه گیری
Kraljic's (1983) purchasing portfolio approach holds that different types of purchases need different sourcing strategies, underpinned by distinct sets of resources and practices. The approach is widely deployed in business and extensively researched, and yet little research has been conducted on how knowledge and skills vary across a portfolio of purchases. This study extends the body of knowledge on purchasing portfolio management, and its application in the strategic development of purchasing in an organization, and on human resource management in the purchasing function. A novel approach to profiling purchasing skills is proposed, which is well suited to dynamic environments which require flexibility. In a survey, experienced purchasing personnel described a specific purchase and profiled the skills required for effective performance in purchasing that item. Purchases were categorized according to their importance to the organization (internally-oriented evaluation of cost and production factors) and to the supply market (externally-oriented evaluation of commercial risk and uncertainty). Through cluster analysis three key types of purchase situations were identified. The skills required for effective purchasing vary significantly across the three clusters (for 22 skills, p<0.01). Prior research shows that global organizations use the purchasing portfolio approach to develop sourcing strategies, but also aggregate analyses to inform the design of purchasing arrangements (local vs global) and to develop their improvement plans. Such organizations would also benefit from profiling skills by purchase type. We demonstrate how the survey can be adapted to provide a management tool for global firms seeking to improve procurement capability, flexibility and performance.
There is compelling evidence that efficient and effective supply chain management is a key success factor for corporations competing in the global marketplace (Lamming, 1993, Carter and Ellram, 2003, Cousins, 2005 and Hartmann et al., 2012), and that the development of purchasing from a tactical to a strategic function can provide sustainable competitive advantage (Ellram and Carr, 1994, Carter and Narasimhan, 1996 and Chen et al., 2004). Prior studies examine the relationships between purchasing skills and such variables as strategic purchasing (Carr et al., 2000), supplier integration and supply management performance (Eltantawy et al., 2009), organizational performance (Carr and Smeltzer, 2000 and Cousins et al., 2006), and the position of purchasing within the organization (Tassabehji and Moorhouse, 2008). Though it is not without its critics, the purchasing portfolio approach (Kraljic, 1983 and Bensaou, 1999) is widely deployed in organizations to improve purchasing performance (Gelderman and van Weele, 2003). It is used to categorize purchases according to a range of internal, product, profit and operational factors and external, supply market conditions – collectively termed ‘profit impact’ and ‘supply risk’ factors, respectively (Gelderman and Semeijn, 2006) with the aim of providing different sourcing strategy recommendations for distinctive situations. Purchasing leaders also focus closely on skills and knowledge requirements and how these vary according to organizational context, where context can be described in terms of corporate strategy, purchasing maturity, organizational structure and business context (Rozemeijer et al., 2003). Globalization, outsourcing and e-commerce are key factors driving rapid and substantial change in the status of purchasing, purchasing job roles and organizational design (Zheng et al., 2007). Various studies point to the reducing importance of what can be regarded as more technical purchasing skills and the growing importance of more generic, ‘softer’ and more strategic skills (see Zheng et al., 2007 and Eltantawy et al., 2009 for reviews). The central argument presented in this paper is that those responsible for developing and managing purchasing and supply in complex organizations should profile knowledge and skills according to ‘purchase type’, as defined using a purchasing portfolio approach, to inform organizational design and human resource development within the purchasing function. The case for this is developed from a review of relevant literature – both conceptual and empirical – and from an exploratory study of the relationships between skills and purchase situation. The paper helps to address two research gaps. First, previous studies have profiled skills in various ways, including by job role, by contrasting transactional versus relational purchasing, and by the maturity of the organization. Each approach has advantages, but they do not fit well in highly dynamic and complex settings, as typically applies in global firms. Second, despite the (admittedly brief) mention of the importance of improving purchasing skills in Kraljic's seminal article (Kraljic, 1983, p. 117), little research has been done from a purchasing portfolio perspective to understand better what purchasing skills and knowledge are needed for effective performance in which purchase situations. Therefore our first aim was to investigate empirically the relative importance of purchasing skills for distinct purchase situations. Do skills requirements vary significantly according to profit impact and supply risk, and if so how? To achieve this it was necessary: (1) to categorize purchase types; (2) to identify a set of purchasing skills; (3) to develop a skill profile for each purchase type (4) to compare and contrast these profiles. The second, broader aim was to examine critically the profiling process itself and its relevance to practice, and to propose how it might be applied to support functional development. For the survey, variables on four dimensions were deployed to describe purchasing situations (product characteristics, product cost and value, supply market and attributes of the current, main supplier), and a set of 33 purchasing skills was compiled. Using the exploratory technique of cluster analysis (Aldenderfer and Blashfield, 1984), three distinct types of purchase types were identified: strategic (n=27), tactical (n=32) and routine (n=13). The skill profiles for each cluster show important variation (for 22 skills, p<0.01). The detailed results are reported below. The review of literature on purchasing people's skills and knowledge (referred to hereafter as ‘skills’, for brevity) and their management reveals a focus on higher level skills needed among staff working in an increasingly strategic function. Little consideration is paid to skills needed for local and/or more operational purchasing. Further, though articles on skills examine their impact on performance and on intermediary factors such as function status and supplier integration (Eltantawy et al., 2009), they offer little in terms of insights on the organizational design implications of their results. On the other hand, purchasing portfolio management literature addresses the technique's use in strategic (i.e. mature) purchasing functions in complex organizations. Though the implications for organizational design are discussed (Trautmann et al., 2009b) and for personnel are recognized (Quintens et al., 2006), we found no literature which explores the relationships in any detail. In the purchasing literature, at least, if not in practice, there is a missing link: skills profiling is not connected to portfolio management, despite the prevalence of both in research and practice. This points to a key gap, and an opportunity to develop knowledge and techniques to support the design and development of complex, dynamic purchasing organizations. Here we explain how the approach used in the survey may be adapted and used by managers and for further research. The paper is organized as follows. The next section is a two part literature review focusing on skills, considering first skills profiling from a technical HRM perspective and then skills research on purchasing and supply. Section 3 is in two parts reviewing literature on the purchasing portfolio approach, and the organization of global sourcing, focusing particularly on applying the portfolio approach to the design and management of global purchasing. The methodology for the exploratory survey is set out in Section 4, followed by the results. In Section 6 results are discussed in the context of academic research, and in terms of implications for practice. Finally, conclusions are presented.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
This exploratory investigation of how purchasing skills vary by purchase type has yielded new insights into the purchasing portfolio approach and on what skills are important for effective performance in different settings. It also provides a novel approach to skill profiling which has considerable potential for supporting strategic and operational management of the purchasing function in global firms. It provides objective, quantifiable evidence, and yet is not highly resource intensive. Compared to skills profiling centered on job role, the approach developed here leverages the well-established purchasing portfolio approach to link explicitly purchasing practices and strategies with personnel's purchasing responsibilities and skills. It is not driven by legacies found in organizational structure or job design, nor in implicit values and assumptions about what makes a good purchaser. It adapts not only to the needs of those in high-profile, more strategic roles but to purchasing personnel across the firm. Furthermore, the approach revolves around the commercial characteristics of a product type, rather than its technical properties or the industry sector. Thus it can accommodate high levels of diversity – in products and people, and organizational – as found in companies operating across national and cultural boundaries. Though the survey results are not surprising, they are interesting. The clusters map well onto established categorizations, offering strong empirical support for the portfolio approach. The results provide a skills profile for each cluster with high levels of confidence in the key differences and good face validity in the resulting descriptive profiles. The major contribution of this work, however, lies in the design of the study which draws on the knowledge of ‘front-line’ staff and provides a novel way of linking skills to context, in a way which builds on and significantly extends prior research. Further research with a broader target population is recommended to generate a tool that could be deployed by purchasing leaders and HRM professionals to develop the procurement function and its personnel.