تصویب کنسرسیوم بازار های الکترونیکی B2B: مطالعه اکتشافی
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|23684||2007||33 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||محاسبه نشده|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Volume 16, Issue 1, March 2007, Pages 71–103
Despite the considerable number of electronic B2B marketplaces formed and the benefits cited as arising from their use, many have gone out of business. This exploratory study seeks to provide a qualitative exposition of the specific factors influencing the adoption of consortium-owned B2B e-marketplaces. The study is based upon case studies of twelve companies trading through three different consortium B2B e-marketplaces. Twenty-six specific factors are identified and their impact on adoption is discussed. The identification of a significant number of factors specific to this domain provides real meaning and depth to those interested in the future of e-marketplaces. In particular, the factors identified provide those that operate such e-marketplaces with a detailed and actionable understanding of the issues they should address in order to survive, and provide users or potential users of consortium marketplaces with a practical framework with which to assess individual marketplaces. The factors can also form the basis of future studies of other types of marketplaces and of quantitative studies of adoption.
Business to business (B2B) electronic marketplaces, or e-marketplaces, have been in existence for over a decade, in which time they have been used to trade a wide range of goods. The development of the Internet caused heightened interest in this type of inter-organisational system (Kaplan and Sawhney, 2000), and the number of new e-marketplaces grew rapidly in 1999 and 2000. By 2001, Laseter et al. (2001) identified 2233 e-marketplaces. This contrasts starkly with the 750 active e-marketplaces registered on the directory of trade organisation eMarket Services in mid 2006. Many early e-marketplaces failed, high-profile casualties including Chemdex, MetalSpectrum, GoFish and E-Chemicals (Miller, 2001 and Karpinski, 2001). More recently even the best-known marketplace, Covisint, has experienced difficulties (Arbin and Essler, 2005), having evolved from a collaborative venture established by leading automotive companies such as Ford, GM and Daimler-Chrysler, to one that by 2006 was independent of the automotive industry (in terms of its ownership) and that offered services to healthcare companies. These failures seem to be mirrored in relatively low levels of adoption, though quantitative data is patchy. Research by the European Commission (2004) found that across multiple industries, on average 11% of organisations used electronic marketplaces for at least part of their trading. The sectors with the highest level of adoption were transport and equipment, with 32% and 28% of organisations adopting, respectively. Textiles and healthcare were the lowest with 4% and 5% adoption rates. A number of specific marketplaces are thriving, however: for example, SupplyOn, an e-marketplace in the automotive sector, became profitable in 2003 with revenues of 18 million Euros; and in early 2005, Exostar, an e-marketplace in the aerospace industry, was supporting over 20,000 companies and conducting over 700,000 transactions every month, after making its first operating profit in 2003. There has been much speculation as to why adoption of e-marketplaces has seemed relatively slow. Wise and Morrison (2000) attributed the “sparse transaction volumes” and “low levels of revenue” to the emphasis in e-marketplace functionality on competitive bidding and on helping buyers find new suppliers. They believed that this caused marketplaces to fail to attract sellers, leading to low levels of transactions, and thus of revenue. Other authors have cited insufficiently developed standards (Albrecht et al., 2005); the characteristics of the particular vertical market (Yadav and Varadarajan, 2005); and a lack of trust between buyers and suppliers (Ratnasingam et al., 2005). There has been little systematic study, though, of this mismatch between early expectations and the experience to date. This leaves researchers and practitioners alike unsure as to how important the e-marketplace will become to business-to-business relationships, and unclear on how they can evaluate whether a given marketplace will flourish. This paper therefore reports on an exploratory qualitative study that identifies factors influencing the adoption of B2B e-marketplaces. Our focus is on consortium marketplaces as these have been hypothesised as most likely to be sustainable (Devine et al., 2001). Our method involves 25 interviews with twelve organisations that trade through three B2B e-marketplaces as well as with managers within the marketplace organisations themselves. We start with five variable groups derived from the work of Rogers (2003) and others which have been found to influence adoption across a wide range of innovations. We identify 26 sub-factors of these five variable groups that give specific meaning and depth to the variable groups within this domain. We also report on the extent to which these sub-factors influence adoption within the sample, and discuss some of the respects in which they appear to interact. This identification of the sub-factors specific to this domain may assist those that operate consortium e-marketplaces through a detailed and actionable understanding of the issues they should address in order to survive. Similarly, it provides users or potential users of such marketplaces with a practical framework with which to assess individual marketplaces and could form the basis of similar studies of other types of B2B e-marketplaces. The paper begins with a concise literature review on e-marketplaces and on diffusion of innovation theory. After reporting the method and specific sub-factors identified by the study, a broader discussion of how the cases undertaken relate to extant literature and the additional insights that this provides for the adoption of e-marketplaces is presented. Finally, implications for researchers and practitioners are drawn.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
In summary, e-marketplaces were hypothesised as vehicles which would lead to increased price competition and a commoditisation of many product groups. This led to a profusion of start-ups and whilst some have continued to operate, many have failed. To date studies of actual marketplace adoption have tended to focus on single industries and have produced an array of antecedents, barriers and benefits, leaving practising managers and those that study this domain uncertain about future adoption of e-marketplaces. We have sought to improve understanding in this domain by exploring the detailed factors influencing adoption. We have identified 26 factors influencing diffusion, summarised in Table 5. These factors are consistent with previous diffusion of innovation literature, in that they form sub-factors of four of Rogers’s (2003 p. 221) five variable groups, including five of the six most commonly identified attributes of the innovation influencing adoption. However, they also provide valuable richness as to the meaning of these factors within this domain that mean that they are practically useful both for acting managers and as a basis for further research.