دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 23992
عنوان فارسی مقاله

سیاست مکان موجودی جدید با لجستیک معکوس اعمال شده به بازارهای الکترونیکی B2C چین

کد مقاله سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی ترجمه فارسی تعداد کلمات
23992 2007 14 صفحه PDF سفارش دهید محاسبه نشده
خرید مقاله
پس از پرداخت، فوراً می توانید مقاله را دانلود فرمایید.
عنوان انگلیسی
A new location-inventory policy with reverse logistics applied to B2C e-markets of China
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : International Journal of Production Economics, Volume 107, Issue 2, June 2007, Pages 350-363

کلمات کلیدی
2 چین - لجستیک معکوس - سیاست های موجودی هماهنگ - برنامه نویسی سطح بی
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله سیاست مکان موجودی جدید با لجستیک معکوس اعمال شده به بازارهای الکترونیکی  B2C چین

چکیده انگلیسی

Based on the characteristics of consumer purchasing behavior over business-to-consumer (B2C) electronic markets in China, we consider a supply chain with one supplier, one B2C firm and multiple distribution centers (DCs) to jointly study supply chain location and inventory policies when product returns are allowed for. A new location-inventory policy is proposed and modeled as a bi-level programming problem: The upper level determines appropriate locations of third checking sites (3CS), and the lower level presents a coordinated inventory replenishment QS_R policy in light of the 3CS locations. An abstract network based on a B2C firm in China is adopted to illustrate the proposed model. We find that a QS_R policy is more effective on inventory control than the independent control policy is; 3CS added into the network improves the B2C firm's profit, and sensitivity analysis provides interesting managerial insights into the B2C firm's profit improvement in China.

مقدمه انگلیسی

The business-to-consumer (B2C) electronic market has experienced explosive growth in China in recent years. According to the 17th Annual Official Report issued by the China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC, 2006), China had 111 million internet users in January 2006, second only to the US. Among Chinese internet users, around 24.5% have some experience using the Internet to purchase books and magazines, audio/video publications, computers and electronics, clothes, mobile phones, etc. However, e-commerce sales in China as a percent of GDP still lags behind other developed countries such as Japan and US (Gibbs et al., 2003). Several factors, highlighted in literature and numerous Chinese e-commerce websites, hinder online purchasing behavior. The first factor is poor product quality (Wee and Ramachandra, 2000; Wong et al., 2004). Customers do not have confidence in the quality of online products in China. For example, customers may receive pirated or counterfeit software, a used cell phone or second-hand electronics products in place of the licensed software, new cell phone or electronic product they ordered. A second factor is security concerns (Tan and Wu, 2004). Customers are afraid that their private information will be disclosed on the Internet. A third factor is payment method (Bin et al., 2003). The use of credit cards is still very limited in China, and the validation time is lengthy, sometimes as long as 15 days. Other payment methods, all relatively inconvenient, include bank transfers, postal orders and cash on delivery. A fourth factor is delivery reliability (Wee and Ramachandra, 2000). The main delivery modes in China are regular postal delivery, express delivery, in-door delivery, and email or download for digital products. However, delivery reliability is not guaranteed; for example, customers may order some fashion clothes online, but receive the product much later than expected. A final factor is a convenient returns policy. A recent survey (Wang and Huang, 2004) showed that given the convenience to return a product they were unsatisfied with, about 40% of customers in China would like to repeatedly make purchases from the same B2C firm. In addition, 30% of potential customers without online shopping experience were interested in trying to purchase over the Internet if an appropriate returns policy existed. Another similar survey (Huangpu, 2003) also indicated that up to 80% of online users had no confidence in product returns for online products. Until recently, many products in China could not be returned after purchase. Fortunately, because of online giants like eBay and Amazon, many B2C firms in China are realizing that a returns policy plays a pivotal role in the B2C marketplace. Without a convenient returns policy, online demand and eventually the profit of a B2C firm is adversely affected. According to Beijing's new e-commerce regulations, customers now can return or exchange products (except some products such as custom-made goods, perishable items, software, and audio-visual products) within seven days of receiving the products. Unlike other developed countries, since online product return is a new business practice in China, how to design a convenient returns policy is a big concern for many B2C firms in China. A convenient returns policy may trigger more demand, thus leading to higher profit; however, designing a returns policy is a costly activity due to additional rent fees or construction costs; transportation costs and inventory holding costs. Therefore, an appropriate location and inventory policy with returns logistics needs to be designed to a B2C firm's advantage. Furthermore, electronic market in China has the following unique characteristics: (1) Many B2C firms in China, such as No.5, Salala, and Hoyojo, are not manufacturers, but drop-shippers. In other words, these B2C firms sell product over the Internet, but do not ship the product, instead DCs or suppliers ship the product, (2) the existence of third checking sites (3CS) in e-markets of China. 3CS companies are either small retail stores that sell similar products and are capable of offering a professional check for the B2C firm or professional firms that offer checking services for many different products. A 3CS does not hold any inventory for the B2C firm. In order to be qualified to return his unsatisfied product, a customer must take the product to a 3CS. The 3CS checks to make sure the product is intact and can still be sold as brand new. In the case of a professional 3CS firm, the main cost incurred is a rent fee. Motivated by the above unique characteristics of the electronic markets of China and the surveys about returns policies, in this paper we propose a new location-inventory policy for drop shipper B2C firms in China. The returns logistics in this paper considers the direct reuse of returned products, which means products returned to a suitable DC may be used to satisfy other demand, if possible. The operation of product order and returns for this kind of B2C firm is as follows: After a customer places an order online, the B2C firm transfers the order information to a nearby DC, which in turn either delivers the product to the customer, if the inventory is on hand, or places a backorder on the product. The customer, if unsatisfied with the product, can, within a specified time after receiving the product, take the product to a third checking site (3CS). If the product passes the 3CS check, the customer is given a label that verifies the 3CS check. The customer then takes the product back and contacts the DC to pick it up. Once the product is returned to the DC, the customer receives a full refund. The purpose of this paper is to present a new joint location-inventory policy catering to Chinese drop shipper B2C firms when product return is considered, which is modeled as a bi-level programming problem. The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: We briefly review some relevant literature in Section 2. Section 3 presents the model framework and basic assumptions adopted in the paper; a new policy is outlined in Section 4. More specifically, a detailed discussion of 3CS choice is addressed in the first part of Section 4; a coordinated inventory policy (QS_R) is derived in the second part; and a bi-level programming problem based on the expected profit model of the B2C firm and analysis of 4.1 and 4.2 is proposed in the last part of the section. Section 5 addresses computational issues, including calculations of optimal control parameters, and discussion of some extensions. Section 6 concludes the paper with directions for future research.

نتیجه گیری انگلیسی

In this paper, we consider a supply chain with one supplier, one B2C firm and multiple DCs to jointly study its location and inventory policy when product returns are considered. A new location-inventory policy based on B2C electronic markets in China is proposed and illustrated as an integer bi-level programming problem: The upper level presents a sorting method to determine appropriate locations of 3CS; the lower level presents a coordinated inventory policy (QS_R) to solve the one-product, multi-location inventory system with returns. The numerical results confirm that our QS_R policy outperforms the independent non-coordinated inventory replenishment policy. Detailed discussion of profit improvement of the B2C firm taking into account 3CS choice in the system is addressed by several numerical cases with combinations of different system parameters. Because it is very difficult to acquire all accurate data at current stage, we have used some estimated close-to-reality data to test our model and have performed some sensitivity analysis. However, the numerical results still provide important managerial insights to Chinese B2C firms when designing their supply chain networks: The coordinated QS_R policy is more effective than the independent inventory control policy; it is profitable for a B2C firm to consider 3CS choice in the supply chain system; and the sensitivity analysis indicates that other parameters such as fixed ordering cost, lead time and return costs have effects on the B2C firm's profit. This research can be extended in several directions. First, we need to further apply this model in real practices when more data are available. Second, the QS_R policy works very well in the case of identical distributions, but is not significant in non-identical cases. It is possible that other coordination policies may perform better than the QS_R policy for some particular cases; for example, Nielsen and Larsen (2005) argued the Q(s,S)Q(s,S) policy performs the best compared to other policies in terms of the joint replenishment inventory system. Furthermore, it should be interesting to consider lateral transshipment among different DCs in our model, i.e., comparing the performance of different inventory policies when lateral transshipments are allowed in emergencies. Third, with the booming electronic market in China, the scale of B2C firms has grown rapidly in recent years. Therefore, how to find an efficient algorithm (e.g., genetic algorithm) to integrate our two level models to handle a large-scale supply chain network is another challenging research issue.

خرید مقاله
پس از پرداخت، فوراً می توانید مقاله را دانلود فرمایید.