دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 24199
عنوان فارسی مقاله

تجزیه و تحلیل تعمیم یافته رگرسیون خطی انجمن قوانین کلاه ایمنی جهانی با نرخ مرگ و میر موتورسواران

کد مقاله سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی ترجمه فارسی تعداد کلمات
24199 2006 6 صفحه PDF سفارش دهید محاسبه نشده
خرید مقاله
پس از پرداخت، فوراً می توانید مقاله را دانلود فرمایید.
عنوان انگلیسی
Generalized linear regression analysis of association of universal helmet laws with motorcyclist fatality rates
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Accident Analysis & Prevention, Volume 38, Issue 1, January 2006, Pages 142–147

کلمات کلیدی
موتور سیکلت - ایمنی - آب و هوا - فصلی
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله تجزیه و تحلیل تعمیم یافته رگرسیون خطی انجمن قوانین کلاه ایمنی جهانی با نرخ مرگ و میر موتورسواران

چکیده انگلیسی

This study evaluates the association of universal helmet laws with U.S. motorcyclist fatality rates from 1993 through 2002 using climate measures as statistical controls for motorcycling activity via quasi-maximum likelihood generalized linear regression analyses. Results revealed that motorcyclist fatalities and injuries are strongly associated with normalized heating degree days and precipitation inches, and that universal helmet laws are associated with lower motorcyclist fatality rates when these climate measures, and their interaction, are statistically controlled. This study shows that climate measures have considerable promise as indirect measures (proxies) of motorcycling activity in generalized linear regression studies.

مقدمه انگلیسی

According to the National Center for Statistics and Analysis (NCSA) of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), recent data indicate that only about half of all fatally injured motorcyclists in the United States were wearing helmets (NCSA, 2001). While there is evidence that wearing a compliant motorcycle helmet reduces the likelihood and severity of severe head injury and death (Deutermann, 2004, NCSA, 1996, NHTSA, 2003a and Sass and Zimmerman, 2000), several states have recently relaxed motorcycle helmet laws, and helmet use has declined (NCSA, 2002). At the end of 2002, only 20 states had a universal helmet law requiring that all motorcyclists wear helmets; the remaining states, except for three, had laws requiring that some riders wear helmets ( NHTSA, 2003b). States with a universal helmet law require all motorcycle riders to wear helmets at all times while riding on public roads. Most states without a universal helmet law still require some riders to wear helmets, e.g. riders under 15, 18, 19, or 21; riders with an instruction permit or less than 1 year of experience; riders who have not completed a training course; riders without US$ 10,000 of medical insurance, etc. During the 10-year period from 1993 through 2002, 25 states never had a universal helmet law, 20 states always had a universal helmet law, and five states started with a universal helmet law but eliminated it during that decade ( NCSA, 1993–2002). To evaluate the effectiveness of universal helmet laws, one approach is to compare motorcyclist fatalities in states with a universal helmet law to those in states without it, adjusting for differences in motorcyclist activity between the states. Unfortunately, while the number of motorcycle registrations is available for individual states, the number of motorcycle miles traveled is not. Although the number of motorcycle registrations is partially related to exposure, this measure neglects variation in the amount of activity of the registered motorcycles—a key quantitative measure needed to assess the association of fatality rates with helmet laws. However, since motorcycle activity is highly seasonal, with more activity on warm or dry days than on cold or rainy days, and climates vary markedly across states in the U.S., fatalities per registered motorcycle can be compared between states with and without universal helmet laws while controlling for climate measures correlated with motorcyclist activity. In a careful study with controls for various factors known or expected to be associated with motorcyclist fatality rates, such as average temperature, precipitation, population density, alcohol use, speeding, and engine size, Branas and Knudson (2001) found no significant difference in fatality rates between states with versus without universal helmet laws from 1994 through 1996. While their findings demonstrate the importance of statistical controls in the comparison of state fatality rates, the null results raise questions about the statistical power of their study and leave open the question of a potential benefit of universal helmet laws. In a panel study spanning the 22 years from 1976 to 1997, Sass and Zimmerman (2000) reported an average 29–33% decrease in per capita motorcyclist fatalities associated with state laws mandating helmet use by motorcyclists. They also found similar results in a set of 22 separate cross-sectional single-year analyses. Of many interesting features of their study, one was the use of a climate measure, heating degree days, as both an indirect measure of motorcyclist activity as well as a factor thought to interact with motorcycle helmet usage (i.e. with more helmet usage in states with harsher climates). Their study also included many other factors in complex structural models, some of which simultaneously estimated over 80 parameters under strict covariance assumptions required by panel studies. While the strict covariance assumptions of panel studies are irrelevant to model parameter estimates, violation of the assumptions causes underestimation of standard errors of the parameter estimates, making the true likelihood of erroneously rejecting null hypotheses much greater than the nominal (α) levels. Unfortunately, as noted by Sass and Zimmerman (2000, p. 208), the available tests of such assumptions often lack sufficient power to reliably detect violations. An association of state universal helmet laws with reduced state fatality rates is likely to be hard to detect statistically for several reasons: all but three states require at least some riders to wear helmets; some riders wear helmets even when they are not legally required; motorcyclist fatalities are not only attributable to head injuries; many factors influence motorcyclist fatalities; and direct motorcyclist activity data do not exist. Statistical power – the likelihood a study will detect an existing association – is an increasing function of both the proportion of variance explained by a set of explanatory variables and the degrees of freedom for the model; however, while increasing the number of linearly independent explanatory variables increases the proportion of explained variance (with diminishing returns), it also decreases the degrees of freedom (with an accelerated effect the fewer the degrees of freedom)—which with only the 50 independent (multivariate) observations available for U.S. state comparisons, quickly costs more statistical power than is gained by additional explanatory variables. Since climate measures are strongly associated with motorcyclist activity, the strongest factor associated with fatality risk, the present study examines the association of universal helmet laws with motorcyclist fatality rates using pertinent climate measures to control for motorcyclist activity in quasi-maximum likelihood generalized linear regression analyses. While the states undoubtedly still differ in minor ways aside from climates and the presence or absence of universal helmet laws, the multitude of such independent minor factors mitigates against the likelihood of severe bias attributable to them. The analytic objective is to maintain scientific parsimony and statistical power, with minimal reliance on stringent statistical assumptions, by modeling fatality rates as a function of one explanatory variable (universal helmet law) and two climate-related activity measures (heating degree days, precipitation) along with pertinent quadratic and interaction terms. Quasi-maximum likelihood generalized linear modeling provides crucial flexibility in modeling the relation between a function of the mean and the covariates, the relation between the mean and variance, and the error distribution.

خرید مقاله
پس از پرداخت، فوراً می توانید مقاله را دانلود فرمایید.