بهینه سازی و تجزیه و تحلیل حساسیت فریم های فضایی با امکان دهی تغییر شکل بزرگ
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|25854||2006||12 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||محاسبه نشده|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Engineering Structures, Volume 28, Issue 10, August 2006, Pages 1395–1406
A procedure for sensitivity analysis used with nonlinear incremental-iterative structural analysis of frames is proposed. The sensitivity of displacement and stress are considered. The accuracy and efficiency of this method are confirmed by several examples. The method can be used for the second-order analysis and optimization design of framed structures. Practical constraints and considerations for the design of steel frames are included in the present studies such that the reported findings can be used directly for practical optimal design, which is believed to have not yet been studied or reported in literatures.
Sensitivity analysis (SA) is a useful technique for the economical design of steel structures where the serviceability deflection limit state is a consideration. Its role is to evaluate the changes in structural response due to a variation in design parameters such as displacements, stresses and frequencies. Explicitly, the response derivatives are determined with respect to the design variables of sectional parameters. The sensitivity of the structural response with respect to these sectional design variables provides the designer with valuable insight into the structural response to these design variables. Sensitivity analysis under linear analysis has been investigated extensively by many researchers. Chan  expressed the displacements of nodes explicitly in design variables using the principle of virtual work, and proposed a practical method for the optimization design of tall buildings. Adelman and Haftka  reviewed the general method for calculating the sensitivity of the static response, eigenvalues and eigenvectors, as well as the transient response. Their paper focused mainly on derivatives of the structural responses with respect to sectional variables such as cross-sectional area, second moment of area, and plate thicknesses. For slender steel space frames, the linear relationships between the member forces and displacements become invalid because of the geometrical P−δP−δ and P−ΔP−Δ and material yielding nonlinear effects. As a result, traditional sensitivity analysis methods for linear structural behavior are not applicable. The simplest method for obtaining the derivatives of the structural response with respect to a design variable is the finite-difference method in both the linear and nonlinear cases. However, the computational cost is very high and it may be hard to find the appropriate step size in specific cases. For nonlinear structural analysis, there are mainly two different types of solution method, namely the secant iterative method and the incremental-iterative method. The secant iterative method has the advantage of simplicity, in using only the secant stiffness relationships. The incremental-iterative method uses the tangent stiffness to estimate the displacement increments and secant stiffness to check the convergence. It has the general capability of traversing the limit point. A more specific comparison of the two methods has been made by Chan and Chui . Ryu and Haririan  compared the difference between the sensitivity analysis procedures for linear and nonlinear responses. They further pointed out that the incremental-iterative approach is more appropriate for the design sensitivity analysis of nonlinear structures, as the tangent stiffness matrix at the final load level can be used directly. This advantage is also reported in this paper. A general procedure for design sensitivity analysis with incremental iterative nonlinear analysis of the structural systems is proposed by Tsay and Arora  in continuum formulations, and both the geometric and material nonlinearities are included in the derivations. But their approach appears to be less suitable for the optimization of nonlinear slender frames, which is the aim of this paper. These papers laid the foundation for the design optimization of complex nonlinear structures. Xu  adopted a direct differentiation method (DDM) in the optimization of geometrical nonlinear and semi-rigid frames using the secant iteration solution method. Saka and Ulker  and Saka and Kameshki  used a pseudo-load technique to express the displacement by the element stiffness and assuming the reciprocal relationship between the displacement and the design variables from which they obtained the sensitivity of the displacement after differentiation. Pezeshk  used a similar technique, with the potential energy differentiated with respect to the design variables to obtain the sensitivity of the stiffness matrix. The error due to the lack of knowledge of the geometrical stiffness matrix will increase as the nonlinearity of the structure increases. Zhang  derived a sensitivity analysis method using the commercial software ABAQUS (5.5), but his method is only suitable for the bar and membrane elements, in which the element stiffness can be expressed in a separable form with the design variables, which is not applicable for beam–column or shell elements. From the review of optimization technique used in conjunction with nonlinear structural analysis, a sensitivity analysis method for the nonlinear framed structure suitable for use with the popular and robust incremental-iterative solution technique is not yet available in the literature. In this paper, a procedure is proposed for sensitivity analysis designed for use with an incremental-iterative analysis method of nonlinear frames. As the design is for a serviceability limit state design with a moderate load factor, only geometrical nonlinearity is considered. Several examples reported here confirmed that this proposed procedure is accurate and efficient for the incremental-iterative type of structural analysis. The sensitivity computational cost is also noted to be nominal compared with the whole solution process. The usage of the proposed sensitivity analysis in practical structural optimization with the Optimality Criteria method is illustrated by an example of the optimization of a 15-story braced steel frame.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
An accurate sizing sensitivity analysis method for geometrical nonlinear space frames and its application in practical optimal design is proposed. The method is suitable for use in conjunction with the widely used incremental-iterative solution scheme for nonlinear problems. Both the displacement and stress constraints are considered. The computational cost for the present sensitivity analysis is minimal compared to the complete nonlinear solution process by the re-use of the formulated tangent stiffness matrix. The effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed method is confirmed by two simple examples. The application of the method in practical optimal design is illustrated by an example of the optimization of a 15-story braced frame.