دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 26720
عنوان فارسی مقاله

مدل سازی سه بعدی و تجزیه و تحلیل حساسیت راکتور هیدرید فلزی چند لوله ای

کد مقاله سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی ترجمه فارسی تعداد کلمات
26720 2013 12 صفحه PDF سفارش دهید محاسبه نشده
خرید مقاله
پس از پرداخت، فوراً می توانید مقاله را دانلود فرمایید.
عنوان انگلیسی
Three-dimensional modeling and sensitivity analysis of multi-tubular metal hydride reactors
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Applied Thermal Engineering, Volume 52, Issue 1, 5 April 2013, Pages 97–108

کلمات کلیدی
هیدرید فلزی - راکتور - تجزیه و تحلیل پارامتر - مدل سه بعدی - تجزیه و تحلیل حساسیت -
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  مدل سازی سه بعدی و تجزیه و تحلیل حساسیت راکتور هیدرید فلزی چند لوله ای

چکیده انگلیسی

In order to predict heat and mass transfer characteristics of metal hydride reactors accurately, a novel three-dimensional multiphysics model was presented. In the newly established model, the velocity field of the heat transfer fluid was obtained by solving the Navier–Stokes equations or the k-ε turbulence model. The model was numerically solved using the commercial software package COMSOL Multiphysics V3.5a. Two traditional models were also solved for the reactors under the same set of conditions. A dimensionless parameter N was defined to assess the effects of neglecting the variation of heat transfer fluid temperature on the hydrogen absorption rate. The results from numerical simulation indicated that when N is greater than 0.01, the variation of heat transfer fluid temperature cannot be neglected. In this case, the newly established model was valid while the other two models were not. Moreover, it was found that the effective thermal conductivity of the metal hydride, the flowrate of the heat transfer fluid and the contact resistance were crucial factors for improving the performance of the metal hydride reactors.

مقدمه انگلیسی

Since some metal hydride materials, e.g. LaNi5, TiFe and Mg2Ni, were successfully developed, the applications of metal hydride have been immensely extended, such as hydrogen storage, heat pump, thermal energy storage, hydrogen thermal compression, isotope separation, etc [1] and [2]. The metal hydride reactors play an important role in the above systems, in which the metal hydride formation and decomposition occur. Identifying heat and mass transfer characteristics of the metal hydride reactors is the basis for the reactor design and optimization. Many researchers have established mathematical models to analyse heat and mass transfer characteristics of metal hydride reactors. El Osery [3] and Lucas et al. [4] used one-dimensional mathematical model to describe the adsorption/desorption process in the metal hydride reactor. Jemni and Ben Nasrallah [5] formulated a mathematical model for the two-dimensional transient heat and mass transfer within a metal hydride reactor based on the volume averaging method. Their results indicated the local thermal equilibrium assumption was valid and the convective heat transfer could be neglected. Kuznetsov and Vafai [6] established an analytical criteria for the validity of local thermal equilibrium, steady state and frontal model approximation. Aldas et al. [7] extended the previous model to three-dimensional model and studied heat and mass transfer in a metal hydride bed. They found that hydrogen flow significantly influenced on the temperature profile, but the overall hydride formation was not affected by hydrogen flow in the system. The effects of the radiative heat transfer were studied by Askri et al. [8]. They found that radiative effects on the sorption process were negligible in the case of the LaNi5–hydrogen system, but very important for the Mg–H2 system. Ha et al. [9] developed a two-dimensional model for unsteady heat and mass transfer in a metal hydride bed in the hydriding process. Their results showed that the higher thermal conductivity, smaller bed diameter and the presence of fins in the bed gave more enhanced heat transfer rate from the bed. Yang et al. [10] and [11] defined two key parameters, heat transfer controlled reaction rate and mass transfer controlled reaction rate, to analyse the performance of metal hydride reactors, which established a two-dimensional mathematical model to prove the validity of the parameter analysis. Chaise et al. [12] presented a criterion for quantifying the error which is made when the fluid flow is neglected. Mellouli et al. [13] developed a two-dimensional mathematical model to optimize the designs of the metal hydride storage tanks for fuel cell vehicles. Pourpoint et al. [14] investigated the thermal characteristics of the Ti1.1MnCr system using the experimental data and a basic numerical model. Veerraju et al. [15] presented a two-dimensional transient model of plate fin-and-elliptical tube type metal hydride reactors. Visaria et al. [16] formulated and solved one-dimensional and two-dimensional computational models for reactors packed with a high-pressure metal hydride (Ti1.1CrMn). The one-dimensional model was used for calculating the maximum thickness of metal hydride layer in the initial design stage. The heat exchanger's thermal and kinetic response was obtained by the two-dimensional computational model in the final design stage. However, the models in the above literatures were formulated neglecting the variation of heat transfer fluid temperature [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15] and [16]. MacDonald et al. [17] and Chung et al. [18] used one-dimensional energy equations to describe the temperature distribution of the air in the heat exchanger pipe. Freni et al. [19] presented a three-dimensional model to simulate the whole metal hydride-based hydrogen storage tank, and the computational domain included the heat transfer fluid. Krokos et al. [20] developed a detailed three-dimensional Cartesian model for a multi-tubular metal hydride tank, which included an energy balance equation for the cooling fluid. However, the above models are developed based on the assumption that the axial velocity for the heat transfer fluid is uniform and constant, but usually this assumption doesn't coincide with the practical conditions. In this paper, a novel three-dimensional multiphysics model for metal hydride reactors was presented, in which the velocity field of the heat transfer fluid was obtained by solving the Navier–Stokes equations or the k-ε turbulence model. The computational domain was the whole reactor consisting of the metal hydride bed, the heat exchanger tube wall and the heat transfer fluid. The mathematical model was solved by the commercial software package COMSOL Multiphysics V3.5a. The validity of two assumptions was investigated, i.e. the variation of heat transfer fluid temperature is negligible, as well as that the axial velocity for the heat transfer fluid is uniform and constant. A dimensionless parameter N was defined to assess the effects of neglecting the variation of heat transfer fluid temperature on the hydrogen absorption processes. The three-dimensional distribution of the reacted fraction, temperature and gas velocity in the reactors was obtained, and the effects of some important parameters on the reactor performance were discussed.

نتیجه گیری انگلیسی

In this study, a novel three-dimensional model and two traditional models for metal hydride reactors were solved using the commercial software package COMSOL Multiphysics V3.5a. The performance of metal hydride reactors during the absorption process was simulated by the three models. Moreover, a dimensionless parameter N was defined to assess the effects of neglecting the variation of heat transfer fluid temperature on the hydrogen absorption rate. The following conclusions can be drawn: 1) The dimensionless parameter N can be used to estimate the errors caused from the assumption that the variation of heat transfer fluid temperature is neglected for the metal hydride reactors. The differences among the simulation results of the three models decrease as the parameter N decreases. 2) When N is greater than 0.01, the variation of the heat transfer fluid temperature cannot be neglected. In this case, the newly established model (Model 1) was valid while the two traditional models (Model 2 and Model 3) were not. Model 2 is not recommended to simulate the metal hydride reactors because it cannot give more accurate results and needs longer computational time compared with Model 3, 3) The most effective methods of reducing the absorption completion time were enhancing the effective thermal conductivity of the hydride bed, increasing the flowrate of the heat transfer fluid, and reducing the contact conductance between the hydride bed and the heat exchanger tube wall.

خرید مقاله
پس از پرداخت، فوراً می توانید مقاله را دانلود فرمایید.