دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 32678
عنوان فارسی مقاله

آیا کمال گرایی خودانتقادی یک سابقه یا نتیجه اضطراب اجتماعی، یا هر دو است؟مطالعه سه موج طولی 12 ماهه

کد مقاله سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی ترجمه فارسی تعداد کلمات
32678 2015 6 صفحه PDF سفارش دهید محاسبه نشده
خرید مقاله
پس از پرداخت، فوراً می توانید مقاله را دانلود فرمایید.
عنوان انگلیسی
Is self-critical perfectionism an antecedent of or a consequence of social anxiety, or both? A 12-month, three-wave longitudinal study
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Personality and Individual Differences, Volume 82, August 2015, Pages 125–130

کلمات کلیدی
- کمال گرایی - انتقاد از خود - اضطراب اجتماعی - طولی - ثبات -
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله آیا کمال گرایی خودانتقادی یک سابقه یا نتیجه اضطراب اجتماعی، یا هر دو است؟مطالعه سه موج طولی 12 ماهه

چکیده انگلیسی

Cross-sectional research suggests a relationship between perfectionism and social anxiety. However, research has not examined the direction of this relationship using a longitudinal design. Perfectionism may be an antecedent or consequence of social anxiety, or both. Our study tested reciprocal relations between self-critical perfectionism (i.e., intense self-rebuke, negative reactions to perceived failures, and nagging self-doubt about actions) and social anxiety. We hypothesized that self-critical perfectionism would be both an antecedent and a consequence of social anxiety. A 3-wave, 12-month longitudinal design was used to test the hypotheses. Waves were spaced 6 months apart. Participants (N = 301 undergraduates) completed measures in the lab at Wave 1. Online questionnaires were administered for Waves 2 and 3. Self-critical perfectionism and social anxiety both displayed strong rank-order inter-individual stability. Social anxiety predicted increases in self-critical perfectionism. However, self-critical perfectionism did not predict change in social anxiety. Self-critical perfectionism was a consequence of, but not an antecedent of, social anxiety. Results suggest treatments that reduce social anxiety may also reduce self-critical perfectionism.

مقدمه انگلیسی

Social anxiety is marked by fear of social or performance situations, especially in contexts of evaluation or with unfamiliar people. Social anxiety is distinct from shyness, depression, and specific phobia (Beidel & Turner, 2007). The present study conceptualized social anxiety as lying along a continuum of severity from mild to severe. This conceptualization is consistent with evidence suggesting social anxiety is a continuous, quantitative dimension rather than a discrete, qualitative category (Ruscio, 2010). Theoretical accounts suggest individuals with social anxiety hold unrealistically high standards for performance in social situations, berate themselves for not meeting these standards or for displaying publicly-observable anxiety-related symptoms (e.g., sweating), and believe others judge them negatively as a result of their inadequate performance or display of anxiety (Beck and Emery, 1985 and Clark, 2005; Mackinnon, Battista, Sherry, & Stewart, 2014). Consistent with these accounts, empirical research suggests perfectionism is elevated in individuals with social anxiety (Frost, Glossner, & Maxner, 2010). Ample research suggests perfectionism is a multidimensional personality trait comprised of two key dimensions. The first dimension, self-critical perfectionism, involves nagging self-doubts about actions, negative reactions to perceived failures, and intense self-rebuke (Dunkley, Zuroff, & Blankstein, 2003). Self-critical perfectionism involves a family of traits (e.g., Clara, Cox, & Enns, 2007). At present, there is no single, definitive way to operationalize self-critical perfectionism. We operationalized self-critical perfectionism as self-criticism (Blatt, D’Afflitti, & Quinlan, 1976), concern over mistakes, and doubts about actions (Frost, Marten, Lahart, & Rosenblate, 1990). These three traits are usually included when operationalizing self-critical perfectionism (e.g., Clara et al., 2007). However, other authors have also included socially prescribed perfectionism (Dunkley et al., 2003), discrepancies, or dysfunctional perfectionistic attitudes (Dunkley, Mandel, & Ma, 2014) in operationalizing self-critical perfectionism. The second dimension, perfectionistic strivings, involves ceaselessly striving toward excessively high, perfectionistic goals (Stoeber & Otto, 2006). Perfectionistic strivings involves a family of traits including self-oriented perfectionism (Hewitt & Flett, 1991), high standards (Slaney, Rice, Mobley, Trippi, & Ashby, 2001), and high personal standards (Frost et al., 1990). Our study focuses on self-critical perfectionism as it represents an empirically based synthesis of several key perfectionism models (Blatt et al., 1976, Dunkley et al., 2003 and Frost et al., 1990). Moreover, traits in this family are more strongly related to social anxiety (compared to perfectionistic strivings). In fact, research indicates traits in the perfectionistic strivings family are often unrelated or inversely related to social anxiety (Alden et al., 2002 and Shumaker and Rodebaugh, 2009). Despite widespread interest in the relationship between self-critical perfectionism and social anxiety (see Alden et al., 2002), the direction of this relationship is unclear. Three models used to explain this relationship are described next. 1.1. Vulnerability models of self-critical perfectionism and social anxiety Vulnerability models suggest personality traits come before, and contribute to, psychopathology (Bagby, Quilty, & Ryder, 2008). According to this model, self-critical perfectionism places people at risk for increases in social anxiety over time and is considered an antecedent of social anxiety rather than a concomitant or a consequence. Extensive theory, but no direct evidence, supports this model. For instance, Heimberg, Liebowitz, Hope, and Schneier’s (1995) cognitive-behavioral theory of social anxiety suggests perfectionism makes individuals likely to expect negative social interactions and this results in social anxiety. No longitudinal studies have directly tested the vulnerability model. Some indirect evidence for the impact of perfectionism on social anxiety is provided by treatment research, however. In a 12-session treatment study of 107 patients with social anxiety, Ashbaugh et al. (2007) found pre- to post-treatment decreases in doubts about actions predicted pre- to post-treatment decreases in social phobia. However, this treatment study does not represent a direct test of the vulnerability model, as a deliberate effort was made to reduce the natural course of social anxiety. 1.2. Complication/scar models of self-critical perfectionism and social anxiety In complication/scar models, psychopathology is thought to come before and contribute to changes in personality (Bagby et al., 2008). This model posits psychopathology results in transient changes in personality that diminish if symptoms are alleviated (a complication effect) or to permanent changes in personality that remain even after symptoms remit (a scar effect). We focus on a complication model as our research design does not permit tests of long-term changes. According to this model, self-critical perfectionism is a consequence of social anxiety rather than an antecedent or a concomitant. Clark’s (2005) cognitive theory of social anxiety suggests people with social anxiety develop self-criticism and unrealistic expectations over time (e.g., lofty standards for performance, conditional beliefs concerning the consequences of less-than-perfect performance, and unconditional self-critical beliefs). 1.3. Reciprocal relations models of self-critical perfectionism and social anxiety Reciprocal relations models combine the vulnerability and the complication model into a single model where psychopathology and personality traits are reciprocally related. This model views self-critical perfectionism and social anxiety as interrelated variables where changes in self-critical perfectionism are related to changes in social anxiety and vice versa. Despite clear interest in the link between self-critical perfectionism and social anxiety (e.g., Ashbaugh et al., 2007 and Levinson et al., 2013), a reciprocal relations model has yet to be tested. Knowing if self-critical perfectionism is a vulnerability for social anxiety, a complication of social anxiety, or both is important to accurately conceptualizing, researching, preventing, assessing, and treating socially anxious perfectionists. However, there are presently no empirical tests of directionality or temporal precedence when it comes to the perfectionism-social anxiety link. 1.4. Advancing research on self-critical perfectionism and social anxiety Methodological improvements are needed to advance understanding of the relationship between perfectionism and social anxiety. Most research suggesting associations between perfectionism and social anxiety uses cross-sectional designs (e.g., Levinson et al., 2013), which are ill-suited to testing issues of directionality, stability, and change over time. Multi-wave longitudinal data are needed to test reciprocal relations. Our study uses a 12-month, three-wave longitudinal design that tests the interplay between self-critical perfectionism and social anxiety over time. The present study also combines a multi-wave longitudinal design with a cross-lagged analysis, thereby permitting stronger causal inferences. This approach allows us to rule out competing explanations (e.g., testing if the link between self-critical perfectionism and social anxiety is explained by the stability of self-critical perfectionism). Finally, most research on perfectionism and social anxiety is based on manifest variables (e.g., Ashbaugh et al., 2007). However, evidence suggests latent variables (such as those used in our study) provide more accurate estimates of model parameters and help to differentiate meaningful change from measurement error (Kline, 2005). In sum, our study represents a needed contribution and one of the most rigorous tests to date of the link between perfectionism and social anxiety. 1.5. Objectives and hypotheses Our goal is to clarify the relationship between self-critical perfectionism and social anxiety by testing the reciprocal relations model (see Fig. 1). Evidence suggests self-critical perfectionism and social anxiety are strongly stable (Gros et al., 2012 and McGrath et al., 2012). Thus, we first hypothesized the autoregressive paths for self-critical perfectionism (e.g., Wave 1 self-critical perfectionism → Wave 2 self-critical perfectionism) and the autoregressive paths for social anxiety (e.g., Wave 2 social anxiety → Wave 3 social anxiety) will exhibit strong rank-order inter-individual stability. Building on theory (Ashbaugh et al., 2007 and Clark, 2005), we also hypothesized reciprocal relations between self-critical perfectionism and social anxiety as seen in Fig. 1. There is a theoretical basis to expect self-critical perfectionism confers vulnerability for social anxiety. Self-critical perfectionism involves traits, such as excessive concerns about others’ evaluations and extremely negative reactions to perceived mistakes, which are viewed as part of the premorbid personality of socially anxious people (Heimberg, Liebowitz, Hope, & Schneier, 1995). Theory also suggests self-critical perfectionism may be a complication of social anxiety, with the affect, cognition, and behavior comprising social anxiety exacerbating self-critical perfectionism (Clark, 2005). Perfectionism may be a compensatory strategy used by people who are socially anxious. If they believe they will not be judged harshly when they are perfect, adopting perfectionistic standards and behaviors would be self-protective. Full-size image (20 K) Fig. 1. Hypothesized reciprocal relations model showing cross-lagged analyses. Ovals represent latent variables. Horizontal arrows represent autoregressive paths; diagonal arrows represent cross-lagged paths. Double-headed black arrows represent significant correlations (p < .05); single-headed black arrows represent significant paths (p < .05); single headed gray arrows represent non-significant paths (p > .05). Path coefficients are standardized. Unstandardized path coefficients were constrained to equality; standardized path coefficients may vary slightly.

خرید مقاله
پس از پرداخت، فوراً می توانید مقاله را دانلود فرمایید.