تجربه، بیان، و کنترل خشم در حمایت اجتماعی ادراک شده
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|33290||2005||11 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||محاسبه نشده|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Personality and Individual Differences, Volume 39, Issue 2, July 2005, Pages 391–401
The present study extended Palfai and Hart’s (1997) work on anger expression and perceived social support. One hundred and eighty-nine college student volunteers completed measures of trait anger, anger expression/control, social desirability, and perceived social support. Findings were consistent with previous studies (e.g., Johnson & Greene, 1991; Palfai & Hart, 1997) in that anger suppression, but not aggressive anger expression, was associated with reduced social support. Moreover, hierarchical multiple regressions demonstrated that anger-in predicted perceived social support, independent of social desirability and trait anger. In addition, the ability to manage one’s anger through the use of internal controls (e.g., relaxation, calming down, etc.) was associated with increased perceptions of support. Thus, regardless of one’s propensity to experience angry feelings or tendency to respond in a socially desirable manner, anger suppression and the tendency to cope with anger through effective internal controls predicted perceived social support.
A heightened propensity to experience angry feelings (i.e., trait anger) has been associated with a variety of adverse factors, including health problems, reduced self-esteem, educational and occupational difficulties, and impaired interpersonal and family relationships (Deffenbacher, 1992, Deffenbacher, 1993, Deffenbacher et al., 1996, Deffenbacher and Stark, 1992, Eckhardt and Deffenbacher, 1995 and Feshbach, 1986). Because individuals are more likely to direct their anger toward those with whom they regularly interact (Averill, 1982), it is not surprising that frequent angry feelings have interpersonal consequences. In fact, some have argued that it is impossible to define anger apart from the social context in which it occurs (Averill, 1983 and Kassinove and Sukhodolsky, 1995). Specifically, anger-prone individuals report fewer and less satisfying sources of social support than their less angry peers (Barefoot et al., 1983, Deffenbacher et al., 1996 and Hardy and Smith, 1988). In addition to trait anger, the manner in which anger is expressed appears to have important interpersonal consequences. Generally angry individuals are described by others as abrasive, confrontational, and opinionated (Deffenbacher, 1993). They report more verbal and physical antagonism toward others (Deffenbacher et al., 1986, Deffenbacher et al., 1996 and Deffenbacher and Sabadell, 1992). As Biaggio (1987) pointed out, “Angry individuals often respond, if not with overt aggression, with some hostile or angry expression (e.g., accusation, derogation, or a highly emotional display)” (p. 667). Such behavior often leads to negative interpersonal consequences because people tend to react negatively to such displays of anger (Biaggio, 1987 and Novaco, 1985). Two constructs, anger-in and anger-out, have been particularly influential in research on anger. As measured by Spielberger’s (1999) State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 (STAXI-2), anger-in refers to the tendency to suppress one’s anger, and anger-out involves the outward expression of anger in a physically or verbally aggressive manner. Both forms of anger expression have been implicated in negative health outcomes ( Gentry, 1985, Keinan et al., 1992, Siegman, 1993 and Siegman, 1994). In addition, both predict adverse anger-related consequences ( Dahlen et al., 1998 and Deffenbacher et al., 1996). Specifically, Dahlen and colleagues found that anger-in predicted negative feelings about oneself, tension, and reckless driving, while anger-out predicted verbal fights. Surprisingly, only a few studies have addressed the relationship of anger expression to social support. Johnson and Greene (1991) divided a sample of African American male adolescents (14–16 years of age) into low, moderate, and high anger-in groups. They found that the high anger-in group scored lower on several indices of perceived social support than the low anger-in group. Specifically, high suppressors reported less total social support, smaller support networks, lower availability of supportive others, greater discomfort discussing problems with family and friends, and reduced self-esteem than low suppressors. Thus, it appears that inappropriate anger suppression has adverse social correlates, at least for male African American adolescents. Lane and Hobfoll (1992) studied the relationship of irritability, state anger (i.e., the immediate experience of anger arousal), and anger-out to social support using predominately Caucasian (92%) adults recruited from pulmonary clinics and their significant others. They found that patient state anger did not have an immediate impact on supporter anger but appeared to have a cumulative effect over time. In contrast, patient anger-out had an immediate effect, increasing supporter anger measured at the same point in time. Patient irritability appeared to have both short-term and long-term effects on supporter anger. Following these studies, Palfai and Hart (1997) measured anger expression in a sample of Caucasian college students. They found that anger-in predicted reduced social support even when controlling for socially desirable responding. While anger-in predicted overall social support, tangible support, belongingness support, self-esteem support, and appraisal support, anger-out was unrelated to social support beyond social desirability. Thus, it appears that the tendency to suppress one’s anger may be more damaging to social support than aggressive anger expression. The present study sought to extend the meager literature on anger expression and social support. First, we replicated of Palfai and Hart’s (1997) study in a racially diverse sample of college students, assessing the ability of anger-in and anger-out to predict perceived social support while controlling social desirability. The racial diversity of the sample was important given prior findings of race differences in anger expression (e.g., Deffenbacher and Swaim, 1999, Johnson, 1989 and Musante et al., 1999). Second, we added a measure of trait anger to determine whether trait anger would also predict social support, and if so, to assess whether anger expression would account for additional variance in social support beyond that explained by trait anger. Third, we added the two anger control subscales of the STAXI-2 in order to measure adaptive forms of anger expression. We predicted that anger-in would be inversely related to perceived social support, independent of both social desirability and trait anger. In addition, we predicted that both forms of anger control would be positively related to social support and that anger control would explain additional variance in perceived social support not accounted for by the maladaptive anger expression scales.