تشخیص پزشکان از یک مورد با مشکلات خشم
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|33291||2005||9 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||محاسبه نشده|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Journal of Psychiatric Research, Volume 39, Issue 4, July 2005, Pages 439–447
Psychiatrists and psychologists responded to case vignettes to assess the prevalence, severity, and diagnostic confidence clinicians had concerning treating anger disordered clients compared with clients with generalized anxiety disorder. Five hundred and forty-two clinicians (a response rate of 30%) assessed one of two matched case histories by mail. One described generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and the other a case of anger disorder (AD). Cases were identical except for thoughts and affect relevant to the disorders. Both male and female versions were used. More than 95% of the participants viewed the cases they received as pathological. The disorders were rated as equally common. The clinicians reported treating equal numbers of patients with similar anger or anxiety symptoms in the past year. Although the case histories were alike in length and detail, AD participants rated their case as less complete and had lower confidence in their diagnoses. The diagnostic consensus was high for GAD clinicians, but low for AD. Forty-three percent of participants selected an Axis II diagnosis for AD, compared with 3% for GAD. Clinicians appeared to encounter patients with chronic anger about as frequently as they see GAD, but they displayed diagnostic confusion and bias toward personality disorder diagnoses when presented with the anger symptoms. The findings support the development of a diagnostic category for primary anger. The wide dispersion of diagnoses for anger underscores the need for focused differential assessment.
Over the past two decades several authors have proposed a disorder with frequent, intense and enduring anger resulting in destructive personal and social effects as its primary symptom (e.g., DiGiuseppe and Tafrate, 1994, DiGiuseppe et al., 1993 and Hecker and Lunde, 1985; Eckhardt and Deffenbacher, 1995 (pp. 1–26); Novaco, 1985). Anger can interfere with psychological adjustment, problem solving and performance (Lazarus, 1991), instigate aggression and violence (Maiuro et al., 1988), lead to physiological reactions that contribute to coronary artery disease (Matthews and Hayes, 1986) and other medical disorders (such as hypertension, Diamond, 1982). In support of this anger disorder thesis, clinical case reports of anger-related affective disorders have been published (e.g., Fava et al., 1990, Kaufmann and Wagner, 1972, Smith, 1973 and Novaco, 1985). Spielberger and DiGiuseppe have developed anger assessment instruments (DiGiuseppe and Tafrate, 2004, Spielberger, 1988 and Spielberger, 1999). Significant research exists supporting the destructive nature of anger (DiGiuseppe and Tafrate, in press). Clinical treatments, based primarily on cognitive-behavioral protocols, are effective treatments for disturbed anger (DiGiuseppe and Tafrate, 2003). Specifically, Deffenbacher and colleagues have evaluated cognitive, relaxation, behavioral skills, and combined treatment protocols on angry clients with all treatments producing equivalent results (Hazaleus and Deffenbacher, 1986 and Deffenbachera and Stark, 1992). Despite this growing body of literature, anger research is sparse and no official diagnostic category or criteria presently exist. The most recent Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV, American Psychiatric Association, 1994) contains no category for anger disorders, and lists anger, irritability or hostility only as possible criteria for several disorders. Severe, episodic aggression falls under the diagnosis of Intermittent Explosive Disorder but this disorder refers to irresistible “impulse” rather than anger, and requires serious assaults or destruction of property for diagnosis. Most theorists do not suggest that all experiences of anger are necessarily dysfunctional (e.g., Averill, 1983, Deffenbacher, 1994, Novaco, 1985 and Rothenberg, 1971). To constitute a disorder, the frequency, intensity, or duration must cause harmful or distressing consequences. These include effects that are not observable, such as disruption of cognitive processes, prolonged emotional upset and impairment of health, or might include observable or aggressive behaviors, such as physical injury to self or others, or damage to property or relationships (Deffenbacher, 1994 and Novaco, 1985). Anger treatment research has been conducted within a diagnostic vacuum, raising important questions. This study assessed the frequency with which clients present with anger issues to clinicians as the primary symptom, the severity of disturbance that clinicians perceive for anger and anxiety disordered clients, and the diagnostic confidence and reliability for anger or anxiety symptoms presented in a vignette. We also wanted to explore whether clinicians would report treating equal numbers of patients who present anger and anxiety as the primary symptom. Likewise, the number of clinicians who view each case as pathological would be equivalent, as would be the evaluation of the severity of symptoms (GAF). Clinicians would also generate more Axis I and Axis II diagnoses for the anger disordered vignettes, a sign of lower reliability. It was also hypothesized that the lack of an anger diagnosis would result in clinicians having difficulty diagnosing anger, which would lead them to rating the case as incomplete and having less confidence in their conclusions. Previous research on anger diagnosis has not explored whether a professional’s or a client’s gender affect diagnosis, therefore, these variables were examined.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
This study suggests that patients who display chronic, dysfunctional anger as a primary symptom are common and are treated frequently. Currently, no official diagnosis for such cases exists, and this void appears to hinder the assessment process. When confronted with a case of primary anxiety, clinicians have the advantage of a well-researched diagnostic category that helps in the exploration and differentiation process. In contrast, when patients with chronic anger seek treatment, clinicians must explore a wide range of possible diagnoses for which anger may be only a secondary, nonessential criterion. After doing so, they may find no appropriate diagnosis. The spontaneous comments of psychiatrists and psychologists in this study revealed interest in an anger-focused diagnosis for cases of chronic anger that cannot be explained by another disorder, and the results support the view that such a diagnostic category would aid in assessment and treatment planning. An anger disorder must be differentiated from other disorders that sometimes include irritability or anger as a presenting symptom.