تاثیر بروز خشم بر بهبود زخم
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|33382||2008||10 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||8136 کلمه|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, Volume 22, Issue 5, July 2008, Pages 699–708
Certain patterns of anger expression have been associated with maladaptive alterations in cortisol secretion, immune functioning, and surgical recovery. We hypothesized that outward and inward anger expression and lack of anger control would be associated with delayed wound healing. A sample of 98 community-dwelling participants received standardized blister wounds on their non-dominant forearm. After blistering, the wounds were monitored daily for 8 days to assess speed of repair. Logistic regression was used to distinguish fast and slow healers based on their anger expression pattern. Individuals exhibiting lower levels of anger control were more likely to be categorized as slow healers. The anger control variable predicted wound repair over and above differences in hostility, negative affectivity, social support, and health behaviors. Furthermore, participants with lower levels of anger control exhibited higher cortisol reactivity during the blistering procedure. This enhanced cortisol secretion was in turn related to longer time to heal. These findings suggest that the ability to regulate the expression of one’s anger has a clinically relevant impact on wound healing.
1.1. Stress and wound healing Both brief naturalistic stressors and chronic stress are associated with delayed wound healing. For example, women who were caring for a spouse or parent diagnosed with dementia took on average 24% longer to heal a standardized wound compared to demographically indistinguishable control participants (Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 1995). Milder transitory stressors can also influence wound repair. Dental students took 40% longer to heal a wound placed on the hard palate before an examination compared to a wound placed at the end of their summer vacation (Marucha et al., 1998). Self-reported symptoms of psychological distress appear to affect speed of healing as well. Healthy young men who were classified as slow healers, i.e. who were in the half of the sample that took longer to heal, reported significantly more perceived stress than fast healers (Ebrecht et al., 2004). Similarly, patients with leg ulcers who exhibited higher levels of anxiety and depression were more likely to be categorized as slow healers, compared to patients reporting lower psychological distress (Cole-King and Harding, 2001). Even a very commonplace stressor, a discussion of marital problems, can delay wound healing. Couples took one day longer to heal blister wounds placed following discussion of a marital disagreement compared to wounds placed before a supportive interaction. Importantly, the couples who exhibited high levels of hostile behaviors across both visits took two more days to heal on average compared to less hostile couples. Following the marital interaction, hostile couples also reported higher levels of negative mood for the remainder of the day compared to couples displaying fewer negative behaviors; this increased negative mood occurred despite an absence of affective group difference at baseline, suggesting a lingering negative impact of the marital disagreement (Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 2005). 1.2. Anger and wound healing Anger is among the emotions elicited by conflicted interaction that might contribute to slower wound repair. This affective state includes feelings that range in intensity from irritation or annoyance to intense fury and rage (Spielberger et al., 1983). Trait anger represents the propensity to frequently experience feelings of anger (Spielberger et al., 1983), while hostility refers to a negative attitude toward others, consisting of enmity, denigration, and ill will (Smith, 1994). A hostile attitude appears to lead to more frequent episodes of anger (Eckhardt et al., 2004). The manner in which the anger feelings are expressed appears to influence the physiological and psychological consequences of this negative emotion (Deffenbacher et al., 1996). The tendency to express one’s anger outwardly toward individuals or objects through physically or verbally aggressive behaviors has been termed “anger out”, while “anger control” refers to the extent that an individual attempts to control the outward expression of anger. In contrast, “anger in” is defined as the tendency to suppress angry feelings (Spielberger, 1988). Anger expression styles have been conceptualized as stable traits (Eckhardt et al., 2004). In naturalistic studies, higher self-reported anger and anger suppression have been associated with a longer post-operative recovery and more post-surgical complications (Sharma et al., in press and Stengrevics et al., 1996). Those data suggest that anger might contribute to delayed wound healing. In addition, the expression of anger has been related to immune dysregulation. For example, family dementia caregivers who display high levels of anger out and low levels of anger control had a lower proliferative response to two mitogens than caregivers with low anger out and high anger control (Scanlan et al., 2001). Conversely, cardiac patients who had better control over the expression of their anger had higher natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxicity than patients who had poorer anger control (Ishihara et al., 2003). Furthermore, among men with prostate carcinoma, anger suppression has been associated with decreased NK cell cytotoxicity (Penedo et al., 2006). Differences in pattern of anger expression have also been associated with cortisol secretion, an important endocrine modulator of wound healing. Momentary assessment studies revealed that feelings of anger and their expression are associated with cortisol elevations 20 min later (Adam, 2006 and Adam et al., 2006). In a similar vein, hostile men who directed their anger toward their spouse during a marital interaction task exhibited higher glucocorticoid secretion than men who did not express angry feelings (Miller et al., 1999). Teachers experiencing high levels of job strain who tend to express their anger outwardly displayed higher early morning cortisol elevations compared to teachers who reported low levels of anger out (Steptoe et al., 2000). In addition, healthy volunteers frequently reporting suppression of their anger secreted more cortisol following acute laboratory psychological stressors (Larson et al., 2001). Data from both human and animal models have linked enhanced glucocorticoid secretion with slower wound healing. Higher elevations in morning cortisol were observed in healthy men who were categorized as slow healers compared to those who were considered fast healers (Ebrecht et al., 2004). Similarly, higher levels of salivary cortisol were associated with lower production at the wound site of two cytokines essential for the integrity of the repair process (Glaser et al., 1999). In animal models, a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist attenuated stress-related decrements in wound repair, confirming the role of this stress hormone in delayed wound healing (Padgett et al., 1998 and Detillion et al., 2004). Several studies suggest that the health consequences associated with different patterns of anger expression differ by gender. For example, outward expression of anger has been associated with altered glucose metabolism among women, but not men (Suarez, 2006). Similarly, a curvilinear relationship between anger in and systolic blood pressure has been described among women, while anger suppression had no impact on blood pressure among men (Hogan and Liden, 2005). In addition, sex differences in cortisol responses to stress have been reported. Some studies suggest that after puberty, but before menopause, women tend to exhibit less cortisol reactivity to laboratory psychological stressors than men (Kajantie and Phillips, 2006 and Kudielka and Kirschbaum, 2005). Therefore, gender might moderate the impact of anger expression on wound healing. 1.3. Relaxation and wound healing This study was part of a project examining the effects of relaxation on wound repair. Psychological preparation before surgery appears to promote better adjustment and recovery in clinical settings (Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 1998). Moreover, relaxation interventions seem to facilitate recovery following surgery (Montgomery et al., 2002). However, the physiological mechanisms underlying the effect of relaxation are largely unknown. Experimental studies suggest that psychological stress is associated with dysregulation of cytokines production at the wound site (Glaser et al., 1999 and Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 2005). Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether a relaxation intervention promotes faster healing by influencing inflammatory mediators of the wound repair process. 1.4. The present study Certain patterns of anger expression have been associated with maladaptive alterations in cortisol, immune functioning, and surgical recovery. Accordingly, we hypothesized that the style of anger expression could distinguish between fast and slow healers. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that individuals who tend to frequently express their anger outwardly or inwardly and those who have difficulty controlling the expression of their anger would be more likely to be categorized as slow healers, compared to participants with low anger out, low anger in, and high anger control. Given the known sex differences in the impact of anger expression on health outcomes, we also tested whether the impact of anger expression on wound healing was moderated by gender. We also hypothesized that higher levels of outward and inward anger expression and lack of control over the expression of anger would be associated with increased cortisol secretion and, in turn, more time to heal. Since production of proinflammatory cytokines appears to be modulated by cortisol (Glaser et al., 1999), we also examined the relation of IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α at the wound site to the mode of anger expression. This study was part of a research project examining the physiological mechanism by which relaxation can facilitate wound healing. It was hypothesized that individuals randomized to the relaxation intervention would heal faster compared to the control condition. In addition, we also hypothesized that the relaxation intervention would exert its action by influencing early inflammatory events at the wound site.