ابراز خشم، پشتیبانی شریک زندگی و کیفیت زندگی در بیماران مبتلا به سرطان
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|33387||2009||10 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||6393 کلمه|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Volume 66, Issue 3, March 2009, Pages 235–244
Objective Family members are the most important source of social support for cancer patients. The determinants of family support, however, are not well understood. In this study, the associations of anger-expression styles of both patients and their partners with patient-perceived partner support and the impact of these variables on long-term health-related quality of life (HRQL) of the patient were examined. Method The baseline data were collected at the time of diagnosis; a follow-up survey was conducted at 8 months. Questionnaires included the Spielberger AX scale, the Family Support scale, and the RAND-36 Health Survey. The sample comprised 153 patients and their partners. The theoretical model was tested with a path analysis using structural equation modeling, and gender differences were tested using multivariate analysis of covariance. Results Path analyses indicated that partner support was an important mediator, partly explaining the associations between anger-expression styles and HRQL. As hypothesized, anger control had a positive relationship with perceived partner support, while habitual inhibition of anger (anger-in) showed a negative correlation with partner support. Analyses by gender revealed some clear differences: for the male patients, the wife's high level of anger expression (anger-out) was significantly positively related to patient mental HRQL, whereas for the female patients, their husband's anger-out was negatively correlated with the patient's mental HRQL. In addition, patient's own anger-out had a more pronounced negative effect on HRQL for women as compared to men. Conclusion The anger-expression styles of both patients and their partners seem to modify the family atmosphere, and together, they are important determinants of the long-term quality of life of the cancer patients. Interventions for couples facing cancer should include a focus on ways of dealing with anger and thereby support dyadic coping with cancer.
Patients with cancer who perceive high levels of social support have been reported to better cope with their illness ,  and . Family members and especially partners are known to be the most important source of social support for patients facing a serious illness ,  and . Coping with cancer involves many emotions affecting the perceived outcomes of the patients as well as those close to them. Along with feelings of depression and anxiety, anger is a well-recognized emotion in the adjustment to the cancer diagnosis. Losses and other negative consequences of illness may lead to greater anger both in patients and in family members. From this perspective, it seems plausible that different ways of handling anger might be important factors modifying the atmosphere in a given family setting and affecting how a family member copes with illness. However, the impact of cancer patients' and their spouses' anger-expression styles on the patient perception of partner support and the later quality of life has not been previously studied. Support given by the family or partner is known to predict better quality of life  and adjustment to the disease in cancer patients  and . Nevertheless, relatively little is known about the relationship of the patient and partner's personal characteristics on patient-perceived partner support. Some specific psychosocial aspects of partner support, such as high empathy and low withdrawal, have been shown to be associated with good adjustment ,  and . There are, however, also controversial results on how close relationships are involved in the adjustment to major life crises, such as cancer. If patients exhibit high levels of distress, they may risk alienating significant others. Vice versa, partners having difficulties with the demands of role and lifestyle changes may add to the patient's distress instead of buffering against it ,  and . Previous research on social support has been based on the assumption that social support, as an independent causal factor, has a positive impact on physical and mental health. Recently, this narrow view of social support has been seriously questioned  and . It seems reasonable to assume that there is an ongoing, dynamic interplay between the personality characteristics and the level of perceived support of the partners. Therefore, it seems that the shift towards the concept of social support as a dependent variable opens important avenues in investigating the dyadic coping with cancer. Relatively little research has been reported on possible gender differences according to patient–partner status in psychological reactions to cancer. In an early study by Baider et al. , it was found that in 39 colon cancer couples, the adjustment of male patients was better than that of female patients, while in the group of partners, the opposite was true. While there are some contradictory results , in general, the literature suggests that partners report more distress than patients do  and , and female partners usually experience more distress than male partners . In addition, our previous results have indicated substantial gender differences regarding partner support and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Social support seems to be more important for women . Women have also been reported to possess more accurate understanding of their partner's experience with cancer and perceptions regarding social support in the relationship than men . Moreover, significant gender differences in anger expression have been found in previous studies  and . Earlier research has also suggested that habitual inhibition of anger (anger-in) has negative effects on available social support, whereas controlling one's anger (anger control) is more adaptive and is known to be positively related to social support ,  and . Furthermore, high levels of anger expression (anger-out) among patients with a pulmonary illness have been associated with decreased social engagement among support providers . On the other hand, greater anger-out has recently been associated with a higher quality of life and lower depression in patients with breast cancer  and . Thus, given the previous results that social support has a positive impact on quality of life and anger expression seems to relate with social support, it seems reasonable to assume that social support serves as an important mediating factor between anger expression and HRQL. Although high levels of anger have been associated with other psychological problems, research on anger and anger reduction in cancer patients has lagged behind research on other emotional problems  and . In recent years, anger expression in psycho-oncological research has been, to a large extent, overlooked.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
In this study, we found that patient-perceived partner support partly mediated the impact of patient and partner anger-expression styles on patient HRQL. The variance of partner support was mainly explained by within-patient variables with one important exception. Partner high anger-in had a clear negative effect on perceived partner support. In addition, patients' 8-month MCS was predicted by their own high level of anger control together with the perception of high partner support. For the female patients, the husband's high anger-out had a negative impact on MCS, whereas in men, their wives' high anger-out seemed to predict high MCS. Our results confirmed the importance of improving emotional support provision from members of naturally occurring networks, such as family members. The interactive process and intimacy in a dyadic relationship, however, is a very complex issue, and simple correlations between expression of an emotion and outcome variables do not reveal—and may even mask—the complexity of the support process. However, our results suggest that therapeutic interventions should identify the needs of each couple, thereby reducing the risk of angry interactions. Interventions for couples facing cancer should include a focus on the process of dealing with anger.