مولفه های مدت اثر استرس در لکنت زبان
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|33471||2002||14 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||محاسبه نشده|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Journal of Fluency Disorders, Volume 27, Issue 4, December 2002, Pages 305–318
The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether there is a relationship between stuttering on stressed syllables and the duration of these syllables. Sixteen adults who stutter read a text consisting of 226 syllables. The relative stress of each syllable was rated, and syllables were categorized into long- and short-stressed syllables, unstressed syllables and intermediate syllables lying in-between. In order to isolate effects caused by within-word position from those caused by linguistic stress, syllables in initial and in subsequent positions were analyzed separately. In both word position categories stressed syllables were stuttered more often than unstressed syllables. Stuttering frequency of intermediate syllables seems to be in-between stressed and unstressed syllables, just as their stress level is rated in-between. Results regarding the duration of stressed syllables do not allow final conclusions.
The syllable is the unit which contains linguistic stress or accent. Syllabic stress seems to be characterized by an overall increase of articulatory effort (Fowler, 1995). In detail, stress is realized by increasing duration, loudness, fundamental frequency, and accuracy of articulation of syllables (Lehiste, 1970). Already in 1938, Brown reported a stress effect in stuttering. Stuttering events occurred more often on stressed than on unstressed syllables in poly-syllabic words. In Brown’s study, more than 90% of stuttering events occurred on initial sounds of words. This well-known feature of stuttering is called the word-initial effect. In English, as well as in German, the majority of syllables containing stress is in the first position of words. Therefore, word-initial position and stress are confounded, requiring the isolation of their effects. This can be done, for example, by analyzing stuttering frequency of first and subsequent syllables of words separately. Indeed, Brown found the stress effect in other than the first syllables of words as well. Since Brown’s early work, several studies have dealt with stuttering and linguistic stress. Although different paradigms (e.g., the reading of word lists or connected speech) and definitions of stressed syllables (e.g., primary stress in poly-syllabic words or peaks in a stress rating along a continuum) were used, it was consistently found that stuttering occurred more often on stressed than on unstressed syllables (Bergmann, 1986 and Hahn, 1942; Klouda & Cooper, 1988; MacKay, 1970; Prins, Hubbard, & Krause, 1991; Wingate, 1984). In two studies using two-syllable words, it was found that stuttering events are more strongly associated with word-initial position than with stress (Hubbard, 1998 and Weiner, 1984). This means that the first unstressed syllable of a poly-syllabic word is more likely to be stuttered than a stressed syllable in later positions of the same word. The authors cited above, proposed several explanations of the stress effect, covering pure psychological, motor control, and linguistic factors. However, there is a lack of detailed descriptions of processes that might lead to the occurrence of individual stuttering events during the production of stressed syllables. A concrete conception is necessary and may result from a more detailed investigation of the stress effect. Such an investigation was the goal of this study and began with the definition of stress. As was noted above, stress is realized by variations in several parameters of speech production. On average, stressed syllables have longer duration than unstressed syllables, but this is not true in every case. For instance, the italicized syllables in “pitfall” and “peatbog” are both stressed, but the stressed syllable in the first word is spoken with a shorter duration than in the second word. The same vowel is used, so the example does not show an intrinsic duration effect. Stress can, therefore, be associated with a long or short duration of a syllable, and short-stressed syllables may have duration comparable to those of unstressed syllables. Consequently, it is clear that the concept “stress,” as used in the literature on stuttering, incompletely describes the physical parameters characterizing an individual stressed syllable. The duration component of stress could be important for the occurrence of stuttering, because long and short syllables seem to differ with respect to auditory control. Manipulation of auditory feedback, namely delayed or frequency-shifted auditory feedback, alters the production of long-stressed syllables. Delayed auditory feedback prolongs vowel duration and frequency-shifted auditory feedback leads to compensatory responses in fundamental frequency (Donath, Natke, & Kalveram, 2002; Kalveram & Jäncke, 1989; Natke & Kalveram, 2001a). However, in short syllables, the prolongation due to delayed auditory feedback is clearly shorter than in long-stressed syllables. Responses to frequency-shifted auditory feedback have a latency of about 150 ms, which is longer than many short syllables. It is concluded that peripheral feedback plays a greater role in the production of long-stressed syllables than in the production of short syllables (Natke & Kalveram, 2001a). Several authors have suggested that persons who stutter rely on auditory feedback in an abnormal way (e.g., Lane & Tranel, 1971; Neilson & Neilson, 1987; Yates, 1963), which raises the question of whether there is a relationship between the prominence of stuttering on stressed syllables and auditory control. Theories that view stuttering from a motoric point argue that instability of motor production contributes to stuttering (e.g., Van Lieshout, 1995). One can conclude that stuttering events should occur more often during articulatory movements that require greater motoric demands. In line with Stevens’ quantal theory (Stevens, 1998), it can be argued that the production of short vowels requires greater precision in articulation, because long vowels are at the extremes of the vowel space and vocal tract area functions sufficient for their production are larger than for most short vowels. In addition, short-stressed syllables are produced with higher movement velocities of articulatory gestures than long-stressed syllables. Therefore, short-stressed syllables may have higher requirements regarding precision and velocity than long-stressed syllables. As stated above, an important factor related with stuttering events is word-initial position. Other language factors related to stuttering events include grammatical class (function-content distinction), sentence position, word length, and phonetic type (initial phoneme) (Brown, 1945), as well as word frequency (Hejna, 1963). In a detailed review of the language factors, Wingate (1988) described the numerous inter-relationships among these factors as well as to stuttering, and provided evidence that the relationships between syllable-initial position, linguistic stress, and stuttering events are stronger than any of the other factors, or all of them combined. The present study was designed to provide a more detailed investigation of the stress effect in stuttering. It is investigated whether there is a relationship between stuttering on stressed syllables and the duration of these syllables. Connected speech is investigated and the stress level of each syllable is rated as done before by Prins et al. (1991). However, in the study of Prins and colleagues the word initial effect was not considered. This is problematic, because within-word position and stress are confounded, as noted earlier. In the present study, we addressed these two factors, which Wingate (1988) identified as crucial dimensions in describing the locus of stuttering events.