ساخت یک سیستم تجارت الکترونیک عامل واسطه با ویژگی های تجزیه و تحلیل تصمیم گیری
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|3379||2001||17 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||محاسبه نشده|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Decision Support Systems, Volume 32, Issue 1, November 2001, Pages 53–69
This paper describes a web-based electronic commerce system in which customers and merchants delegate the related tasks to their personal software agents. Messages passed between these agents can fully encapsulate the associated parties' points of view towards a market transaction. More specifically, an offer request consists of a list of the product attributes the customer wants to know about, a partial order of their importance, and the constraints imposed. On the other side, an offer proposal can be tailored according to the information conveyed in the corresponding offer request. Advanced features of the system include the permanent existence of our agents in the market, thus being able to learn from it, their ability to act proactively in order to initiate a transaction, and the integration of an interactive multiple criteria decision-making tool, with which a buying agent performs a comparative evaluation of the proposals in a semi-autonomous way.
Research work done during the last few years has dealt with a diversity of tasks involved in buying and selling goods and services in an electronic market (e-market)  and , and resulted to the implementation of a plethora of systems automating tasks such as product brokering, merchant brokering, and negotiation  and . Moreover, as many analysts predict, agent-mediated electronic commerce would further revolutionize Internet Commerce (see, for instance, Ref. ). This is mainly due to the fact that most basic characteristics of software agents, such as autonomy, proactiveness and “intelligence”, together with their ability to cooperate, make them suitable for the delegation of traditional commercial transactions. This paper describes a new agent-mediated electronic commerce system for the contemporary e-market. Its overall framework is not based on pre-classified ads; instead, the system's agents cooperate and get the related information in a real-time mode. Contrary to the majority of the already implemented systems, the one presented here addresses efficiently all of the following important issues. (i) The permanent existence of agents in the e-market; that is, agents that do not “live” only during a specific transaction but much longer, upon the subscription paid by their owners at the time they were launched (an actor may “hire” an agent for a month, a year, etc.). (ii) The proactiveness and semi-autonomy of agents; that is, agents that take the initiative to contact their actors in order to start a transaction that seems “interesting” to them (e.g., when a new product, which matches one's profile, appears in the market). Semi-autonomy of agents assures the right level of control for the actions they could take (a fully autonomous agent could cause problems). (iii) The maintenance of each actor's profile through the personalization of the agents involved; for instance, a customer's agent is supplied with a number of general interests (e.g., classical music, cruises) and preferences (e.g., one may dislike the black color on any product) of its actor, which can be enriched with more detailed ones each time the customer initiates a transaction. This gets extra value when agents “live” permanently in the e-market (see first issue above). (iv) The ability of a seller agent to refine some of the customer's purchase criteria, argue in favor or against them, or even bring up new information to persuade him/her to accept its offer. (v) The ability to handle incomplete, inconsistent and conflicting information during a purchase transaction, and perform a progressive synthesis and comparative evaluation (across a set of attributes) of the existing proposals. This requires a highly interactive tool, based on multiple criteria decision theory, that enables customers easily examine alternative scenarios (by selecting which of the proposals' attributes to be taken into account) and recommends the best solution according to the information at hand. Table 1 provides a comparative insight of our approach against four representative e-commerce systems, regarding the abovementioned features (the checkmark symbol denotes the existence of the related feature, “×” declares its absence, while the asterisk stands for a partial or alternative implementation of it). More specifically, Excite's Jango (http://www.jango.com) provides a comparison shopping Internet site, just allowing users to specify the name and category of an item before searching on-line stores for the lowest prices available. It is based on a rather low-level approach, which does not address any of the above issues. Being more sophisticated, PersonaLogic (http://www.personalogic.com) provides a set of predefined, category-based “guides”, and allows customers impose constraints, to be then exploited by a constraint satisfaction engine in order to prune alternatives that do not satisfy them. Regarding the issues above, only a comparative evaluation of the matched offers is supported; however, the constraints imposed are predetermined, upon the “guide”, and cannot refined or amended.Kasbah helps users creating agents to negotiate the buying and selling of goods on their behalf, also allowing the specification of parameters to guide and constrain an agent's overall behavior. However, these agents do not live permanently but only during the completion of a certain transaction, thus not fully exploiting each actor's profile, as well as the proactiveness and semi-autonomy of their agents (e.g., towards upcoming offers or requests). Negotiation in Kasbah is straightforward and based on some simple heuristics; this makes it intuitive for users to understand what their agents are doing in the marketplace, but does not allow for: (i) “open” argumentation and criteria refinement, (ii) handling of incomplete, inconsistent and conflicting data, and (iii) progressive synthesis and comparative evaluation of the entries matched. Finally, Tête-à-Tête, unlike most other online negotiation systems that competitively negotiate over price, equally considers product and merchant features to help the shopper simultaneously determine what to buy and whom to buy from. It also provides a set of pre-determined, user-profile-based specifications for the requirements of each product category, and multi-attribute utility theory to rank merchant offerings. Tête-à-Tête is certainly close to our approach in that it allows consumer-owned shopping agents and merchant-owned sales agents cooperate across multiple terms. However, the issue of the permanent existence of a consumer's agent is not fully exploited (see comments above); in addition, proactiveness and semi-autonomy of both shopping and sales agents is limited compared to our approach (see 2 and 3). Furthermore, argumentation in our system is more flexible, in that it does not have to be based on pre-determined specifications. The mechanisms deployed can efficiently handle any kind of incomplete, inconsistent and conflicting data. In conclusion, we argue that our interface for the progressive synthesis and comparative evaluation of multiple offers is more intuitive and closer to the real way of thinking of a purchaser (see Section 4). The remainder of the paper is structured as follows. The proposed e-market framework is analyzed in Section 2. The architecture of the software agents involved is illustrated in Section 3. The multiple criteria decision-making process is presented in Section 4. Finally, a real application of the system is discussed in Section 5, while concluding remarks and future work directions are outlined in Section 6. It should be made clear here that issues such as ordering, security, payment and delivery, while equally important in commercial transactions, do not fall in the primary scope of this paper.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
This paper has presented a web-based system for agent-mediated cooperation in an electronic market. The main contribution concerns the personalization of the agents involved, the progressive synthesis and multiple criteria comparative evaluation of the alternative proposals, and the specification of (communication and cooperation) protocols attempting to bring real and artificial markets closer. Future work directions concern the integration of a more elaborated negotiation stage (for an overview, see Ref. ), by exploiting a multicriteria-based negotiation model that has first been presented in Ref. . Negotiation of a set of product features, for instance, between a purchaser and a seller agent will enable the latter better tailoring its offer proposal and, eventually, work more efficiently for its merchant.