دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 34192
عنوان فارسی مقاله

نشانگرهای پنج عامل بزرگ 'IPIP' گلدبرگ: همسانی درونی و اعتبار همزمان در اسکاتلند

کد مقاله سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی ترجمه فارسی تعداد کلمات
34192 2005 13 صفحه PDF سفارش دهید محاسبه نشده
خرید مقاله
پس از پرداخت، فوراً می توانید مقاله را دانلود فرمایید.
عنوان انگلیسی
Goldberg’s ‘IPIP’ Big-Five factor markers: Internal consistency and concurrent validation in Scotland
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Personality and Individual Differences, Volume 39, Issue 2, July 2005, Pages 317–329

کلمات کلیدی
- شخصیت - نشانگرهای پنج عامل بزرگ '' گلدبرگ اعتبار سنجی -
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله نشانگرهای پنج عامل بزرگ 'IPIP' گلدبرگ: همسانی درونی و اعتبار همزمان در اسکاتلند

چکیده انگلیسی

Goldberg’s (2001) IPIP Big-Five personality factor markers currently lack validating evidence. The structure of the 50-item IPIP was examined in three different adult samples (total N = 906), in each case justifying a 5-factor solution, with only minor discrepancies. Age differences were comparable to previous findings using other inventories. One sample (N = 207) also completed two further personality measures (the NEO-FFI and the EPQ-R Short Form). Conscientiousness, Extraversion and Emotional Stability/Neuroticism scales of the IPIP were highly correlated with those of the NEO-FFI (r = 0.69 to −0.83, p < 0.01). Agreeableness and Intellect/Openness scales correlated less strongly (r = 0.49 and 0.59 respectively, p < 0.01). Correlations between IPIP and EPQ-R Extraversion and Emotional Stability/Neuroticism were high, at 0.85 and −0.84 respectively. The IPIP scales have good internal consistency and relate strongly to major dimensions of personality assessed by two leading questionnaires.

مقدمه انگلیسی

Personality assessment is important in a variety of situations, from academic research to clinical settings. Individual differences in human personality are often described as being quite comprehensively described by 5 higher-order factors (Matthews, Deary, & Whiteman, 2003), although an increasing body of evidence suggests that additional factors are required to account for important individual variation beyond that assessed within more traditional 5-factor frameworks (Paunonen & Jackson, 2000); a recent review of 8 psycholexical studies found support for a 6-factor model across seven languages (Ashton et al., 2004). For the purposes of the current study, however, a 5-factor model is employed due to the general consensus that exists about what those factors are; models with a higher number of factors are not entirely in agreement about what a 6th, 7th or nth factor would be.

خرید مقاله
پس از پرداخت، فوراً می توانید مقاله را دانلود فرمایید.