صفات پنج عامل بزرگ واسطه ارتباط بین ارزش ها و بهزیستی ذهنی
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|34221||2009||3 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||محاسبه نشده|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Personality and Individual Differences, Volume 46, Issue 1, January 2009, Pages 40–42
Traits and values have both been shown to predict subjective well-being (SWB), but the two sets of predictors have rarely been investigated together. A study of 180 undergraduates compared their predictive contribution and examined whether associations between values and SWB are mediated by traits. Several values from Schwartz’s model were associated with SWB, but these associations were weaker than those between Big Five traits and SWB. These traits mediated all associations between values and SWB. By implication, associations between values and SWB are largely indirect effects of stronger and more basic associations between traits and SWB.
Personality traits have long been recognized as strong predictors of subjective well-being (SWB) (DeNeve & Cooper, 1998) conceptualised as people’s levels of positive versus negative emotion and their satisfaction with life. SWB is consistently associated with all Big Five factors, notably low Neuroticism and high Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness and Openness. Relatively little research has examined whether SWB is also associated with values. Values are importantly different from traits, reflecting what people believe to be personally important rather than how they tend to think, feel and behave (Schwartz, 1992). Several theorists have argued that particular values are associated with SWB. Self-determination theorists (Deci & Ryan, 1991) propose that pursuing intrinsic goals such as autonomy and relatedness leads to SWB more reliably than pursuing extrinsic goals such as money and fame. Similarly, Bilsky and Schwartz (1994) argued that SWB is more strongly associated with realizing values related to growth needs than those related to deficiency needs. Framed within Schwartz’s (1992) value model, these theorists imply that values of Self-direction, Universalism, Benevolence, Achievement and Stimulation should be positively associated with SWB, and more extrinsic or deficiency-related values (e.g., Power, Tradition, Conformity, and Security) may be negatively associated. Some studies have supported these predictions. Sagiv and Schwartz (2000) found that Self-direction, Achievement and Stimulation were positively associated with positive affect, whereas Security, Conformity and Tradition values were negatively associated. Similarly, Roccas, Sagiv, Schwartz, and Knafo (2002) found positive affect to be associated with Self-direction, Stimulation and Universalism values and negatively associated with Power and Conformity values. Oishi, Diener, Suh, and Lucas (1999) demonstrated positive implications of Achievement values for SWB, and Sheldon (2005) found intrinsic values to be associated with high SWB. Finally, Kasser and Ryan (1993) showed that Benevolence values were associated with high SWB and extrinsic values with low SWB. Although traits and values are conceptually distinct, they are empirically related. Roccas et al. (2002), for example, found that Extraversion was associated with Achievement, Stimulation and Hedonism values; Openness with Self-direction, Universalism and Stimulation values; Agreeableness with Benevolence, Tradition and Conformity values; and Conscientiousness with Achievement and Conformity values. Although small to moderate in size, these associations imply that the trait and value domains have significant common variance. If traits and values are empirically related, associations between values and SWB may be mediated by traits. This possibility is consistent with the findings of Roccas et al. (2002), who showed that values accounted for 5% of the variance in positive affect but added only 2% to the variance explained by Big Five traits. However, Roccas et al. did not test for mediation and assessed only one component of SWB (positive affect). We therefore tested for mediation in a study of Big Five traits and Schwartzian values that included a more comprehensive SWB assessment. We hypothesized that any observed associations between values and SWB would be indirect (i.e., mediated by traits), given previous work indicating that traits are more powerfully linked to indices of SWB than values, and account for some of the predictive variance ascribed to values (Roccas et al., 2002).