کنترل شیوه تغذیه و آسیب شناسی روانی در نمونه غیر بالینی مادران و پدران
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|35366||2008||9 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||محاسبه نشده|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Eating Behaviors, Volume 9, Issue 4, December 2008, Pages 484–492
Objective To explore the relationships between controlling feeding practices and a range of mental health symptoms while considering both parent and child gender. Method Mothers and fathers (N = 214) of children aged 18–59 months completed self-report measures of their child feeding practices, eating psychopathology and general mental health symptomology. Results Feeding practices did not differ across any of the four parent–child gender dyads. Mothers’ eating psychopathology scores were significantly higher than fathers’ but parents did not significantly differ in the severity of their other mental health symptoms. Associations between disordered eating symptoms and controlling feeding practices were only seen in mothers of daughters and fathers of sons. In general, a range of mental health symptomologies in this non-clinical sample were related to more controlling feeding practices across all four dyads. Psychopathology was most strongly related to controlling feeding practices in parents of girls. Conclusion Symptoms of psychopathology may be more likely to associate with controlling feeding practices in parents of daughters due to societal values for slimness in females.
Psychopathology has been consistently associated with difficulties in parenting (Cummings & Davies, 1994) and, of particular interest, with problems within the domain of child feeding. Research in this domain has tended to focus on a limited selection of mental health problems, namely: symptoms of eating disorders; depression; anxiety; and, recently, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) (Blissett et al., 2007, Coulthard et al., 2004, Francis et al., 2001, Office For National Statistics, 2005 and Stein et al., 1999). Previous studies have focused primarily on mothers, investigating the relationships between maternal psychopathology and children’s feeding problems (e.g. Blissett et al., 2007 and Leinonen et al., 2003) and maternal psychopathology and controlling feeding practices with 1-year-old infants (e.g. Farrow and Blissett, 2005 and Stein et al., 1999). With the exception of a study by Blissett, Meyer, and Haycraft (2006), which examined eating psychopathology and child feeding practices in both mothers and fathers of young children, the relationships between mental health symptomology and child feeding practices in fathers have been scarcely researched. To date, no work has looked at associations between a broader range of psychopathologies and child feeding practices in both mothers and fathers, with their daughters and sons. Mental health problems can impair parents’ responsiveness to, and interactions with, their child, which may manifest in the implementation of more controlling, less sensitive child feeding practices. Controlling child feeding practices (for example, coaxing children to eat certain foods, pressurising them to finish a meal, or withholding food to use as a reward) can be unintentionally detrimental. They have been found to interfere with the child’s autonomy regarding feeding and eating (Fisher and Birch, 1999 and Johannsen et al., 2006), and have also been associated with children demonstrating less ability to self-regulate energy intake (Johnson & Birch, 1994) and with greater likelihood of children eating in the absence of hunger (Birch et al., 2003 and Fisher and Birch, 1999). Two types of controlling feeding practices which have been widely studied in the literature (e.g. Carper et al., 2000, Fisher and Birch, 1999, Francis et al., 2001, Haycraft and Blissett, 2008 and Johannsen et al., 2006), and will be the focus of this paper, are pressure to eat and restriction. These practices have been found to commonly co-occur, with parents often reporting the use of both pressuring and restrictive feeding practices (e.g. Carper et al., 2000). Restriction of children’s food consumption and the application of pressure for children to eat are feeding practices which have both been associated with the development of children’s later restrained eating and disinhibition (Carper et al., 2000 and Edmunds and Hill, 1999). While greater mental health symptomology has been associated with parents exhibiting both pressuring and restrictive controlling feeding practices (Francis et al., 2001), parents with mental health problems may alternatively exhibit less control over their children’s eating by withdrawing from the feeding situation; a behaviour evidenced by mothers with eating psychopathology (Waugh & Bulik, 1999). Previous studies of mothers with bulimia nervosa have noted that mealtimes with a young child can be particularly stressful (St John Alderson and Ogden, 1999, Stein et al., 1994 and Tiggemann and Lowes, 2002) and there may be a tendency for these mothers to distance themselves from the feeding situation for fear that the presence of food will trigger a loss of control, resulting in them bingeing (Patel et al., 2002). Given that the optimum feeding style appears to be characterised by authoritative practices, such as guidance, moderate control over foods that are provided to the child, and modelling of positive and healthy eating behaviours (Hudson et al., 2007 and Patel et al., 2002), mental health symptomology has the potential to promote non-optimal feeding interactions between parent and child via the development of either over or under control of feeding. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that the presence of psychopathology in parents can be related to greater overweight in their children and to parents’ perceptions of family mealtimes as less positive and more conflictual (Zeller et al., 2007). Costanzo and Woody (1985) suggested a theory of domain specificity with regard to parenting behaviours in the context of children’s obesity proneness. This theory purports that parents may be more likely to be controlling in areas in which they have concerns or high levels of investment. Thus, a parent with their own eating and weight concerns may be generally more invested in, and controlling with, their children’s feeding and eating and may be more concerned about their children’s potential for overweight. Costanzo and Woody found mothers with their own issues to perceive their daughters to be at greater risk than their sons in the domain of their own concern and, in turn, to be more likely to implement greater control. Numerous studies have since been conducted which support the theory that greater investment or concern might be related to controlling parenting behaviours and those which focus on the relationships between parents’ disordered eating attitudes and behaviours, as well as symptoms of other psychopathologies (specifically depression, anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder), with the controlling feeding practices of pressure to eat and restriction, will be outlined below. Eating psychopathology has been consistently associated with difficult feeding interactions between mothers and children. Parents for whom eating is an issue are more likely to exert control over their children’s eating (Tiggemann & Lowes, 2002) and eating psychopathology has been found to interfere with a mother’s ability to respond in a child-sensitive manner regarding food and mealtimes, suggesting that inappropriate parental feeding practices may result from a parent’s need to maintain control over their children’s feeding and eating (e.g. Stein et al., 1999). Indeed, a mother’s own investment in weight and eating issues and high levels of cognitive dietary restraint with her own eating have been related to the use of more controlling child feeding practices (Francis et al., 2001 and Johannsen et al., 2006). Yet eating psychopathology, or excessive dieting, is not always associated with parents reducing their children’s intake of foods. Dieting mothers who reported thinking about their own weight status when deciding which foods to eat were found to eat more healthy foods themselves, but fed their children more unhealthy foods, suggesting that dieting women who are limiting their own food consumption may find a release from their desires to eat unhealthy foods by instead feeding them to their children (St John Alderson & Ogden, 1999). Research into fathers’ eating psychopathology is sparse, potentially due to its historically low prevalence in men (1:10, males:females in the UK; Eating Disorder Association, 2000). However, a more recent national survey in the US indicated a difference between eating psychopathology prevalence in males and females of 1:3 for anorexia and bulimia nervosa (Hudson, Hiripi, Pope, & Kessler, 2007). Furthermore, this study suggested that sub-threshold binge eating disorder was three times more prevalent in men than women in the US. That eating psychopathology prevalence appears to be increasing in men highlights the potential value of including fathers in this study. In addition, a recent study found fathers who reported greater dissatisfaction with their own bodies reported increased monitoring of their sons’ but not daughters’ food intake (Blissett et al., 2006). Furthermore, research has suggested that extrapolation of eating psychopathology may be particularly prevalent within same gender parent–child relationships (Blissett et al., 2006 and Fisher and Birch, 1999), although other studies have suggested that there are also important relationships between fathers and daughters’ eating psychopathology (Thelen & Cormier, 1995). The implementation of insensitive, controlling feeding practices has also been associated with the presence of other psychopathologies. For instance, maternal depression has been found to relate to greater application of pressure for 5-year-old daughters to eat (Francis et al., 2001). Depression is neither stable nor uniform, and has been associated with hostility, coercion, withdrawal, and lower parental self-efficacy (Cox et al., 1987, Cummings and Davies, 1994 and Stein et al., 1999), all of which may influence feeding interactions. Hence, for some parents, depression may relate to hostility in responding to children’s signals and interference, such as overt pressure to eat, while for others it may be characterised by a withdrawal from interactions, characterised by parents’ reduced involvement in feeding situations. Although limited, research evidence has found fathers’ depressive symptoms, such as irritability and pessimism, to associate with less nurturing and more punitive parenting (Leinonen, Solantaus, & Punamäki, 2003) and it is suggested that these practices may extend into the feeding domain, with depressed fathers displaying less nurtured, more disciplined feeding practices, exemplified by greater feeding control. Anxiety has also been related to controlling feeding practices. Anxious parents may be overly concerned with how much, how little or what type of food their child is eating which may result in pressurising or restrictive feeding practices or intrusive monitoring (Farrow and Blissett, 2005 and Francis et al., 2001). Anxiety has also been associated with negative mealtime interactions, particularly for mothers of boys (Blissett et al., 2007). If parents are anxious about feeding their child, mealtimes may become stressful or aversive and parental anxiety surrounding food and mealtimes may make parents less sensitive and/or responsive. This may, in turn, promote the child to exhibit challenging eating behaviours (such as food refusal or fussiness) which elicit parents’ controlling feeding practices or the restriction of certain foods (Farrow & Blissett, 2005). Similarly, greater reported obsessive-compulsive symptomology has also been linked to greater maternal use of restriction of their children’s food intake 1 year postpartum (Farrow & Blissett, 2005). Children’s developing autonomy regarding self-feeding can be difficult and messy. For parents who report anxiety or obsessive-compulsiveness this may be a stressful time, which culminates with them needing to re-take control over the feeding situation by implementing controlling feeding practices. Although much of the research to date has focused on a few specific aspects of mental health it is likely that other elements of psychological distress may associate with more difficult feeding interactions, resulting in more problematic mealtimes and more maladaptive feeding practices. Based on the findings of studies looking at eating psychopathology, depression, anxiety and OCD it is likely that the presence of other types of psychopathological symptoms will relate to the use of more controlling feeding practices. Farrow and Blissett (2005) examined a broader range of psychopathologies using a non-clinical sample of mothers with 1-year-old infants and found the presence of various mental health symptoms to relate to greater restriction of their children’s food intake. Specifically, they found that somatization, paranoid ideation and overall levels of psychological distress, in addition to anxiety and OCD symptoms, were associated with restrictive feeding practices in mothers of these infants. The current study expanded on this by considering a sample of mothers and fathers with young children over the age of 18 months. Children over 18-months-old are weaned, and parents’ use of feeding strategies with these young children, who are more autonomous feeders, may differ from those implemented with infants. The present study sought to recruit a sample of mother–father pairs of young children in order to build on previous works by including fathers in addition to mothers. Despite the fact that mothers have been established to spend more time than fathers in direct interactions with their children, including mealtimes (McHale, Crouter, McGuire, & Updegraff, 1995), and that mothers tend to report more responsibility for feeding their child, and more monitoring of their child’s food consumption than fathers do (Blissett et al., 2006 and Francis et al., 2001), fathers have been found to play an important role in child feeding (Johannsen, Johannsen, & Specker, 2006) and research has called for the inclusion of fathers in studies within the child feeding domain (Blissett et al., 2006, Hughes et al., 2005 and Office For National Statistics, 2005). Moreover, numerous works have identified different patterns of relationships within the child feeding domain for parents of daughters and parents of sons (Blissett et al., 2006, Carper et al., 2000, Costanzo and Woody, 1985, Fisher and Birch, 1999, Johannsen et al., 2006 and Thelen and Cormier, 1995). Societal pressures, such as the high value placed on thinness, especially for women, may play a role in encouraging greater restriction of food intake for daughters than sons, and may instil more concern in parents about their daughters’ food consumption and weight than their sons’ (Johannsen et al., 2006 and Thelen and Cormier, 1995). In contrast, societal pressures for boys to be “big and strong” may encourage greater application of pressure for sons to eat more, and less restriction of foods consumed by parents of sons. Indeed, Klesges and colleagues found that boys aged 1–3 were presented with food more often than girls (Klesges et al., 1983). Because these findings suggest that there may be different patterns of relationships between feeding practices and predictive variables dependent on the child’s gender, this study considered the relationships separately for girls and boys. Based on the associations between restriction and pressure to eat with the development of children’s later restrained eating and disinhibition (Carper et al., 2000 and Edmunds and Hill, 1999), the current study focused on these two controlling feeding practices. It aimed to discover whether a broad range of psychopathological symptoms in parents were related to the use of these feeding practices in mothers of daughters, mothers of sons, fathers of daughters and fathers of sons. This study was exploratory but based on previous studies of mothers using a more limited range of psychopathologies a series of a priori hypotheses were made. It was hypothesised that eating psychopathology would relate to the use of more controlling feeding practices in mothers of daughters and fathers of sons and, specifically, that the presence of bulimia symptoms would be associated with restriction in mothers of daughters. It was also predicted that greater reported mental health symptomology would relate to the use of more controlling feeding practices. In particular, it was expected, based on findings from previous studies, that higher levels of depression would relate to greater application of pressure to eat (Francis et al., 2001), that higher levels of OCD would be associated with more restrictive feeding practices (Farrow & Blissett, 2005), and that higher levels of anxiety would associate with greater pressure and restriction, especially in mother of boys (Blissett et al., 2007). Moreover, an examination of the relationships between parents’ feeding practices and psychopathology was required for each of the four parent–child gender dyads (mother–daughter, mother–son, father–daughter, father–son) and differences between parents’ reports of controlling feeding practices were considered across the four groups. While it was expected that the pattern of relationships would vary between the four groups, with the strongest relationships between psychopathology and control being evident in same gender dyads, it was not expected that mothers’ and fathers’ controlling feeding practices with daughters and sons would differ significantly. Furthermore, because of the increased prevalence of eating psychopathology in women, differences between mothers’ and fathers’ psychopathology scores were also examined, with mothers expected to score more highly than fathers in their reported eating disorder symptoms.