تاخیر در تنزیل، اما نه عدم بازداری یا عدم توجه، واسطه بخشی از اثرات روان رنجوری بر روی اختلال تغذیه ای در نوجوانان
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|35433||2015||6 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||5525 کلمه|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Eating Behaviors, Volume 18, August 2015, Pages 91–96
Adolescence represents an integral developmental period for the prevention and intervention of disordered eating. Individuals with high levels of neuroticism have been shown to respond with greater impulsivity and use of disordered eating as a coping mechanism. However, the exact mechanism through which neuroticism and impulsivity affect disordered eating remains unknown. To understand the effects of personality and impulsivity on disordered eating in adolescence, the present study aimed to investigate whether impulsivity mediated the relationship between neuroticism and disordered eating. Adolescents (N = 40) between the ages of 13 and 19 (Mage = 18.25 years; S.D. = 1.30) were queried on eating attitudes and personality, as well as completed behavioral tasks assessing impulsivity (delay discounting, disinhibition and inattention). Mediation analyses revealed that neuroticism was significantly associated with patterns of disordered eating, but delay discounting, and not disinhibition and inattention, appeared to mediate the relationship between neuroticism and disordered eating. These results should guide prospective research exploring the relations between neurotic and impulsive behavior, particularly delay discounting on disordered eating, which will assist in future treatment efforts targeting the development of maladaptive eating behaviors.
Adolescence represents a critical time in the manifestation and maintenance of disordered eating. Disordered eating during adolescence is high and those adolescents who engaged in disordered eating are at increased risk for these behaviors ten years later (Neumark-Sztainer, Wall, Larson, Eisenberg, & Loth, 2011). Disordered eating can be conceptualized as dieting, unhealthy weight control practices and binge eating (Neumark-Sztainer et al., 2011). This often includes the negative monitoring and maintenance of weight, shape, and eating. Unfortunately, disordered eating is associated with a number of problematic outcomes including obesity and eating disorders, especially in youth (Gearhardt et al., 2014, Neumark-Sztainer et al., 2006 and Peebles et al., 2012). This can lead to risk for health complications involving the cardiovascular, skeletal, endocrine, reproductive, and gastrointestinal systems (Torstveit & Sundgot-Borgen, 2014). In addition to being physically harmful, disordered eating can also have a detrimental psychological impact (Butcher, Mineka, & Hooley, 2013). Those engaging in disordered eating can experience elevated levels of suicidal ideation, depression, mood and anxiety disorders, substance abuse, and withdrawal from interpersonal relationships (National Institute of Mental Health, 2011 and Torstveit and Sundgot-Borgen, 2014). Thus, recent research efforts have focused on determining the risk factors associated with disordered eating broadly, to identify those at risk for eating disorders or obesity. Multiple etiologies focusing on biological, socio-cultural, and behavioral factors have been proposed with hopes of enhancing prevention, education, and treatment programs. As a result, it has been proposed that certain personality-behavioral traits play a significant role in the pathogenesis and development of disordered eating, which renders certain adolescents more vulnerable to disordered eating-conducive environments than others. A large majority of research has focused on personality characteristics. Specifically, neuroticism, which is marked by high levels of anxiety, moodiness, worry, and perfectionism, is one of the most consistent associated risk factors in research studying disordered eating (Butcher et al., 2013). Individuals with eating disorders (EDs) have been found to have higher levels of neuroticism than the general population, as well as those engaging in behaviors on the ED spectrum (Cassin and Von Ranson, 2005, Davis and Fischer, 2013, Izydorczyk, 2012 and Maclaren and Best, 2009). Interestingly, emotional eating, a facet of disordered eating, was also found to be related to neuroticism (Izydorczyk, 2012). Further, individuals who scored lower on the neuroticism scale were predicted to have less disordered eating behaviors and attitudes than those with higher levels of neuroticism (Ferguson, Muñoz, Winegard, & Winegard, 2012). Neuroticism has also been shown to increase the likelihood of developing disordered eating patterns (Juarascio, Perone, & Timko, 2011). Meaning that higher levels of neuroticism forecasted higher levels of disordered eating, at a proportional rate (Brannan & Petrie, 2008). However, previous results linking neuroticism to disordered eating are not consistent. Brown (2007) found that neuroticism did not appear to be significant personality characteristic in prediction of internalization of the thin-ideal or body dissatisfaction, and therefore eating disorder development. Further links between neuroticism and disordered eating are currently absent from the literature. Thus, understanding the underlying behavioral mechanisms influencing disordered eating choices have recently become of interest. At the forefront of this discussion has emerged the contribution of impulsivity to disordered eating. Impulsivity, behavior characterized by little forethought, unplanned reactions without considering future consequences, and disregard for choices in favor of long-term success (International Society for Research on Impulsivity, 2012), is considered a dimensional construct. These constructs are thought to include the following: failure to maintain attention for a period of time (inattention), disinhibition of responses, and inability to see the long-term consequences and failure to make decisions in favor of long-term goals (delay discounting or decision making; Reynolds, Penfold, & Patak, 2008). Within the spectrum of eating disorders, impulsivity has been extensively studied (Claes et al., 2006, Claes et al., 2005 and Fischer et al., 2008). Generally, those women with greater body dissatisfaction were found to be more impulsive, such as those that fall on either extreme of the eating disorder spectrum (Scherr, Ferraro, & Weatherly, 2010). Further, particular ED subtypes were determined by rates of impulsivity, with bingeing/vomiting types showing the highest correlations of urgency and sensation seeking behaviors (Claes et al., 2005). Moreover, Fields, Sabet, Peal, and Reynolds (2011) found that impulsivity contributes to onset and maintaining of behaviors leading to obesity as well as being more prevalent in obese adolescents when compared to healthy-weight counterparts. It has been suggested that disordered eating is used as a means to cope with neurotic and impulsive urges. Individuals with high levels of neuroticism, or negative affect state, were more likely to act irrationally, or make rash decisions, thereby making these individuals more vulnerable to disordered eating (Davis & Fischer, 2013). Bulimic women were found to have higher rates of distress as a result of their neurotic personality trait and in response, greater levels of impulsivity, than women who were not diagnosed with an eating disorder (Fischer, Smith, Annus, & Hendricks, 2007). It was also determined that binge eating, a common type of disordered eating, was found to help bulimic women cope with both their neurotic tendencies and impulsive urges, suggesting that disordered eating may serve as a coping mechanism and a result of both neurotic and impulsive tendencies (Fischer et al., 2007). Therefore, because individuals with high levels of neuroticism, or negative affective states, have been shown to act irrationally or make rash decision, recent research has begun to explore the interplay between neuroticism and impulsivity on disordered eating and development of EDs (Davis & Fischer, 2013). Previous research examining the association between neuroticism and disordered eating are mixed. Further research examining neuroticism, impulsivity and disordered eating is scarce and no study to date has examined impulsivity as a mediator between neuroticism and disordered eating. Moreover, previous research has almost exclusively focused on adult populations and not adolescents; even though this developmental period is most vulnerable to the onset of disordered eating. An examination of neuroticism and impulsivity in the manifestation and maintenance of disordered eating is needed. Neuroticism renders individuals susceptible to more stress, which may result in greater impulsivity and willingness to engage in unhealthy coping mechanisms, such as disordered eating. Understanding how impulsivity, as a behavioral construct, may mediate the relationship between neuroticism and disordered eating can provide a better understanding of the underlying mechanism through which these factors relate to one another. The objective for the present study is to determine if delay discounting, a dimension of impulsivity, mediates the relationship between neuroticism and engagement in disordered eating. Based on previous research, we hypothesize that impulsivity — delay discounting, disinhibition, and inattention — will mediate the relationship between neuroticism and all subscales of disordered eating, but only partially. This information may increase our knowledge of the underlying mechanisms contributing to the onset of disordered eating and therefore eating disorders, in adolescents and emerging adults in hopes to assist future education-, prevention-, and treatment efforts.