نسبت انگشت - طول 2D:4D در کودکان و بزرگسالان مبتلا به اختلال هویت جنسی
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|35973||2008||5 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||محاسبه نشده|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Hormones and Behavior, Volume 54, Issue 3, August 2008, Pages 450–454
Previous research suggests that prenatal testosterone affects the 2D:4D finger ratio in humans, and it has been speculated that prenatal testosterone also affects gender identity differentiation. If both things are true, then one would expect to find an association between the 2D:4D ratio and gender identity. We measured 2D:4D in two samples of patients with gender identity disorder (GID). In Study 1, we compared the 2D:4D ratios of 96 adult male and 51 female patients with GID to that of 90 heterosexual male and 112 heterosexual female controls. In Study 2, we compared the 2D:4D ratios of 67 boys and 34 girls with GID to that of 74 control boys and 72 control girls. In the sample of adults with GID, we classified their sexual orientation as either homosexual or non-homosexual (in relation to their birth sex) to examine whether or not there were any within-group differences as a function of sexual orientation. In the sample of adult men with GID (both homosexual and non-homosexual) and children with GID, we found no evidence of an altered 2D:4D ratio relative to same-sex controls. However, women with GID had a significantly more masculinized ratio compared to the control women. This last finding was consistent with the prediction that a variance in prenatal hormone exposure contributes to a departure from a sex-typical gender identity in women.
Biological influences on the development of gender identity disorder (GID) have long been the subject of intense theoretical conjecture (Baum, 2006, Gooren, 2006 and Meyer-Bahlburg, 1984). Genetic factors may play a role (see, e.g., Coolidge et al., 2002); however, because there are well-documented cases of identical twins discordant for GID (e.g., Segal, 2006), it is clear that other factors are also involved. In this regard, the most prominent biological model about GID development concerns the role of prenatal sex hormones (Meyer-Bahlburg, 1984): as a direct main effect (Reiner and Gearhart, 2004), in relation to the genes involved in the sexual differentiation of the gonads and, possibly, of the brain (Arnold, 2004 and Fleming and Vilain, 2005), or, perhaps, in interaction with postnatal psychosocial factors. The empirical evaluation of prenatal hormone theory, as applied to sex-dimorphic behavioral differentiation in humans, has often focused on within-sex variations in sex steroid exposure. Numerous studies of children born with disorders of sex development (physical intersex conditions) have shown sex-dimorphic behavioral effects; for example, research on genetic females with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), a condition characterized by high prenatal androgen levels, has consistently identified evidence for postnatal behavioral masculinization, particularly with regard to gender role behavior and sexual orientation (for review, see Cohen-Bendahan et al., 2005). Children and adults with GID have strong cross-gender identification, display an array of cross-gender behaviors, and express the desire to become a member of the opposite sex. Many children with GID, but not all, differentiate a homoerotic sexual orientation in adolescence (Drummond et al., 2008, Green, 1987 and Zucker and Bradley, 1995). Adults with GID who have a childhood history of pervasive cross-gender behavior (“early-onset” cases) also have a homoerotic sexual orientation. In contrast, “late-onset” adults with GID, i.e., those without a childhood history of pervasive cross-gender behavior, are much more likely to have a non-homosexual sexual orientation (see, e.g., Blanchard, 1989). For children and adults (particularly the “early-onset” cases) with GID, it has long been speculated that a variance in prenatal testosterone exposure contributes to their departure from a sex-typical gender identity, gender role, and sexual orientation. However, at present, there is no clear clinical evidence of atypical prenatal sex steroid levels in children or adults with GID (even at levels that might allow the configuration of the external genitalia to remain intact, which is almost always the case) or variation in androgen metabolism (Bentz et al., 2007). In the present study, we used an indirect method for investigating the putative effects of prenatal exposure to testosterone on gender identity differentiation by assessment of the 2D:4D finger ratio — the relative lengths of the 2nd (“index”) finger and the 4th (“ring”) finger. Use of 2D:4D measurement as a “window” (Manning, 2002) into prenatal development has become extremely popular over the past 10 years and several lines of evidence have accumulated suggesting that 2D:4D variation might be related to variation in prenatal exposure to testosterone and to variation in postnatal sex-dimorphic behavior. The formation of both digits and genitals are controlled by the same genes: Homeobox or Hox genes (Kondo et al., 1997). In humans (see Manning et al., 1998) and in mice (Kondo et al., 1997), a mutation of a single Hox gene leads to deregulation of both digits and genitalia. Since sex steroids influence the development of the genitalia, it has been surmised that this might also hold true for the fingers. Indeed, in humans, the 2D:4D ratio has been shown, on average, to differ between males and females. In females, the two fingers are approximately equally long, but in males the fourth digit is usually longer than the second (Manning et al., 1998 and McFadden and Shubel, 2002). This sex-dimorphism in 2D:4D has been documented in aborted fetuses at weeks 9–40 of gestation (Malas et al., 2006) and deceased fetuses at a mean gestation of 28 weeks (range, 14–42) (Galis et al., submitted for publication), in children as young as 2 years of age (Manning et al., 1998), and appears to remain relatively stable throughout the life course (e.g., Trivers et al., 2006). Manning (2002) advanced the hypothesis that variation in prenatal androgen exposure was at least partially responsible for the sex-dimorphism in 2D:4D. Evidence in support of this hypothesis comes from experimental manipulation of prenatal androgen exposure in pheasants (Romano et al., 2005) and from two studies of women with CAH, who had more masculinized finger ratios than unaffected female controls (Brown et al., 2002b and Ökten et al., 2002; for a null finding, see Buck et al., 2003). van Anders et al. (2006) also found that females with a male co-twin had a more masculinized 2D:4D than females with a same-sex twin, which was inferred to be the result of a prenatal androgen transfer effect. To date, only two studies have examined 2D:4D in adult patients with GID. Schneider et al. (2006) compared the finger ratios of 43 female-to-male transsexuals to a control group of 65 (presumably heterosexual) women and Kraemer et al. (2007) conducted a similar study of 17 female-to-male transsexuals with a control group of 190 women (188 were classified as heterosexual). In both studies, there was no evidence for an altered 2D:4D ratio in the female patients with GID. Thus, these two studies provided no support for the hypothesis of a masculinized prenatal hormonal milieu. Schneider et al. (2006) also compared the finger ratios of 63 male-to-female transsexuals to a control group of 58 (presumably heterosexual) men. They found some evidence for a feminized 2D:4D ratio in their male-to-female transsexuals, an effect that was even stronger when restricted to right-handed participants, but this was limited only to the right hand. Because Schneider et al. did not have information on the sexual orientation of their patients, it was not possible to determine if the feminized 2D:4D pattern was specific to male-to-female patients with a homosexual sexual orientation or was characteristic of both homosexual and non-homosexual patients (H. J. Schneider, personal communication, November 13, 2007). In the other study, Kraemer et al. (2007) compared the finger ratios of 39 male-to-female transsexuals with a control group of 176 men (163 were classified as heterosexual). Kraemer et al. found a more feminized 2D:4D ratio on the right hand, but not the left hand, in their male patients with GID. The same pattern was reported in an analysis restricted to right-handed participants. Kraemer et al. also compared their homosexual and non-homosexual male patients with GID and found no significant difference in 2D:4D. Thus, for men with GID, these two studies appeared to provide support for the hypothesis of a feminized 2D:4D pattern, which would be consistent with prediction derived from prenatal sex hormone theory. The purpose of the present study was to compare 2D:4D in two new samples of patients with GID. In Study 1, we compared the 2D:4D ratios of adult male and female patients with GID to that of heterosexual male and female controls. In Study 2, we compared the 2D:4D ratios of boys and girls with GID to that of control boys and girls. In the sample of adults with GID, we classified their sexual orientation as either homosexual or non-homosexual (in relation to their birth sex) in order to examine whether or not there were any within-group differences as a function of sexual orientation.