اقتصاد دیجیتالی و معضل کسب و کار الکترونیکی
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|3700||2004||10 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید|
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله تقریباً شامل 7090 کلمه می باشد.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Business Horizons, Volume 47, Issue 4, July–August 2004, Pages 71–80
The e-business environment is placing growing emphasis on the digitalization of product and service offerings, creating a set of economic conditions that differ from those characterized by physical products. Suppliers need to compete not only on overall quality but also on “information age strategies” that can prevent them from falling into acompetitive trap where they cannot recover their costs. Versioning, confounding, networking, and pricing are needed to compete effectively, but these strategies often give rise to paradoxes from the buyer’s perspective. Thethinking manager can use the guidelines offered here to manage their e-business offerings more effectively.
the past few years have seen a number of debates over whether e-business requires new or different thinking about business and strategy. Regard-less of the various views, the reality is that contemporary information technologies (ITs) are facilitating rapid digi- talization, storage,and transfer of product and service experiences. This will not abate. So a productiveexercise is to examine business strategy by looking at the economic impacts of digitalization. Here we try to take a step back and reexamine the dynamics of e-business and its poten- tial impact on the economy from fundamental andenduring economic principles. Our aim is to provide managers of enterprises in this digi- tal age with guidance on key factors that will have a con- trolling effect on the likely evolutionary path of e-busi- ness. Moreover, these controlling factors will affect the balance of power between market participants, specifi- cally, suppliers and entrepreneurs on the one hand and consumers on the other. We conjecture that the evolution- ary path and the balance of power are intimately linked and will result in a precarious economic balancing act— precarious in the sense of generating huge benefits for the economy as a whole, but with the potential to initiate large swings in the division of those benefits between buyers and suppliers. As such, managers of companies that digitalize their offerings or use today’s Internet and other networks for business have a compelling interest to comprehend the new economic reality and leverage it to their respective advantage. The failure to do so can have dramatic negative consequences for the complacent party
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
the common theme in all these paradoxes is read- ily apparent as suppliers use IT in an informa- tion-intensive environment to generate premium prices unlinked from costs. Many of these strategies are not new and not even rare. However, they are becoming more and more feasible in an e-business environment. The thinking manager who appreciates the economics of digits can find the underlying rationale useful in viewing e-business and competition. By engaging in versioning, confounding, network effect leveraging, and predatory pricing strategies, suppliers are not necessarily doing any- thing illegal but are attempting to survive and thrive in an environment in which the conventional competitive equi- librium is unpalatable. Strategies to raise prices in the face of intensive competition and lower barriers to entry become the only viable options. It is important to note that these strategies are particularly useful in evaluating pure plays that have digital products (news), places (websites), and processes (buying). How- ever, we believe these arguments are useful for firms that provide any kind of digital experience to customers. While physical products themselves are not subject to digital economics, information about their characteristics, config- uration, operation, selling, support, and so on is, thereby allowing consideration of versioning, confounding, net- work effects, and pricing strategies. Intervention due to antitrust issues, consumerism, and market forces might inhibit the use of some of these strategies. Regulatory and antitrust issues might come into play when supplier actions (a) are predatory and involve proactive leveraging of market power in order to drive competitors out of business and (b) impinge on personal privacy as advocated by consumer groups. The infomedi- ary Google is currently under intense scrutiny by Google- Watch.org, a nonprofit group dedicated to informing the public about the search giant ’ s inner workings, particu- larly as it relates to bias in its indices and privacy. More- over, companies like Epinions focus on reducing con- founding information on products by providing unbiasedcomparison services. However, it is our contention that firms that are not vigilant in developing an infomediary, personalization, profiling, segmentation, pricing, and bundling approach to their digital offerings will not suc- ceed. In the milieu of the Web, the quality of a firm ’ s offering is paramount, but so are the information age strategies needed to prevent competitive demise. We are in the midst of an e-business battleground with three major sets of players: buyers, suppliers, and regula- tors. Suppliers typically have greater IT capitalization, but face new economics of digital costs. This makes it impos- sible for them to compete at marginal costs approaching zero in a highly competitive environment that demands a higher infusion of fixed costs. Therefore, they must engage in ways to reduce the competition despite a growing buyer ability to shop and compare products. Versioning, con- founding, leveraging network effects, and pricing strate- gies are four complementary ways to leverage their IT cap- italization to do this. It is good economic sense.