توقف در گفتمان بانک های مرکزی
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|41927||2015||10 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||محاسبه نشده|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Studies in Communication Sciences, Volume 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 83–92
This paper examines the role and place of hedging in central bank discourse in order to determine to what extent a focus on classical hedges can yield an adequate analysis of the phenomenon. The research hypothesis is that, given the multiple risks at stake, a broader, more inclusive approach to hedging is called for than that adopted by many scholars. The paper brings evidence that beyond the quantitative aspects—between 4.7% and 5.8% of the words in the corpus are classical hedging devices—it is important to consider the qualitative and discursive dimension of hedging.