دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 53683
عنوان فارسی مقاله

تفاوت ارزیابی زیبایی بین دو دانش مرتبط: بررسی تطبیقی معماری و دانشجویان مهندسی عمران

کد مقاله سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی ترجمه فارسی تعداد کلمات
53683 2012 8 صفحه PDF سفارش دهید محاسبه نشده
خرید مقاله
پس از پرداخت، فوراً می توانید مقاله را دانلود فرمایید.
عنوان انگلیسی
Aesthetic Evaluation Differences between two Interrelated Disciplines: A Comparative Study on Architecture and Civil Engineering Students
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 51, 2012, Pages 533–540

کلمات کلیدی
ارزیابی زیبایی؛ ترجیح بصری؛ آموزش معماری؛ آموزش مهندسی عمران؛ همکاری میان رشته ای
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله تفاوت ارزیابی زیبایی بین دو دانش مرتبط: بررسی تطبیقی معماری و دانشجویان مهندسی عمران

چکیده انگلیسی

The study presented in this paper aims to discuss the need and value of interdisciplinary collaboration between architecture and civil engineering students while executing the differences and similarities between their aesthetic evaluations and visual preferences. A research was conducted to evaluate and compare the aesthetic evaluations of architecture and civil engineering students through selected architectural buildings. It is hypothesised that there would be a difference between the two groups’ evaluations and descriptions of the visual attributes. Photographs of 6 different buildings were chosen which had different characteristics related with their structure, form and context; and a questionnaire was designed. 35 architecture and 30 civil engineering students were asked to describe the selected buildings. A “Visual Evaluation Test”, which included photographs of the selected buildings was used within the questionnaire. Additionally, the participants were asked to rank 6 buildings due to their aesthetic preferences. Data was statistically analysed through semantic differential scales, and “Mann Whitney U Test”. Results from the two groups of respondents had some similarities and differences. Despite the two different groups described the settings with similar adjectives, they gave different responses on choosing the buildings as “like” or “dislike”. Besides, the two groups’ responses to the questions which they ranked the buildings due to their aesthetic preferences differed substantially. In relation with the findings, the educational processes of two disciplines were discussed and some suggestions were given.

خرید مقاله
پس از پرداخت، فوراً می توانید مقاله را دانلود فرمایید.