تحولات اقتصاد کلان و مکانیسم انتقال : مدارک و شواهد از ترکیه
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|5923||2012||10 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||6760 کلمه|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Economic Modelling, Volume 29, Issue 4, July 2012, Pages 1440–1449
This paper investigates changes to the macroeconomic transmission mechanism in Turkey following a major reform of monetary policy in the early 2000s. We use a Threshold VAR (TVAR) framework to test for and then estimate a model with endogenous transitions between regimes. We detect two regimes, with a clear transition between them in 2003–4. The pre-reform regime is characterized by high inflation, passive monetary policy and persistent responses to shocks. The post-reform regime is characterized by low inflation, active and credible monetary policy and markedly less persistent responses to shocks. Using a model that contains sufficient variables to capture diverse transmission mechanisms, working through the real exchange rate, domestic credit and monetary policy, we find evidence of sharp changes in transmission mechanisms. Post-reform, the response of Turkey to macroeconomic shocks has changed to be similar to those in other modern, market-orientated economies.
This paper investigates changes to the macroeconomic transmission mechanism following a major change in monetary policy regime. We consider the case of Turkey. Following decades of inflation, volatile output growth and frequent large and destabilizing nominal exchange rate depreciations, Turkey enacted a package of reforms in the early 2000s aimed at promoting macroeconomic stability through the establishment of a credible monetary policy framework. These reforms appear to have been a success; inflation has fallen, exchange rate volatility has fallen and output growth has become more stable. Indeed, in sharp contrast to previous global crises, Turkey has weathered the financial crisis beginning in 2008 with less volatility in exchange rate and inflation rates than many other countries. This paper investigates the impact of these reforms on the macroeconomic transmission mechanism in Turkey. The transmission mechanism describes the response of macroeconomic variables such as output, the price level, interest rates and the exchange rate to a variety of shocks. There are suggestions in the literature that the transmission mechanism may have changed. Karasoy et al. (2005) find evidence of a changed monetary policy rule, Kara and Ogunc (2005) argue that the impact of the exchange rate on the domestic economy has changed, while Başçı et al. (2007) argue that the importance of interest rates and domestic credit has changed. This paper takes a wider perspective by examining changes in the transmission mechanism as a whole, rather than specific aspects of it. Much contemporary macroeconomic analysis focuses on the transmission mechanism (summarised in Christiano et al., 1999 and Boivin et al., 2010). This literature emphasises the complexity the transmission mechanism, which is seen as operating through many distinct channels. Mishkin (1996) distinguishes between interest rate, exchange rate, equity price, bank lending and separate corporate and household balance-sheet channels. Boivin et al. (2010) discuss interest rate, wealth, intertemporal substitution, exchange rate, bank-based and balance sheet channels. Other models highlight alternatives such as liquidity and risk-taking channels (Borio and Zhu, 2008 and Cooley and Quadrini, 2004). Central Banks also highlight the diverse ways in which policy rates affect the real economy. For example, the Bank of England's view of the transmission mechanism is that changes in policy rates affect money market interest rates, asset prices, the exchange rate and expectations (Bank of England, 1999) while the ECB (2010) places more emphasis on effects working through the labour market and the supply of credit. This is reflected in the variables included in our empirical model; we use output, prices, a short-term interest rate, the amount of credit in the economy and the real exchange rate. The span of these variables is wide enough to encompass the diverse transmission mechanisms considered in the literature while retaining parsimony. The literature also emphasises likely changes in the transmission mechanism over time. Transmission reflects structural macroeconomic relationships as well as the behaviour of policymakers. Changes in structural relationships or in the policymaking environment will therefore change the transmission mechanism. We model possible changes in the transmission mechanism using a Threshold VAR (TVAR) model (Tsay, 1998). This is a natural extension of the standard approach is modelling the transmission mechanism using a VAR (Christiano et al., 2010 and Peersman and Smets, 2003). Our use of a TVAR framework is motivated by a number of factors. The most obvious alternative approach is to assume a regime break on a particular date and estimate separate models using data from either side of that break. We prefer the TVAR approach since it allows us to test for the existence of multiple regimes and to date switches of the economy between these regimes, rather than simply assuming the existence of and dating of regime change a priori. Other possible alternatives include using a model in which the coefficients of a VAR evolve over time (Boivin et al., 2010) or a Markov-switching model in which transitions between regimes are random. Neither seems appropriate in this case; the clear change in the policy framework seems inconsistent with gradual evolution of parameters and random transitions. Our model develops previous work by Kara and Ogunc (2005), who estimate VAR models compromising the output gap, nominal exchange rate depreciation, the core inflation rate and the inflation rate for the pre- and post-2001 period. We focus on the transmission mechanism as a whole rather than just the exchange rate channel investigated by Kara and Ogunc (2005), and are able to use more data from the post-reform period. Our work also complements the analysis of Başçı et al. (2007) by providing econometric estimates to complement their more descriptive analysis. The paper is structured as follows. We introduce our TVAR model in the next section. Section 3 outlines the data used in the estimation. The empirical results on nonlinear impulse responses and forecast error decompositions are presented in Section 4. Finally, the paper ends with concluding remarks and policy suggestions.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
This paper has developed a simple empirical macroeconomic model of Turkey that focuses on changes in the transmission mechanism that generate changes in output, the price level and other key macroeconomic variables in response to a variety of shocks. Recognising the major reform of economic policy following the crisis of 2001, we have tested for the existence of multiple regimes. Having detected these, we estimated a TVAR model that allows the structure of the macroeconomic model to vary across distinct regimes and used these estimates to calculate impulse response functions that describe the response of endogenous variables to macroeconomic shocks and to decompose the variance of endogenous variables into components that reflect the effect of shocks. We have found clear evidence of a change in the transmission mechanism and dated this to 2003–4; the change in regime therefore reflects changes in the macroeconomic policy environment. The Turkish economy can be characterized as being in a high inflation regime from the start of our sample until the reforms took effect; since then it has been in a more stable low inflation regime. We found clear evidence of changes in the response of output and the price level to a variety of shocks, to the real exchange rate, the amount of credit in the economy and the policy interest rate; from this we conclude that the transmission mechanism did change. Our paper argues that there was a marked changed in all aspects of the transmission mechanisms in Turkey following the successful implementation of the reform program. A natural development of our work would be to consider individual transmission mechanisms in more detail to assess how it has changed. This would require a more detailed and structural model than that used in this paper. We hope to address this in a future work.