بررسی سود و زیان برای طرح صدور گواهینامه داوطلبانه ی کیفیت هوا در محیط داخلی در هنگ کنگ
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|6665||2004||19 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||9729 کلمه|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Science of The Total Environment, Volume 320, Issues 2–3, 29 March 2004, Pages 89–107
A voluntary indoor air quality certification scheme has been proposed in Hong Kong for assessing and evaluating the indoor air quality level in a variety of public places like offices, restaurants and pubs. The scheme intends to promote the public well being, however, its technical and financial practicality has led to serious discussions among the government officials, practitioners and premises owners. Accordingly, this study intends to develop a protocol for examining its financial viability by linking the appropriate dose-response and economic data with the results from indoor micro-environment models. The financial viability of the scheme is evaluated by examining the cost and benefit associated with compliance on the different prescribed indoor particulate (PM10) levels. According to our analysis, the indoor action level of 180 μg/m3 as 8-h mean (with the objective of protecting the health of general public) does not require office owners to improve beyond the base setting. Nevertheless, owners should consider altering the base settings in their air conditioning systems so as to secure more benefit on every dollar they spent. On the contrary, the 20 μg/m3 level as 8-h mean (with the objective of providing comfort) is not considered to be financially viable for office owners as they will incur financial loss on compliance. Subsequent sensitivity analysis indicates that the total net benefit derived have a great dependency on the value-of-life estimates used. If conservative health estimates are adopted, the optimum level determined to be beneficial to both owners and the society will be 55 μg/m3, which can be obtained by operating the air conditioning system with a ventilation rate of 10 l/s, primary filters of 80–85% efficiency and secondary filters efficiency of 60–65% arrestance. This information should be extremely valuable for government officials and policy makers in assessing the financial viability of the voluntary indoor assessment scheme.
Among these initiatives, the proposed adoption of GN has attracted the greatest concern within the public community. The GN intends to set up a voluntary indoor air quality certification for assessing the indoor air quality level in a variety of public places, like offices, restaurants and pubs, by creating a hierarchy structure of three-level air quality objectives as a common benchmark for public places to comply. The objectives prescribed by three different levels vary, with level 1 the most stringent and level 3 the least stringent. Specifically, level 1 represents very good indoor air quality that a high-class and comfortable building should have; level 2 represents indoor air quality that provides protection to the public at large, and level 3 represents indoor air quality that provides protection to workers and employees as enforced under the current occupational safety and health laws (IAQ Management Group, HKSAR, 1999). By complying with levels 1 and 2, the likelihood of indoor air pollution leading to health problems or discomfort in the building would become small. The ultimate objective of the GN is to promote the public well being, however, its technical and financial practicality has led to some serious discussions among government officials, practitioners, premises owners, and employers. Given that the GN is a voluntary scheme, the cost and benefit associated with its compliance will be expected to be one of the decisive factors for premises owners and employers to adopt the GN. In particular, it would be vital for owners of the premises and employers, especially during the economic downturn, to be fully aware of their financial commitment before complying with different levels defined in the GN. Even though there are increasing numbers of studies around the world focusing on the assessment of health benefit and cost effectiveness associated with ambient air command-and-control regulations (Ostro and Chestnut, 1998, Pearce and Crowards, 1996, El-Fadel and Massoud, 2000 and Quah and Boon, 2003), there is no literature reporting on the development of a systematic methodology for estimating the cost and benefit associated with a voluntary indoor air quality scheme. Accordingly, this paper attempts to address this gap by developing a protocol by linking the appropriate concentration–response and economic data with the results from mass balance micro-environmental models in evaluating the benefit and cost associated with compliance. Also, it is intended to identify the optimum pollutant levels that can provide the maximum amount of benefits and return on investment for premises owners, employers as well as the society.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
This work presents a pioneering approach in assessing the benefit and cost associated with compliance with the requirement of voluntary indoor scheme, i.e. Guidance Notes of Indoor Air Quality in Offices and Public Places in Hong Kong. The results of a synthesis of best available epidemiology and economics literature to assess the health benefits of the indoor PM10 level defined in the GN suggest that the long-term health benefits are likely to be substantial. As expected, the more stringent the standard level prescribed, the greater benefit will be conferred to both owners and society, despite additional costs will be needed to meet the more stringent level. However, this will arouse great concerns for both premise owners and policy-makers as the GN is mainly voluntary in nature. Our estimated results reveal that the 180 μg/m3 being laid down by the Level 2 with the objective for protecting the general public health in the current draft of the GN does not require premise owners to improve beyond the base setting, despite more benefit per dollar spent can be obtained by altering the base settings in the air conditioning systems. On the contrary, the more stringent level 1 for comfort will certainly require owners to invest additional resources for compliance. Upon our analysis, the 20 μg/m3 level being prescribed by the level 1 is not considered to be financially viable for owners as they will incur financial loss on compliance. Our subsequent sensitivity analysis indicates that the total net benefit derived will have a great dependence on the value-of-life estimates used. If conservative health estimates are adopted, the optimum level determined to be beneficial to both owners and the society would be 55 μg/m3, which would be obtained by operating the air conditioning system with a ventilation rate of 10 l/s, primary filters of 80–85% efficiency and secondary filters efficiency of 60–65% arrestance. This information should be extremely valuable for government officials and policy makers in assessing the financially viability of the voluntary indoor assessment scheme.