آسایش حرارتی خانه های دیوار چوبی در مناطق ساحلی و کوهستانی در مناطق گرم
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|66744||2015||7 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||محاسبه نشده|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Procedia Engineering, Volume 125, 2015, Pages 725–731
Thermal comfort theory of Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) is proven incompatible for tropical area. Actual Mean Vote (AMV) is a way to recognize the thermal comfort based on inhabitant's behaviour and psychology (adaptive thermal comfort). The purpose of this research is to analyse the difference between AMV and PMV in wooden walls traditional houses in coastal and mountainous region which will be used to establish the theory of adaptive thermal comfort. Method of this research is quantitative by measurement thermal variable (temperature, globe temperature, velocity, relative humidity) use thermal measurement tools. This measurement carried out in conjunction with filling out the thermal comfort questionnaire from ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refigeration, Air conditioning Engineering) standard. The number of sample taken is 25 houses in coastal region and 25 houses in mountainous region with criteria of more than one inhabitant in each house. Mountainous region chosen is Wonosobo Regency whereas coastal region selected is Demak Regency. The analysis is conducted by using PMV program from ASHRAE and statistic test undergone is to obtain the difference of PMV and AMV. The result obtained is the average difference between AMV and PMV in coastal region in the amount of +0.73, while the houses in mountainous region have the average difference of -0.81. It is concluded that bias in the wood-frame houses in mountainous region are bigger than those in coastal region. AMV Value for the houses in coastal is -0.28 and AMV value for the houses in mountainous is -1.12, it mean that occupants in the coastal houses are more comfortable than occupants in the mountainous houses.