گسترش کارکرد کیفیت QFD در ارزیابی فن آوری جدید تولید
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|7001||2000||12 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید|
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله تقریباً شامل 4120 کلمه می باشد.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : International Journal of Production Economics, Volume 67, Issue 2, 10 September 2000, Pages 103–112
The large number of new technologies being developed means it is vital for organisations to make appropriate selections that will translate limited capital resources into maximum competitive advantage. However, a thorough economic evaluation of a technology requires considerable time and effort. This paper presents a tool developed from the techniques of quality function deployment. This tool allows a rapid evaluation of the feasibility of using the thixoforming process to manufacture products. The paper describes the semi-solid metal processing technology of thixoforming, the relevant quality function deployment techniques and the approach used to develop the tool.
Computer Aided Design, Computer Aided Manufacture, Computer Integrated Manufacture, rapid prototyping, high-speed machining, hot isostatic pressing and thixoforming are just a small selection of the many innovative technologies being promoted around the world. All of these technologies have the potential to provide manufacturing organisations with a competitive advantage over their competitors. The major difficulty though is in selecting and investing in the most suitable technology. Not only does an organisation have to make this selection accurately but also rapidly if it is not to lose the opportunity to an ambitious competitor. Investment in many of these technologies involves a degree of risk, especially for those with few or no existing commercial applications. In these cases the lack of available process expertise means that investment in research and testing will be necessary to develop a stable and reliable process. For such a developed commercial application the benefits which have been attributed to the technology by its proponents may not appear as anticipated. There is therefore a need to ensure that this investment and development effort is not wasted on inappropriate technologies. Investment appraisal techniques have been refined over a number of decades to provide a reasonable financial measure of the value of making an investment in capital equipment. Techniques used include Payback Period, Net Present Value and Internal Rate of Return. The benefits offered by these new technologies are not always directly quantifiable (e.g. increased process flexibility) and cannot be included in conventional financial appraisal approaches. Primrose  has shown how such benefits can be accurately quantified, but the level of detail required in such an accurate economic viability analysis requires a significant time and allocation of resources. There is a need to subject these technologies to some kind of filter before an organisation commits itself to the requirements of an in-depth economic analysis. Researchers in the Department of Engineering Materials at the University of Sheffield have been involved in the development of one such innovative manufacturing technology. The technology for the semi-solid processing of metals, also called thixoforming, has been available for some years. Although commercialised in Japan, the US and Europe it has yet to be commercialised in the UK despite the many benefits promised. A three year study on the “Exploitation of Semi-Solid Processing” was embarked upon to provide stimulus for this adoption. One of the key components of this work was a software package for potential users of the technology. This software “ThixoCost” was to provide facilities for carrying out a “Cost–Benefit Analysis” of the technology using a business process perspective, for the application circumstances of any user company. During the development of this software it became obvious that before the managers of a company were able to commit the resources necessary for gathering the cost data for such an analysis, they wanted an “expert” opinion on whether their particular products were likely to be suitable. Part of the aim of the project became to analyse the experience held within the Thixoforming Research Group and incorporate it, in a structured way, into a decision making tool within the software, to offer users such an opinion. Initially, the application of a neural net was considered. This could accept as inputs, measures of relevant attributes that characterise a product. The net could be trained with the details of existing commercial thixoformed products and those of products currently recognised as unsuitable. The small number of existing commercial users of the technology meant that the availability of such training data was limited and difficult to obtain, effectively preventing the use of this approach. Quality function deployment (QFD) was therefore considered as an evaluation tool. This paper describes the process used to develop this tool and highlights its potential for application to technologies other than thixoforming.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
The multi-attribute matrix analysis tool has been developed from the techniques of QFD and applied to the evaluation of potential products for an innovative metal forming process. This technology evaluation tool does not substitute for a comprehensive economic analysis. The level of subjectivity necessary in allocating characteristic settings, importance weightings and interrelationship scores, if such a tool is to be applied generically, means specific accuracy cannot be achieved in each case. Instead the value of such a tool is in the focusing of a subsequent economic analysis or removing the need for it altogether. From this work, it would seem that a similar approach could be as effectively applied to the analysis of other new innovative technology applications. High-speed machining for example has both benefits (e.g. rapid production cycle, thinner webs, etc.) and drawbacks (e.g. high cost of machines, lubricants and tooling) which the tool could evaluate against relevant product characteristics (e.g. geometry, material, machinability, etc.).