طراحی سیستم تولید با استفاده از الگوریتم های ژنتیکی چند هدفه مقاوم، شبکه های پتری و عدم اطمینان نمایندگی های بیزی
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|8141||2013||10 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||8271 کلمه|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Volume 32, Issue 2, April 2013, Pages 315–324
Decisions involving robust manufacturing system configuration design are often costly and involve long term allocation of resources. These decisions typically remain fixed for future planning horizons and failure to design a robust manufacturing system configuration can lead to high production and inventory costs, and lost sales costs. The designers need to find optimal design configurations by evaluating multiple decision variables (such as makespan and WIP) and considering different forms of manufacturing uncertainties (such as uncertainties in processing times and product demand). This paper presents a novel approach using multi objective genetic algorithms (GA), Petri nets and Bayesian model averaging (BMA) for robust design of manufacturing systems. The proposed approach is demonstrated on a manufacturing system configuration design problem to find optimal number of machines in different manufacturing cells for a manufacturing system producing multiple products. The objective function aims at minimizing makespan, mean WIP and number of machines, while considering uncertainties in processing times, equipment failure and repairs, and product demand. The integrated multi objective GA and Petri net based modeling framework coupled with Bayesian methods of uncertainty representation provides a single tool to design, analyze and simulate candidate models while considering distribution model and parameter uncertainties.
Robust manufacturing system design involves finding a manufacturing system configuration that yields better performance measures such as throughput and WIP under different manufacturing system uncertainties (such as uncertainties in processing times, equipment failure and repairs and product demand). Typical examples of manufacturing system configuration design include finding optimal number of resources in different manufacturing cells in a plant, devising optimal production planning or inventory management strategies, designing layout plans for efficient product flow. In the context of this paper, manufacturing system configuration design is referred to as finding optimal number of resources in different manufacturing cells within the plant. Decisions involving robust manufacturing system configuration design are costly and involve long term resource allocation. These decisions typically remain fixed and failure to design a robust manufacturing system can lead to high production and inventory costs, and lost sales. The design decisions become more complex when new systems are being designed, or new products are being launched as sufficient information about underlying uncertainties is not accurately available. Two important aspects of robust manufacturing system design involve: problem space search and accurate uncertainty representation. The approach used for searching different design configurations should be able to explore broader set of design solutions and provide insights into relative advantages and disadvantages of each design configuration. In addition, it is also important to accurately account for different manufacturing system uncertainties. A common approach to model uncertainties involve fitting a distribution model to the available data and then randomly sampling points from the distribution model to account for variability. The correct selection of distribution model and its parameters is highly dependent on the data quality (number of data point available and variability in the dataset). The selection of correct distribution model and its parameters become more critical when new systems are being designed due to lack of information and uncertainties in process behavior. For such systems, it is important to account for model and parameter uncertainties. Model uncertainties are uncertainties involved in selecting a correct distribution model, and parameters uncertainties are uncertainties involved in selecting the correct distribution parameters for the selected distribution model (See Draper , Chick ,  and , Andradóttir and Bier , Zouaoui and Wilson ,  and  and Henderson  for more details). Current literature review shows use of sensitivity analysis or experimental design based approaches to account for parameter uncertainties. However, the methods used to select the sensitivity parameters or experimental design settings have not been well described in the literature. The literature review does not suggest any approach to account for model uncertainties in manufacturing system design. This paper presents a novel approach involving multi objective genetic algorithms, Petri nets and Bayesian model averaging for robust manufacturing system design. The proposed approach is demonstrated on a manufacturing system configuration design problem to find optimal number of machines in different manufacturing cells in a manufacturing system producing multiple products. The objective function aims at minimizing makespan, mean WIP and number of machines. Uncertainties in processing times, equipment failure and repairs, and product demand are considered. It is assumed that reconfiguration costs are high, so the design configuration obtained at the beginning of planning horizon will remain fixed for entire planning horizon. Multi objective GA is used to provide a Pareto front of design solutions against different decision metrics (i.e. makespan, mean WIP and number of resources). This allows the designers to weigh-in relative merits of each design configuration and evaluate the sensitivity of design solutions against variability in the cost functions associated with each decision metrics. In addition, this approach eliminates the need to re-explore different design configurations if the cost functions changes. A Bayesian model averaging (BMA) based approach has been considered to represent different uncertainties. It provides a unified framework to incorporate model, parameter and stochastic uncertainties. Recent work of Chick ,  and , Zouaoui and Wilson ,  and  and Henderson  clearly show the advantages of using BMA. We show the effects of ignoring model and parameter uncertainties for a robust manufacturing system design and show that ignoring these uncertainties underestimate the decision metrics that can lead to improper design decisions. Our results reveal that Bayesian framework provides better uncertainty representation as compared to classical methods using sensitivity analysis and ignoring demand variations. The Bayesian framework has been integrated with Petri nets for modeling and performance analysis of manufacturing systems. Petri nets based formalism not only incorporate properties of discrete event simulation but their formalism can be translated for manufacturing system monitoring and control in future. The following approach is used for finding a robust manufacturing system configuration design. A multi objective GA coupled with Petri net is first used to find candidate configurations against makespan and WIP under processing and arrival rate uncertainties, which are represented in a Bayesian framework. The candidate configurations are then evaluated against demand variations that can arise in future planning periods. The design configuration which results in lowest overall cost at the end of all the planning periods is selected as a robust configuration. The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 provides literature review of work done in robust manufacturing system design, Section 3 provides the problem formulation, Section 4 describes the proposed approach, and Section 5 describes the results obtained for robust design problem. Finally, Section 6 provides the summary and future work for the paper. 2. Relevant work One of the most widely used approaches for robust design is Taguchi's signal to noise ratio based experimental design. The approach finds design solutions such that they are more robust against uncontrollable variations. The approach usually involves using orthogonal arrays and signal to noise ratios for finding a robust configuration. The signal to noise ratio takes into account both variability in response data and the closeness of average response to target value (Mezgar et al. ). Current literature also shows use of other design of experiments based approaches such as fractional factorial design and response surface methodologies integrated with Taguchi's methods for robust design. Madu and Madu  demonstrated an application of Taguchi based approach using orthogonal arrays and signal noise ratio to maximize equipment utilization for a maintenance cell. The approach provided best design point from a limited number of design points and with minimal experimentation time. Lim et al.  used Taguchi's methods for finding optimal configuration of operating policies for a manufacturing system to maximize throughput and minimize flow time. Bulgak et al.  used orthogonal arrays and normal probability plots for finding robust design with considerations of variation in uncontrollable factors such as jam rates and jam clear times in a assembly line. Mezgar et al.  used design of experiments and artificial neural network based technique for design and real time reconfiguration of manufacturing systems. Sanchez et al.  provided a framework for designing, analyzing and improving systems by combining discrete event simulation and response surface meta modeling. Chen and Chen  presented a Taguchi concept and response surface based methodology for designing a robust manufacturing system configuration. The authors presented a nine step procedure which uses weighted design measure as performance evaluation criteria. Shang  used a Taguchi and response surface methodology (RSM) for finding a robust design of a material handling system. When number of controllable and uncontrollable factors is large, finding a robust design solution becomes more complex and time consuming. For such cases, heuristic methods such as genetic algorithms (GA) or simulated annealing (SA) can be used. Saitou et al.  used a GA and Petri net based approach for finding robust manufacturing system configuration that underwent forecasted production plan variations. Their approach however, does not consider uncertainty in operating times of different resources and uses a single objective function. Kazancioglu and Saitou  presented a methodology for allocating production capacity among flexible and dedicated machines under uncertain demand forecasts by quantifying the expected values of product quality and cost. Hamza et al.  used a NSGA-II based multi objective GA approach to optimize assembly sequence plan, and to find type and size of assembly stations for a production shop that produced wind propelled ventilators. In other related work, Gaury and Kleijnen  presented a risk analysis based approach for robust system design, in which risk is evaluated by simulating the system over a sample of environmental scenarios. Kleijnan and Gaury  presented a methodology which includes simulation, optimization, uncertainty analysis and bootstrapping for robustness modeling. Pierreval and Durieux  presented a two stage optimization technique in which heuristic search methods are first used to determine near best solutions and their performance. In the second stage, several possible environmental scenarios are considered and evaluated according to their performance using reference curves. Pierreval and Durieux-Paris  suggested a heuristic method to measure and compare the robustness of solutions using simulation against a base environment. The proposed approach uses decision theoretic methods and involves decision maker's knowledge in decision making process. Different types of evolutionary algorithms have been applied to solve different aspects of manufacturing system design. Wang and Koren  employed a genetic algorithm based optimization methodology to identify the most economical way to reconfigure a manufacturing system to meet new demand. Paydar et al.  presented a simulated annealing based approach to design cellular manufacturing systems. They used the approach to solve the problem of formation of part families and machine cells while considering the operational sequence within each cell layout. Neto and Filho  presented a multi-objective optimization and simulation based approach for generating a set of alternative manufacturing cell configurations while considering level of work in progress, inter cell moves and total machinery investment. Um et al.  developed a multi objective non-linear programming (MONLP) and evolutionary strategy (ES) to analyze the influence of design parameters on various critical factors (minimizing congestion, minimizing vehicle utilization and maximizing throughput) for design and analysis of flexible manufacturing systems with automated guided vehicles. In other related work, Satoglu and Suresh  presented a goal programming based approach for design of hybrid cellular manufacturing systems consisting of both functional and cellular layouts. The authors used a three step approach involving: Pareto analysis of product demand and volatility, machine grouping and labor allocation. Mahdavi et al.  developed a mathematical model for manufacturing cell formation problem involving assignment of machine and parts to different manufacturing cells while considering assignment of workers to the cells. Current literature shows a void in using formal methods for uncertainty representation. Existing literature shows that authors either use constant times for different uncertainties or certain distributions with fixed parameters. In design of experiments approaches, parameter uncertainty (for example, uncertainty in mean) is considered at discrete points (usually 2–3). Processing, set up and failure time related uncertainties are usually in continuous space and considering these uncertainties at (extreme) points can overestimate/underestimate their effects. In addition, the methods used to select these discrete points are not well described in the literature. We could not find any literature where designers considered effect of model uncertainty while designing robust manufacturing design. Such uncertainties can have a large impact when simulation decisions are costly and less information about underlying processes is known (Andradóttir and Bier ). The proposed approach overcomes these limitations and provides a more insightful and straightforward approach which involves Genetic algorithms for searching candidate solutions, Bayesian methods for uncertainty representation and Petri nets for manufacturing system modeling. The use of these three tools allows designer to eliminate conflicting solutions and accurately predict the performance of candidate configurations. In addition, the designers are actively involved in the decision process as these tools just provide a means to evaluate candidate configurations, but it is the designer who will make the final decision by looking at possible scenarios and associated weight of each objective function
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
The paper presented a multi objective GA and Petri net based methodology using Bayesian methods of uncertainty representation for robust design of manufacturing systems. The proposed approach provides a systematic method to consider candidate configurations, which are obtained using formal approaches of uncertainty representation (Bayesian methods) and model evaluation (Petri nets). In addition, instead of giving a single point assessment of objective function, the approach generates a set of candidate solutions which can be evaluated against their relative merits and demerits. We considered a manufacturing system example which produced multiple types of parts that undergo different processing sequences. The uncertainties related to processing times, part arrivals, machine failures and repairs, and product demands were considered. Fully Bayes’ BMA with conjugate priors was used to represent such uncertainties. The objective function for the problem was defined as a cost minimization of makespan, mean WIP, stock out costs and number of resources. The NSGA-II algorithm coupled with Petri net model provided a Pareto front of candidate configurations. The objective functions were obtained using Bayesian methods which provided better assessment of underlying processes. The proposed approach uses stochastic Petri net models for analysis of different configurations. These Petri nets often encounter state space explosion for large sized problems. The work can be extended to colored Petri nets which enable higher level representation. Colored Petri nets have been shown to alleviate the state space explosion problem considerably. Since the focus of this paper was to demonstrate an approach for uncertainty representation, a future extension would include use of colored Petri nets for modeling different configurations. The problem considered here assumed that the cost of system reconfigurations were significantly higher, so reconfigurations were not allowed from one time period to another. An example of such system would be wafer manufacturing units in semiconductor industry where equipment and their installation are significantly expensive. However, the proposed approach can be extended to manufacturing systems which allow reconfigurations from one planning period to another by modifying the objective function to include reconfiguration cost. The reconfiguration cost can be a function of total set up cost (associated with addition or removal of equipment from one period to another), and production time lost due to the changeover. As compared to the existing approach, the modified algorithm would require identification of optimal design configurations during each planning period that result in minimum overall costs. Despite these limitations, the proposed approach provides a better way for robust manufacturing system design. Given the fact that design decisions are costly and long term, it becomes imperative to have higher degree of accuracy about underlying system and consider impacts of process and product mix uncertainties while making such design decisions.