تولید برنامه بازنشستگی با کمک های تعریف شده موثر با استفاده از روش بهینه سازی شبیه سازی
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی||تعداد کلمات|
|9798||2012||6 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید||محاسبه نشده|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Expert Systems with Applications, , Volume 39, Issue 3, 15 February 2012, Pages 2684-2689
This paper presents an optimization approach to analyze the problems of portfolio selection for long-term investments, taking into consideration the specific target replacement ratio for defined-contribution (DC) pension scheme; the purpose is to generate an effective multi-period asset allocation that reaches an amount matching the target liability at retirement date and reduce the downside risk of the investment. A multi-period asset liability simulation model was used to generate 4000 asset return predictions, and an evolutionary algorithm, evolution strategies, was incorporated into the model to generate multi-period asset allocations under four conditions, considering different weights for measuring the importance of matching the target liability and different periods of downside risk measurement. Computational results showed that the evolutionary algorithm, evolution strategies, is a very robust and effective approach to generate promising asset allocations under all the four cases. In addition, computational results showed that the promising asset allocations revealed valuable information, which is able to help fund managers or investors achieve a higher average investment return or a lower level of volatility under different conditions.
The core purpose of pension funds is to serve as an attractive form of savings for employees with the ultimately goal of providing them with benefit payments when they have ended their active income earning careers. There are two types of pension plans: defined contribution (DC) and defined benefit (DB). There has recently been a rapid trend of employees around the world shifting from the DB scheme to the DC scheme with an increasing number of the new workforce joining defined contribution schemes. A DC pension plan is relatively simple; each participant accumulates his contributions and investment returns in a distinct personal pension account. Typically, a longer tenure is associated with a greater probability of being better rewarded in a DB plan. Under the DC scheme, employers transfer the pension fund investment risk to the employees. Such a scheme usually performs very badly in periods of high inflation because wages and salaries rise as fast as or faster than prices, whereas the value of funds often does not. No one knows if the DC plan will be able to provide a good pension benefit when the day of retirement arrives. Therefore, it is essential for the employees to choose optimal investment strategies during the accumulation phase so that they will have sufficient funds accumulated on retirement. The traditional single-period mean–variance (MV) approach (Markowitz, 1959) has dominated the portfolio selection process in the investment management profession for over a decade (Sharpe and Tint, 1990, Wilkie, 1985, Wise, 1984a, Wise, 1984b, Wise, 1987a, Wise, 1987b and Sherris, 1992). The MV approach is applied to single period investments and solves the problem of single-period asset allocation under a restrictive set of assumptions; however, this method is not suitable for a long-term investments, where multi-period asset allocation is more appropriate, since holding the same proportions of assets for thirty years may have a lower average investment return or a higher volatility than a so called “life cycle” or “top–down” investment strategy. In addition, the MV approach has the disadvantage of being a single-point forecast. A different mean and variance of the forecast may result in very different asset allocations (Chopra and Ziemba, 1993 and Koskosidis and Duarte, 1997). Merton introduced a multi-period context of portfolio strategy (Merton, 1971 and Merton, 1990) and his dynamic programming (DP) technique is widely applied to the financial optimization in a continuous-time model (Basak and Shapiro, 2001, Battocchio and Menoncin, 2004, Cuoco and Cvitanic, 1998, Devolder et al., 2003, Gerrard et al., 2004, Haberman and Sung, 2005, Haberman and Vigna, 2002, Hipp and Taksar, 2000, Josa-Fombellida and Rincon-Zapatero, 2004, Lioui and Poncet, 2001 and Yiu, 2004). However, it is sometimes difficult to apply this technique to realistic problems because it generally needs very strong assumptions to obtain closed-form solutions in a continuous-time model. For example, if, according to some regulations, the weight of a specific asset must be lower than a specified proportion of the portfolio, say 50%, then the DP technique will not be able to attain a closed-form solution. It is even more difficult to consider more complicated constraints such as the monitoring of downside risk. In addition, a multi-period context of portfolio strategy in a discrete-time model normally leads to sets of recursive equations (Huang & Cairns, 2004). The difficulty of applying constraints further increases in discrete-time models and prevents the DP technique from being applicable in realistic problems. Simulation techniques, such as the dynamic financial analysis system, have been a commonly used tool for financial analysis, and it certainly is an appropriate tool to deal with the DC pension plan problem. It allows users to take into consideration all kinds of constraints to simulate real world problems and helps users make appropriate decisions under different conditions. Although simulation techniques are powerful, it usually generates decisions by employing users’ professional knowledge and the trial-and-error method and cannot guarantee promising solutions. Therefore, the approach of integrating simulation techniques with optimization methods is valuable for researchers and practitioners to conduct financial analysis. Furthermore, since simulation models for financial analysis can be very complicated, optimization methods should be carefully chosen and properly applied so that promising decisions can be obtained. Lately, evolutionary algorithms have become the most important techniques for optimization problems. The SCI and SSCI database contains more than ten thousand technical papers developed in the past decade that have reported successful applications of evolutionary algorithms in many different research fields. Several of the papers applied genetic algorithms to solve portfolio optimization problems: Abiyev and Menekay, 2007, Baglioni et al., 2000, Chan et al., 2002, Chang et al., 2000, Chang et al., 2009, Oh et al., 2005, Lin and Ko, 2009 and Yang, 2006. To our knowledge, the papers of Baglioni et al., 2000, Chan et al., 2002 and Yang, 2006 were the only research papers considering simulation models for multi-period asset allocation and applied basic genetic algorithms to determine effective asset allocations. However, all the applications were in some ways preliminary; therefore, in this research an evolutionary algorithm, evolution strategies, is chosen to be integrated with simulation models for the thorough investigation of the DC pension plan problem. We developed a multi-period discrete-time asset liability simulation model and integrated an evolution strategies algorithm with the model to generate a DC pension plan that can match a target liability and decrease the downside risk. For the purpose of illustration, Wilkie’s investment model is adopted (Wilkie, 1995) to simulate a representative set of equal-probability plausible scenarios of future returns. Each scenario represents one possible uncertain return over the planning horizon. A large set of scenarios is generated to adequately represent highly unlikely market swings, and the proposed simulation optimized approach is applied to obtain a promising investment strategies. In this research, 4000 equal-probability scenarios of returns in 40 years were generated for the simulation model, and the proposed approach was applied to generate investment strategies under conditions considering different weights for measuring the importance of matching the target liability and the period to reduce downside risk. Computational results showed that the proposed approach is effective for finding promising investment strategies to match the target liability and decrease the downside risk during the accumulation phase in a DC plan. In addition, the investment strategies generated under different conditions provide valuable information for fund managers or investors to make proper decisions under different conditions. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes our asset liability management models for pension funds. Section 3 introduces the evolution strategies algorithm and explains how the algorithm is applied to generate promising multi-period asset allocations to achieve the objectives of the models. The computational results are discussed in Sections 4 and 5 concludes some findings in this paper.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
This paper proposed a simulation optimization approach to analyze and solve the problems of portfolio selection by applying multi-period asset allocation for a practical objective function, considering both asset–liability matching at the retirement date and the frequency of checking downside risk. Computational results showed that with the plausible simulation of future predictive returns, this simulation optimization approach, using a powerful optimization algorithm (evolution strategies), is able to find promising multi-period asset investment strategies that avoid the disadvantage of being highly sensitive to the single-point forecast. In addition, computational results showed that the promising multi-period investment strategies revealed useful information, which is able to help fund managers or investors achieve a higher average investment return or a lower level of volatility under different conditions. Furthermore, with regular monitoring of downside risk, risk-seeking fund managers or investors are able to further enhance their investment performance. Since simulation techniques have been a commonly used tool for financial analysis, the proposed simulation optimization approach can be easily applied to solve other financial problems. Computational burden may be a barrier for researchers and practitioners to apply this simulation optimization approach, so finding a way to improve efficiency of the approach is worthwhile.