علیت بین مصرف انرژی و رشد اقتصادی در ترکیه
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|11011||2008||5 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید|
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله تقریباً شامل 3600 کلمه می باشد.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Energy Policy, Volume 36, Issue 10, October 2008, Pages 3838–3842
This paper applies the causality test to examine the causal relationship between primary energy consumption (EC) and real Gross National Product (GNP) for Turkey during 1970–2006. We employ unit root tests, the augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) and the Philips–Perron (PP), Johansen cointegration test, and Pair-wise Granger causality test to examine relation between EC and GNP. Our empirical results indicate that the two series are found to be non-stationary. However, first differences of these series lead to stationarity. Further, the results indicate that EC and GNP are cointegrated and there is bidirectional causality running from EC to GNP and vice versa. This means that an increase in EC directly affects economic growth and that economic growth also stimulates further EC. This bidirectional causality relationship between EC and GNP determined for Turkey at 1970–2006 period is in accordance with the ones in literature reported for similar countries. Consequently, we conclude that energy is a limiting factor to economic growth in Turkey and, hence, shocks to energy supply will have a negative impact on economic growth.
Turkey is a country in the process of development and its economy has undergone structural reforms since the beginning of the millennium in order to realize a sustainable development. Turkey is led by a strong political leadership in the last 5 years, which is not typical for the country. As a result of this political stability, Turkey has been ranked 20th in 2006 by its 378.4 billion dollars of Gross Domestic Product based on IMF's world's economic outlook. Turkey has an important geopolitical status in the world. Indeed, it has been estimated that a great part of the world energy consumption (EC), which is expected to increase by 60% in the next 25 years, will be met from the region, which also includes Turkey. About 75% of world's oil and natural gas reserves are in Middle-East, Europe, Russia and Central-Asia. Reserves in Central-Asia come to the fore as an alternative source for meeting the world's energy demand. Turkey is both in a bridge and an outlet position for transporting the production in Central-Asia to world markets because of its geographical and geopolitical location. Turkey, being in the process of economical growth and development, has an increasing energy need. Being the basic input that facilitates economical growth and development, energy has a strategic role in Turkey. Nevertheless, Turkey has to meet a great part of its energy need from abroad. Naturally, increases in energy costs result in significant cost increases for Turkey. Total primary EC in Turkey and data from economical development over the years are given in Fig. 1. In both drawings of Fig. 1, similar up and downs are remarkable. Here, it would not be wrong to reach the conclusion that increases or decreases in Turkey's economical figures are related to increases or decreases in EC.Of Turkey's primary energy supply of 92,392 mtoe in 2006, share of domestic energy sources is 28.83%, while that of imports is 71.17%. In addition, the biggest share in energy supply belongs to oil (35.62%) followed by natural gas (27.55%), hard coal (13.65%) and lignite (11.98%) (Table 1). Foreign currency spent on energy import by Turkey has been growing. Turkey spent 5.9 billions US dollars annually for energy import in 1996–2006 period, and this figure has reached to 28.6 billions US dollars in 2006, increasing about five-fold (Türkyılmaz, 2007).On the other hand, Turkey's population has increased two-fold and EC has increased four-fold while EC per capita has increased two-fold. Rate of EC increase is higher than the population increase rate in both Turkey and the world. However, increase in EC per capita in Turkey is higher than the world average (ITU, 2007). Increase in EC as a result of the population growth, urbanization and industrialization results in major environmental problems as in many other countries. Furthermore, Turkey has announced that she will sign the Kyoto Protocol. Therefore, Turkey has to develop policies toward replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy sources for a sustainable development in the long run. Studies have been conducted into the energy supply security from a sustainability, economical efficiency and environmental point of view. A new institution called Energy Market Regulatory Authority (EMRA) has recently been established. Some important oil and natural gas pipelines are being installed and they will improve Turkey's energy supply security and will make Turkey an energy corridor between East and West. While maintaining its fast economical growth and development process, Turkey aims to fully exploit its domestic hard coal and lignite reserves, hydro and other renewable resources such as wind and solar energy. Besides, Turkey is planning to build nuclear power plants in order to meet its future energy demands. Nuclear power plants of 4500 MW capacity are being planned in order to close the energy gap in 2020. In addition to all these, considering the dynamic growth process in Turkish economy, there is a need for investigations that study the relationship between economical growth and EC for guiding the long-term energy policies to be developed by Turkey. On the other hand, in order to determine the changes in the direction of the relationship between economical growth and EC that occur in the process, current studies that comprise of timely data are necessary. There are some studies that deal with the relationship between economical growth and EC for Turkey. Soytas et al. (2001) found unidirectional causality relationship from EC to GDP at 1960–1995 period. Soytas and Sarı (2003) reported a similar result for 1950–1992 period. In their studies, Soytas et al. (2001) used cointegration analysis method, while Soytas and Sarı (2003) used VECM method. On the other hand, time periods studied in both studies are alike. In the starting years of both studies (1950–1960) there were not drastic changes in major economical aspects of Turkey. Therefore, it is not surprising that both studies found similar causality relationships between EC and economical growth. Lise and Montfort (2007) found a unidirectional relationship from economical growth to EC at 1970–2003 period. OLS and ECM methods were used. The period studied in this study is especially important, because Turkey followed an economical policy open to the world after 1980. Economical growth was more prominent at the period studied by Lise and Montfort (2007). The finding that economical growth increases EC reflects the characteristic of the period studied. Studies conducted for 1950–2000 period by Altınay and Karagöl (2004) and for 1960–2003 period by Jobert and Karanfil (2007) indicated that there were no relationships between economical growth and EC in Turkey. Altınay and Karagöl (2004) employed unit root and causality test in their studies. They reported that there was a structural breaking in data from pre-1970 period, and these breaking results in some problems in the analyses. Jobert and Karanfil (2007) employed cointegration and Granger causality methods in their studies. They used the logarithmic form of the variables they studied. Lack of a causality relationship between economical growth and EC in those two studies is due to the fact that they disregarded the structural breakings in Turkish economy in the studied periods, because these results were not expected for Turkish economy, which was in the process of development. Thus, it can be said that different results from the studies that deal with economical growth and EC in Turkey could be due to the transformations experienced in development process of Turkish economy during the periods studied. Aim of the present investigation was to study the effect of the economical reforms in Turkish economy implemented in 2001 on the causality relationship between economical growth and EC through considering the 1970–2006 period for Turkey. The studied period is important in that it can show that effects of the economical reforms on the causality relationship and that it can yield beneficial data that can be used to form the new energy policies of Turkey. No doubt that there is a need for other studies to be carried out with new data in the future.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
The study has investigated the causality relationship between energy consumption (EC) and economic growth in Turkey during the period of 1970–2006. Granger causality test was used to examine the causal relationship between EC and economic growth. Prior to testing for causality, the ADF and PP unit root tests and Johansen cointegration rank test were used to examine unit roots and cointegration. Our results seem to significantly reject the neutrality hypothesis that energy is neutral to growth. Our estimation results indicate that there is a bidirectional relationship running from EC to economic growth and from economic growth to EC. That is, an increase in EC raises economic growth and vice versa. This result is different from the results of previous studies, which investigate the causality relationship between EC and economical growth. A bidirectional relationship between economical growth and EC is inevitable for Turkey, which is in a rapidly industrializing and developing process. A bidirectional relationship between economical growth and EC has also been reported for emerging economies like Turkey (Table 1). Our findings empirically support such a relationship. Indeed, economical growth promotes EC at the beginning. Technological development caused by economical growth, on the other hand, brings new energy sources to the fore, which in turn accelerates the pace of economical growth. Because of Turkey's dependence on external sources for energy, it is clear that any problem or crisis in energy supply can negatively affect the development. Thus, Turkey's energy policies should be such that they should diminish the country's dependency for external energy sources. In conclusion, Turkey should meet its energy requirements essentially from national sources. Policies that take the environmental considerations into account should be implemented in this economical growth process with massive EC. Policies that provide supply security should also be put into practice, which is critical because of Turkey's geographic and geopolitical location.