دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 146164
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

چرخه زندگی برای به دست آوردن اعتبار بتن در سیستم امتیاز ستاره سبز در استرالیا

عنوان انگلیسی
Life cycle costing for obtaining concrete credits in green star rating system in Australia
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
146164 2018 8 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 172, 20 January 2018, Pages 4212-4219

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
هزینه چرخه زندگی، اعتبار بتن سیستم امتیاز ستاره سبز، تجزیه و تحلیل میزان حساسیت، استرالیا،
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Life cycle costing; Concrete credits; Green star rating system; Sensitivity analysis; Australia;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  چرخه زندگی برای به دست آوردن اعتبار بتن در سیستم امتیاز ستاره سبز در استرالیا

چکیده انگلیسی

Cement is one of the widely used materials in construction. Due to the adverse impacts towards the environment from cement manufacturing, green building rating tools always give a significant consideration towards concrete usage in green buildings. Irrespective of its significance in green buildings, there is a clear lack of research on life-cycle cost (LCC) impact of using supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in cement as required by green building rating tools. Therefore, this research analyses the life cycle costs of concrete using SCMs in obtaining concrete credits according to Green Star rating system in Australia. This research used fly ash, slag and silica fume as SCM for concrete. The SCM replacement percentage in concrete ranges from 10% to 60% as higher than 60% substitution is impractical. This research calculated LCC for each replacement percentage and specific building elements in different strength categories. LCC of concrete decreases with higher SCM replacement percentages. Further, there are only slight differences in LCC when comparing the three SCMs. In LCC, the contribution from the initial material cost is approximately 85%–87%, and in an exceptional situation such as in columns, this lowers to 66%. In larger columns, the cost of demolition is greater than that of the initial cost whereas it contributed to 61%–68% of the LCC.