انتخاب تامین کننده در دراز مدت با استفاده از روش MCDM فازی ترکیب شده: یک مطالعه موردی در یک شرکت مخابراتی
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|19163||2009||9 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید|
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله تقریباً شامل 7172 کلمه می باشد.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
|شرح||تعرفه ترجمه||زمان تحویل||جمع هزینه|
|ترجمه تخصصی - سرعت عادی||هر کلمه 90 تومان||11 روز بعد از پرداخت||645,480 تومان|
|ترجمه تخصصی - سرعت فوری||هر کلمه 180 تومان||6 روز بعد از پرداخت||1,290,960 تومان|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Expert Systems with Applications, Volume 36, Issue 2, Part 2, March 2009, Pages 3887–3895
With the globalization and the emergence of the extended enterprise of interdependent organizations, there has been a steady increase in the outsourcing of parts and services. This has led firms to give more importance to the purchasing function and its associated decisions. Since these decisions require a long term investment for the telecommunication industry especially and affect the strategic positioning of the companies in the sector, the selection of the proper supplier is one of the most important problems. Supplier selection is a multi-criteria problem which includes both tangible and intangible factors. This paper develops a supplier evaluation approach based on the analytic network process (ANP) and the technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) methods to help a telecommunication company in the GSM sector in Turkey under the fuzzy environment where the vagueness and subjectivity are handled with linguistic terms parameterized by triangular fuzzy numbers. Contrary to conventional Fuzzy ANP (FANP) methodology in the literature, we use triangular fuzzy numbers in all pairwise comparison matrices in the FANP. Hence, criteria weights are calculated as the triangular fuzzy numbers and then these fuzzy criteria weights are inserted to the fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to rank the alternatives. This approach is demonstrated with a real world case study involving six main evaluation criteria that the company has determined to choose the most appropriate supplier. The study was followed by the sensitivity analyses of the results.
Supplier selection process is one of the most important components of production and logistics management for many companies. Selection of a wrong supplier could be enough to upset the company’s financial and operational position. Selecting the right suppliers significantly reduces purchasing costs, improves competitiveness in the market and enhances end user satisfaction. The selecting process mainly involves evaluation of different alternative suppliers based on different criteria. This process is essentially considered as a multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem which is affected by different tangible and intangible criteria including price, quality, performance, technical capability, delivery, etc. A number of alternative approaches have been proposed to take these criteria into account, called mathematical programming models, multiple attribute decision aid methods, cost-based methods, statistical and probabilistic methods, combined methodologies and other methods. Hence considerable amount of studies have been developed for supplier evaluation and selection problem since 1960. Among the available multi-attribute decision-making methods, only the analytic network process (ANP) can be used to evaluate the most suitable suppliers systematically due to the dependencies and feedbacks caused by the mutual effects of the criteria. The ANP is a multi-attribute approach for decision-making that allows for the transformation of qualitative values into quantitative values and performing analysis on them. Essentially it is a more general form of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). The AHP is a special case of the ANP and it does not contain feedback loops among the factors. Hence, we selected the ANP method to calculate relative weights of criteria in our study. There are many weight calculation procedures, but the ANP has some advantages. One of the most important advantages of the ANP is based on pair-wise comparison. Furthermore it considers the dependencies and feedbacks of the criteria. However, in many problems the human assessment is uncertain, and it is relatively difficult for the decision-maker (DM) to provide exact numerical values for the criteria. Hence most of the selection parameters can not be given precisely and the evaluation data of the alternative suppliers’ suitability for various subjective criteria and the weights of the criteria are usually expressed in linguistic terms by the DMs. Furthermore, it is also recognized that human judgment on qualitative attributes is always subjective and thus imprecise. In order to model this kind of uncertainty in human preference, fuzzy logic could be a more natural approach. The ANP method deals only with crisp comparison ratios. However, uncertain human judgments with internal inconsistency obstructing the direct application of the ANP are frequently found. To cope with this problem, the fuzzy ANP (FANP) method can be used (Yu & Tzeng, 2006). Contrary to conventional FANP methodology in the literature, in our proposed method, the linguistic assessment is converted to (triangular) fuzzy numbers firstly. These triangular fuzzy numbers are used to build pair-wise comparison matrices for the ANP. In the FANP, weights are more simple to calculate than for conventional ANP. However, sometimes large number of pairwise comparisons should be performed by DMs and this situation become impractical the usage of the FANP process in some cases. To cope with this problem, fuzzy TOPSIS technique is then used to reduce the number of pairwise comparisons and to rank the alternatives in our study. The technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) (Hwang & Yoon, 1981) is a widely accepted multi-attribute decision-making technique due to its sound logic, simultaneous consideration of the ideal and the anti-ideal solutions, and easily programmable computation procedure (Karsak, 2002). This technique is based on the concept that the ideal alternative has the best level for all attributes, whereas the negative ideal is the one with all the worst attribute values. In fuzzy TOPSIS, attribute values are represented by fuzzy numbers. Using this method, the DM’s fuzzy assignments with different rating viewpoints and the trade-offs among different criteria are considered in the aggregation procedure to ensure more accurate decision-making. As mentioned before, supplier evaluation and selection has received considerable attention in the literature. Since we used the ANP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment, we only focused on the supplier selection literature related to these methods and similar approaches. The AHP is used for supplier selection problems commonly, instead of the ANP. Some examples of the supplier selection literature related to the AHP are given as follows. Ghodsypour and O’Brien (1998) proposed an integration of an AHP and linear programming to consider both tangible and intangible factors in choosing the best suppliers. Tam and Tummala (2001) proposed an AHP-based model and applied to a telecommunications company to examine its feasibility in selecting a vendor for a telecommunications system. Haq and Kannan (2006) developed an integrated supplier selection and multi-echelon distribution inventory model for the original equipment manufacturing company in a built-to-order supply chain environment using fuzzy AHP and a genetic algorithm. Pi and Low (2006) suggested a method for supplier evaluation and selection based on quality, on-time delivery, price and service. The model quantifies these four multiple criteria in terms of Taguchi quality loss and then uses an AHP to combine them into one global variable for decision-making. Chan and Kumar (2007) presented a fuzzy extended AHP-based methodology for global supplier selection. Xia and Wu (2007) proposed an integrated approach of AHP improved by rough sets theory and multi-objective mixed integer programming to simultaneously determine the number of suppliers to employ and the order quantity allocated to these suppliers in the case of multiple sourcing, multiple products, with multiple criteria and with supplier’s capacity constraints. Although the AHP has been applied to many supplier selection problems summarized above, the ANP and TOPSIS has received much less attention in the supplier selection literature. Chen, Lin, and Huang (2006) developed a hierarchy multiple criteria decision-making model based on fuzzy sets theory to deal with the supplier selection problems. Their model uses the concept of TOPSIS to determine the ranking order of all suppliers. Shyur and Shih (2006) recently developed a combined ANP and TOPSIS model for strategic vendor selection. Furthermore the FANP has also received much less attention in the all literature than the classical ANP (Büyüközkan et al., 2004, Ertay et al., 2005, Kahraman et al., 2006, Mikhailov and Singh, 2003 and Mohanty et al., 2005). Although there were a number of publications selecting the most suitable supplier alternatives in the literature and some of them have been prepared using the multi-attribute/multi-criteria decision-making methods considering human judgments, tangible, intangible and multiple criteria, there is no evidence in the literature that any of them were prepared with the aim of the selection of the suitable supplier using either the ANP or integrated ANP and TOPSIS methodology under a fuzzy environment. Our study proposes an integrated FANP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for evaluating and selecting the most suitable suppliers for a telecommunication company in the GSM sector as a real world application. Fuzzy TOPSIS is used to select a supplier alternative and the FANP is applied to calculate criteria weights. In conventional FANP methodology, DMs’ linguistic evaluations in fuzzy forms are first converted to crisp numbers by using different algorithms and then these crisp evaluations are used in the ANP to performed pairwise comparisons. Contrary to conventional FANP methodology in the literature, we use triangular fuzzy numbers in all pairwise comparison matrices through the FANP. Hence, criteria weights are calculated as the triangular fuzzy numbers and then these fuzzy criteria weights are inserted to the fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to rank the alternatives. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the contents of the ANP process. Fuzzy theory is briefly reviewed in Section 3. Sections 4 and 5 describe the basics of the FANP and fuzzy TOPSIS, respectively. Section 6 presents application of the integrated model to the supplier selection problem as a real world case study. The results of the application are discussed and some of the model parameters are evaluated with the sensitivity analysis in Section 7. In Section 8, the conclusions, main findings and contributions are drawn and future developments are suggested.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
Supplier selection process is a technique for evaluating the basic suitable companies and selecting a limited number of them by using a detailed evaluation. The objective of this study is to analyze the potential of suppliers, and to choose the best candidate by using a multi-criteria approach. If the measures are vague, the decision process begins to become difficult. For this reason, the usage of the fuzzy sets in describing uncertainties in different factors simplifies the complex structure of the decision phase. In other words, using linguistic preferences can be very useful for uncertain situations. This paper used fuzzy TOPSIS approach for supplier selection. Criteria weights are derived by using fuzzy ANP-based on pairwise comparison. The results guide companies to choose the best supplier among the candidates. For further research, developing a group decision-making system can be very useful. In this way, the opinions of different authorities can be taken into account. Also, different hierarchical and detailed objectives can be incorporated into the study. Lastly, mathematical models or meta-heuristics can be combined with the existing method.