دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 60625
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

قلب های تنها: دیدگاه های روان شناختی درباره تنهایی

عنوان انگلیسی
Lonely hearts: Psychological perspectives on loneliness
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
60625 1999 22 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Applied and Preventive Psychology, Volume 8, Issue 1, Winter 1999, Pages 1–22

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
ضمیمه؛ افسردگی؛ تفاوتهای فردی؛ تنهایی؛ آسیب شناسی روانی؛ شبکه اجتماعی؛ حمایت اجتماعی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Attachment; Depression; Individual differences; Loneliness; Psychopathology; Social network; Social support
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  قلب های تنها: دیدگاه های روان شناختی درباره تنهایی

چکیده انگلیسی

Loneliness is a complex set of feelings encompassing reactions to the absence of intimate and social needs. Although transient for some individuals, loneliness can be a chronic state for others. We review the developmental, social, personality, clinical, and counseling psychology literatures on loneliness with an emphasis on recent empirical findings. Chronic feelings of loneliness appear to have roots in childhood and early attachment processes. Chronically lonely individuals are more likely to be high in negative affectivity, act in a socially withdrawn fashion, lack trust in self and others, feel little control over success or failure, and generally be dissatisfied with their relationships compared to nonlonely individuals. Loneliness has also been associated with a variety of individual differences including depression, hostility, pessimism, social withdrawal, alienation, shyness, and low positive affect; loneliness is also a concomitant of more severe disorders, such as clinical depression, borderline personality, and schizophrenia. Although loneliness affects a large number of individuals and is associated with numerous negative outcomes, relatively few investigations have examined the efficacy of treatments aimed at alleviating or preventing loneliness. Several investigations raise the possibility of treating loneliness, but the absence of appropriate comparison groups casts doubt on the efficacy of many of these treatments. Correlational studies also suggest that one close friend or romantic partner may be sufficient to buffer those at risk for loneliness. Research on causal processes is sparse, however, and more research is needed to delineate which factors are antecedents and which are consequences of loneliness.