سرمایه گذاری مستقیم خارجی و نابرابری درآمد منطقه ای چین
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|7386||2011||6 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید|
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله تقریباً شامل 4721 کلمه می باشد.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای سایت یا وبلاگ شما
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای کتاب شما
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای نشریه یا رسانه شما
پیشنهاد می کنیم کیفیت محتوای سایت خود را با استفاده از منابع علمی، افزایش دهید.
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Economic Modelling, Volume 28, Issue 3, May 2011, Pages 1348–1353
China's widening regional income inequality coupled with its pronounced regional disparity in foreign direct investment stock since 1990 has claimed the attention of many scholars. While some researchers confirm regional disparity in China's foreign direct investment, others attribute the widening regional income inequality to this regional disparity. This paper thus assesses the impacts of China's stock of foreign direct investment on its regional income inequality using simultaneous equation model and the Shapley value regression-based decomposition approach. Our results suggest that China's stock of foreign direct investment has accounted for merely 2% of its regional income inequality. Furthermore, the contribution ratio of per capita foreign direct investment stock to China's regional income inequality has relatively been on a steady decline since 2002. The decomposition results also reveal that provincial per capita physical assets account for over 50% of the nation's income inequality and 65% of the increases in income inequality since 1990. The other two important determinants of regional income inequality are province location and educational level. However, educational level is found to have a decreasing effect on regional income inequality.
China's rapid economic growth has been marked by growing regional income inequality. A number of studies indicate that the widening regional income inequality observed in China has serious consequences on its GDP growth (Qin et al., 2009 and Sicular et al., 2007). One source of China's widening gap in regional income has been attributed to the vast disparity in regional distribution of foreign direct investment (FDI) stock. A number of studies suggest that the country's stock of foreign direct investment has substantially contributed to its overall trade and GDP growth (Chen et al., 1995, Francoise, 2000, Zhang, 2001, Liu et al., 2002 and Whalley and Xin, 2010). China has received an increasing amount of FDI stock, however, a large majority of the stock have gone to the developed coastal regions (Whalley and Xin, 2010 and Yu et al., 2008). In addition, another strand of literature further confirms that China's foreign direct investment stock has significantly promoted economic development in the country's coastal provinces, while it has had slight impacts on GDP growth in the western provinces (Fujita and Hu, 2001, Demurger, 2001, Sun and Parikh, 2001, Demurger et al., 2002, Wen, 2003 and Fu, 2004). This raises question about whether or not the disparity in China's regional FDI stock has led to the widening regional per capita income inequality. This paper thus assesses the impacts of China's regional stock of foreign direct investment on its regional income inequality. To begin with, it is necessary to note the relationship between China's FDI inflows and its GDP growth. However, the traditional approach that uses econometric methods to regress GDP (or GDP growth) on the stock of FDI and other variables (as used by Berthelemy and Demurger, 2000, Borensztein et al., 1998, Graham and Wada, 2001 and Chen et al., 1995Liu et al., 2002, Wei, 1993, Wu, 2000 and Dees, 1998) may yield biased coefficient estimates. Alternatively, we use the simultaneous equation model to overcome the problem of endogeneity and then employ the most recently developed Shapley value decomposition approach to obtain the net impacts of FDI stock on regional income disparity. Our results suggest that China's stock of FDI accounts for merely 2% of its regional income inequality. The rest of the paper is structured as follows. Section 2 briefly discusses China's FDI and its regional income inequality. In Section 3, we describe the methodology and data used, and discuss the regression and decomposition results. Section 4 focuses on conclusions and policy implications.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
In this paper, we investigate the role China's FDI stock plays in the nation's widening regional income inequality. We do this by setting up a simultaneous equation model to perform regression analysis and then decomposing the regression results using the Shapley value regression-based decomposition approach to enable us determine the impacts of FDI stock on China's regional income inequality and the associated changes. Our results suggest that the stock of FDI in China has contributed less than 2% of regional income inequality. Our decomposition results further reveal that provincial per capita physical assets account for over 50% of China's income inequality, and contribute to about 65% of the increases in income inequality between 1990 and 2005. The other two important determinants of regional income inequality in the country are province location and educational level. Educational level is however found to have the most important decreasing effect on regional income inequality. If the decomposition results are acceptable, our results thus imply that FDI stock should not be viewed as the cause of China's widening regional income inequality. If the Chinese government's first priority is to fight widening regional income inequality, extra efforts are needed to diversify domestic physical and human capital investments into the Western provinces. Reductions in the pronounced regional disparity in these two types of capital will significantly help to reduce the nation's regional income inequality.