دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 143294
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

روش های پیشرفته برای تعیین اولویت سلامتی از طریق سهم تئوری سیستم: درس های مطالعه موردی در اتیوپی

عنوان انگلیسی
Advancing methods for health priority setting practice through the contribution of systems theory: Lessons from a case study in Ethiopia
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
143294 2018 43 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Social Science & Medicine, Volume 198, February 2018, Pages 165-174

پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  روش های پیشرفته برای تعیین اولویت سلامتی از طریق سهم تئوری سیستم: درس های مطالعه موردی در اتیوپی

چکیده انگلیسی

Setting priorities for health services is a complex and value laden process. Over the past twenty years, there has been considerable scholarly attention paid to strengthening fairness and legitimacy using the prominent ethical framework, Accountability for Reasonableness (A4R). A variety of case studies applying A4R have advanced our conceptual understanding of procedural fairness, and have highlighted the significance of context through its application. There is a paucity of research, however, that rigorously examines how and to what extent context influences health priority setting processes and the establishment of procedural fairness. We argue here that to study context rigorously requires taking a holistic view of the system by examining the dynamics and interrelationships within it. Using the Transformative Systems Change Framework (TSCF), this investigation sought to examine the influence of system factors on priority setting practice and procedural fairness. A qualitative case study of Ethiopian district health planning was undertaken in 2010 and 2011. Methods included 58 qualitative interviews with decision makers, participant observation, and document analysis. Data analysis followed in three phases: i) an inductive analysis of district health priority setting to highlight experiences across each of the three districts selected, ii) deductive analysis applying A4R and the TSCF independently; and iii) a synthesis of concepts of priority setting practice and procedural fairness within a broader, theoretical understanding of the system. Through the application of the TSCF, a nuanced understanding of priority setting practice is revealed that situates this process within a system of interdependent components that include: norms, operations, regulations, and resources. This paper offers a practical guide attuned to system features influencing the design, implementation, and sustainability of greater fairness in health priority setting practice.