دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 86316
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

سیستم آبرسانی گارانی، بسیار در حال حاضر، اما نه بالا مشخصات: تجزیه و تحلیل هیدرولیستی از نظارت بر آب های زیرزمینی در سطح بین المللی

عنوان انگلیسی
The Guarani Aquifer System, highly present but not high profile: A hydropolitical analysis of transboundary groundwater governance
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
86316 2018 9 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Environmental Science & Policy, Volume 83, May 2018, Pages 54-62

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
گوارانی، سیستم آبرسانی گوارانی، حکومت آب زیرزمینی، هیدروپولتیک، هژمونی هیدروژنی،
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Guarani; Guarani Aquifer System; Groundwater governance; Hydropolitics; Hydro-hegemony;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  سیستم آبرسانی گارانی، بسیار در حال حاضر، اما نه بالا مشخصات: تجزیه و تحلیل هیدرولیستی از نظارت بر آب های زیرزمینی در سطح بین المللی

چکیده انگلیسی

This article explores the governance of the Guarani Aquifer System (GAS) through the lens of critical hydropolitics and specifically through the framework of hydro-hegemony. This study is important as the GAS, which is one of the first examples of transboundary groundwater cooperation, has been studied through hydrological, geological and legal disciplinary approaches, but hydropolitical analyses of the issues raised in cooperation of this resource is still lacking. While a hydrological analysis of the GAS is important, it is not enough to comprehend and make sense of the governance and political agreements among the countries. For this reason, this article complements the existing studies on the hydrological, geological, and legal analyses published on this aquifer. By taking the case study of the GAS, this article makes important empirical contributions to the study of transboundary groundwater cooperation. This article argues that through critical hydropolitics, and in particular by consideration of the power asymmetries between states and their exploitation potential of groundwater, it is possible to more accurately understand the current water governance’s arrangements around the GAS. It also argues that critical hydropolitics fails to explain informal cooperation arrangements in the case of the GAS.