دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 129686
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

انجمن های طولانی از نگرش های خشونت شریک صمیمانه و انجام: داده های زوج های زوجین از یک پرونده کنترل تصادفی در هند روستایی

عنوان انگلیسی
Longitudinal associations of intimate partner violence attitudes and perpetration: Dyadic couples data from a randomized controlled trial in rural India
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
129686 2017 32 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Social Science & Medicine, Volume 179, April 2017, Pages 97-105

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
خشونت شریک صمیمی، هنجارهای اجتماعی، هند، آزمایش تصادفی کنترل شده، نگرش های، اطلاعات زوج سطح،
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Intimate partner violence; Social norms; India; Randomized controlled trial; Attitudes; Couples level data;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  انجمن های طولانی از نگرش های خشونت شریک صمیمانه و انجام: داده های زوج های زوجین از یک پرونده کنترل تصادفی در هند روستایی

چکیده انگلیسی

We conducted longitudinal analyses examining the associations between intimate partner violence (IPV) attitudes and women's reported IPV in couples (N = 762) using 3 waves of data from a randomized controlled trial in Maharashtra, India. We found that, between Waves 1 and 2, men's and women's acceptance of IPV in the overall population decreased significantly while reports of IPV increased. These changes, we hypothesize, are evidence of an exogenous shock, possibly a high profile rape in Delhi in December 2012, that may have impacted the entire population. Cross-sectional associations between men's attitudes towards IPV and reported IPV were not significant in Wave 1, while positively and significantly associated in Waves 2 and 3. Longitudinal analysis showed that reduction in men's acceptance of IPV between Waves 1 and 2 was associated with a lower likelihood of reported IPV in Wave 3. Women's Wave 1 acceptance of IPV was positively associated with reported IPV in the Wave 1 cross-sectional analysis, while Wave 2 and Wave 3 measures of IPV acceptance were negatively associated with reported IPV in Waves 2 and 3 respectively. Longitudinal analyses of the change in women's attitudes towards IPV from Wave 1 to 2 and reported IPV in Wave 3 were insignificant. However, When women first reported IPV in Waves 2 or 3 they were less likely to report acceptance of IPV in that same wave. Findings suggest that changes in husbands' IPV acceptance is predictive of subsequent IPV, while newly experienced IPV predicts decreased IPV acceptance for women. Wave 2 and Wave 3 results were significant for the control group only, evidence that the intervention affected those associations, potentially changing attitudes more quickly than behavior. We recommend interventions that expose community opposition to IPV as a new social norm, and analysis of how the 2012 Delhi rape case may have affected these norms.