دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 70788
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

اعتبار اقدامات بیمار و رتبه بالینی از نیازها و رابطه درمانی در روان پریشی: تجزیه و تحلیل مخلوط

عنوان انگلیسی
The validity of patient- and clinician-rated measures of needs and the therapeutic relationship in psychosis: A pooled analysis
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
70788 2013 10 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Psychiatry Research, Volume 209, Issue 3, 30 October 2013, Pages 711–720

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
نتایج ارزیابی؛ روایی همگرا؛ تشخیص اعتبار؛ اعتبار سنجی چنددرمان/چند روش؛ عواقب گزارش بیمار
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Outcome assessment; Convergent validity; Discriminant validity; Multitrait-multimethod validation; Patient-reported outcomes
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  اعتبار اقدامات بیمار و رتبه بالینی از نیازها و رابطه درمانی در روان پریشی: تجزیه و تحلیل مخلوط

چکیده انگلیسی

Measuring outcomes of treatments for psychosis such as needs and the quality of the therapeutic relationship is important in research and routine care. However, evidence on the validity of existing outcome measures is limited. We aimed to test the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of two widely used patient- and clinician-rated measures of needs and the therapeutic relationship. Multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analysis was conducted on the Camberwell Assessment of Need Short Appraisal Schedule (CANSAS) and the Helping Alliance Scale (HAS), both the clinician (CANSAS-C, HAS-C) and patient (CANSAS-P, HAS-P) versions, in a pooled sample of 605 psychotic patients and their clinicians. CANSAS-C and CANSAS-P items loaded substantially into one common unmet needs factor. By comparison, substantial factor loadings were found for HAS-C and HAS-P items on two separate clinician- and patient-rated therapeutic relationship factors. Common unmet needs and clinician-rated therapeutic relationship factors significantly predicted reduced psychiatric in-patient days. Our findings support the convergent validity of the CANSAS, discriminant validity of the HAS, and predictive validity of CANSAS and HAS-C. The findings may inform the use of CANSAS and HAS as psychosis outcome measures in research and routine care.