دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 77440
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

پیش بینی و سازگاری متقابل موقعیتی رفتار روزانه در سراسر فرهنگها: آزمایش خصلتی و دیدگاه روانشناسی فرهنگی

عنوان انگلیسی
Prediction and cross-situational consistency of daily behavior across cultures: Testing trait and cultural psychology perspectives ☆
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
77440 2008 17 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Journal of Research in Personality, Volume 42, Issue 5, October 2008, Pages 1199–1215

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
میان فرهنگی؛ ثبات؛ روانشناسی خصلتی؛ روانشناسی فرهنگی؛ رفتار روزانه
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Cross-cultural; Consistency; Trait psychology; Cultural psychology; Daily behavior
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  پیش بینی و سازگاری متقابل موقعیتی رفتار روزانه در سراسر فرهنگها: آزمایش خصلتی و دیدگاه روانشناسی فرهنگی

چکیده انگلیسی

Trait and cultural psychology perspectives on the cross-situational consistency of behavior, and the predictive validity of traits, were tested in a daily process study in the United States (N = 68), an individualistic culture, and the Philippines (N = 80), a collectivistic culture. Participants completed the Revised NEO Personality Inventory [Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources] and a measure of self-monitoring, then reported their daily behaviors and associated situational contexts for approximately 30 days. Consistent with trait perspectives, the Big Five traits predicted daily behaviors in both cultures, and relative (interindividual) consistency was observed across many, although not all, situational contexts. The frequency of various Big Five behaviors varied across relevant situational contexts in both cultures and, consistent with cultural psychology perspectives, there was a tendency for Filipinos to exhibit greater situational variability than Americans. Self-monitoring showed some ability to account for individual differences in situational variability in the American sample, but not the Filipino sample.