دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 57204
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

تعاملات توسعه تکنولوژی انرژی و بهره برداری انرژی نو با توسعه فن آوری آب در چین

عنوان انگلیسی
Interactions of energy technology development and new energy exploitation with water technology development in China
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
57204 2011 7 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Energy, Volume 36, Issue 12, December 2011, Pages 6960–6966

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
کاهش CO2 - فواید مشترک؛ انرژی و صرفه جویی در آب؛ مدل های ورودی خروجی؛ انرژی نو - پیشرفت تکنولوژی
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
CO2 mitigation; Co-benefits; Energy and water saving; Input–output model; New energy; Technology development
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  تعاملات توسعه تکنولوژی انرژی و بهره برداری انرژی نو با توسعه فن آوری آب در چین

چکیده انگلیسی

Interactions of energy policies with water technology development in China are investigated using a hybrid input-output model and scenario analysis. The implementation of energy policies and water technology development can produce co-benefits for each other. Water saving potential of energy technology development is much larger than that of new energy exploitation. From the viewpoint of proportions of water saving co-benefits of energy policies, energy sectors benefit the most. From the viewpoint of proportions of energy saving and CO2 mitigation co-benefits of water technology development, water sector benefits the most. Moreover, economic sectors are classified into four categories concerning co-benefits on water saving, energy saving and CO2 mitigation. Sectors in categories 1 and 2 have big direct co-benefits. Thus, they can take additional responsibility for water and energy saving and CO2 mitigation. If China implements life cycle materials management, sectors in category 3 can also take additional responsibility for water and energy saving and CO2 mitigation. Sectors in category 4 have few co-benefits from both direct and accumulative perspectives. Thus, putting additional responsibility on sectors in category 4 might produce pressure for their economic development.