دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی شماره 130879
ترجمه فارسی عنوان مقاله

درگیری های همسایگی، نابرابری های اجتماعی-فضایی و محرومیت های مسکونی در سانتیاگو، شیلی

عنوان انگلیسی
Neighbourhood conflicts, socio-spatial inequalities, and residential stigmatisation in Santiago, Chile
کد مقاله سال انتشار تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
130879 2018 8 صفحه PDF
منبع

Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)

Journal : Cities, Volume 74, April 2018, Pages 75-82

ترجمه کلمات کلیدی
مناقشه همسایه، نابرابری اجتماعی و فضایی، خشونت خانوادگی، پیوست محل
کلمات کلیدی انگلیسی
Neighbourhood conflict; Socio-spatial inequalities; Residential stigmatisation; Place attachment;
پیش نمایش مقاله
پیش نمایش مقاله  درگیری های همسایگی، نابرابری های اجتماعی-فضایی و محرومیت های مسکونی در سانتیاگو، شیلی

چکیده انگلیسی

This paper addresses the complex relationship between social inequality and urban conflict by offering a systematic and comprehensive approach to the articulation between macro structural inequality (density, segregation, concentration of high-income), meso level symbolic inequality (territorial stigma) and micro level experiences of conflict and place attachment. We contend that micro-social, neighbourhood level conflicts -mistakenly understood as ‘neighbourhood nuisances’ (e.g. noise, odours, parking)- are associated with larger scale urban conflicts. We also argue that the development of affective ties with the neighbourhood in which they reside can insulate people from neighbourhood conflict, as well as helping to lessen the impact structural inequality and stigmatisation. Drawing on the results of a representative survey of 2300 individuals, carried out in Chile's capital city, Santiago, at the behest of the country's Ministry of Justice, we apply multilevel logistical regression models. The results obtained allow us to question the prevailing view that regards neighbourhood conflicts as essentially superficial and localised. Our results show that the incidence of these ‘nuisances’ is not solely associated with individual socioeconomic circumstances, suggesting that they rather form part of a common framework of intersectional vulnerabilities. We suggest that suitable responses include the promotion of active forms of interconnectedness, which empower actors and challenge the noxious effects of the neoliberal model of development.