آگاهی از نفوذ اجتماعی بر مصرف مواد غذایی. تجزیه و تحلیل از دو مطالعات تجربی
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|37292||2015||6 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید|
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله تقریباً شامل 6405 کلمه می باشد.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای سایت یا وبلاگ شما
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای کتاب شما
- تولید محتوا با مقالات ISI برای نشریه یا رسانه شما
پیشنهاد می کنیم کیفیت محتوای سایت خود را با استفاده از منابع علمی، افزایش دهید.
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : Appetite, Volume 85, 1 February 2015, Pages 165–170
There is consistent evidence that the amount of food we consume can be influenced by the eating behaviour of other people. Some previous experimental studies reported that consumers are unaware of this influence on their behaviour. The present research tested whether people may be more aware of social influence on their eating than previously assumed. In two studies, participants (total n = 160) were exposed to information about the amount of snack food other people had been eating shortly before being served the same snack food and eating as much as they liked. After this, participants responded to questions regarding whether they thought their food intake had been socially influenced, and reported the reasons why they believed they had or had not been influenced. Of the 160 participants, 34% reported that they had been influenced, 10% were unsure and 56% reported they had not been influenced. Crucially, participants' reports of social influence appeared to be accurate; the food intake of participants reporting social influence was significantly affected by the amount of food other people had been eating, whereas the food intake of participants denying social influence was unaffected. Individuals may be more aware of the effect that social influence has on their eating behaviour than previously assumed. Further work is needed to identify the factors which determine whether people are susceptible to social influence on eating behaviour.
There is robust evidence that psycho-social and environmental factors, such as the eating behaviour of other people, can strongly influence the amount of food that we eat (Hermans et al, 2010a and Robinson et al, 2014a). These effects have been shown across a variety of paradigms (McFerran et al, 2010, Prinsen et al, 2013 and Robinson et al, 2011), as well as for different foods (Feeney et al, 2011, Herman et al, 2003 and Hermans et al, 2010a) and studies have also shown that individuals will copy the eating behaviour of other people even when they are of a different weight status (Conger et al, 1980, McFerran et al, 2010 and Robinson et al, 2014b). What is less clear is whether people are aware of these types of influence on their behaviour. Given that nutrition and diet are important determinants of health, it is important to clarify the extent to which individuals are able to identify the environmental factors that shape their eating behaviour. For example, if awareness of these influences can mitigate social influence effects that promote unhealthy eating behaviour, educating people about social influence effects could reduce unhealthy eating behaviour. A relatively small number of social psychology studies have examined awareness of social influence on behaviour. Nolan, Schultz, Cialdini, Goldstein, and Griskevicius (2008) showed that although social normative beliefs about energy conservation influenced behaviour, most participants in their study did not believe that they would be influenced in this way. In two studies, Vorauer and Miller (1997) showed that individuals often fail to notice that they change their own behaviour in order to present themselves favourably to others. However, this ‘social influence blindness effect’ was not consistently seen in all participants, because some participants were aware. Some studies have specifically examined awareness of social influence on eating behaviour in experimental settings (Roth et al, 2001, Spanos et al, 2014 and Vartanian et al, 2008). These studies tended to report that although participants were strongly influenced by the eating behaviour of their co-eaters or information about what other people had been eating, they did not report or recognise this influence impacted on their behaviour (Spanos et al, 2014 and Vartanian et al, 2008). One explanation of these findings is that social influence on eating could act outside of conscious awareness (Nisbett & Wilson, 1977), whilst another is that individuals are aware but are motivated to report that they are not influenced, possibly in order to maintain or portray a sense of autonomy. On the basis of these experimental studies it has been concluded that people are unaware of social influence on their eating behaviour (e.g. Vartanian et al., 2008) and this view has been endorsed by others (e.g. Hermans, Larsen, Herman, & Engels, 2012a). However, in some studies participants have shown a degree of awareness. Although not the main interest of their study, Hermans et al. (2012a) reported that 21% of participants reported that they had adjusted their food intake in response to what a dining companion was eating. Moreover, qualitative studies which explore consumers' beliefs and experience of eating behaviour have found that people report that social context and the behaviour of those around them is an important influence on their own eating behaviour (Brug et al, 1995 and Weber Cullen et al, 2000). One possible explanation for the mixed findings to date lies in the methods that are typically used to measure awareness of social influence effects. In most studies, after participants had eaten in a social context they were not directly asked if they had been influenced by the behaviour of others. Instead, participants were asked either to spontaneously consider all the possible influences on their recent eating behaviour, or to rate an extensive list of possible influences (Spanos et al, 2014 and Vartanian et al, 2008). Arguably, one consequence of both approaches is that encouraging participants to consider a wide range of alternative influences could impede their ability to correctly identify the most appropriate or ‘correct’ answers; also known as the paradox of choice (Iyengar, Lepper, 2000 and Schwartz, 2004). Thus, it is conceivable that asking participants in this way may result in them giving greater weight to less important influences on their eating behaviour, leading them to underestimate social influence effects. Given the mixed findings from a relatively small number of studies, the present paper is focused on the reporting of social influences on eating. Given the mixed findings to date, we tentatively hypothesised that some of our participants would show awareness of social influence on eating, and that awareness would moderate the effects of social influence on eating behaviour. To test this we adopted a similar approach as in Vartanian et al. (2008) who re-analysed previously published self-report data from two experimental studies that had investigated social influences on food intake (Herman et al, 2005 and Leone et al, 2007). In the studies reported in this paper, participants were initially exposed to information about the amount of food other participants had been eating before they were given the opportunity to eat that food, and finally they were asked to rate the extent to which they believed that their food intake had been influenced by the behaviour of the other participants. If any participants reported awareness of social influence, social influence effects on food intake were compared in those who reported being aware of this social influence versus those who did not. The data for Study 1 were recently published elsewhere (but awareness of social influence effects was not the focus of that study and was not reported in the paper; Robinson et al., 2014b). Study 2 used the same experimental paradigm as Study 1, and no part of those data have been published previously.