ارزیابی جایگزین های ماشین ابزار از طریق TOPSIS اصلاح شده و ANP فازی مبتنی بر برش آلفا
|کد مقاله||سال انتشار||تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی||ترجمه فارسی|
|6197||2012||7 صفحه PDF||سفارش دهید|
نسخه انگلیسی مقاله همین الان قابل دانلود است.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله بر اساس تعداد کلمات مقاله انگلیسی محاسبه می شود.
این مقاله تقریباً شامل 5450 کلمه می باشد.
هزینه ترجمه مقاله توسط مترجمان با تجربه، طبق جدول زیر محاسبه می شود:
|شرح||تعرفه ترجمه||زمان تحویل||جمع هزینه|
|ترجمه تخصصی - سرعت عادی||هر کلمه 90 تومان||9 روز بعد از پرداخت||490,500 تومان|
|ترجمه تخصصی - سرعت فوری||هر کلمه 180 تومان||5 روز بعد از پرداخت||981,000 تومان|
Publisher : Elsevier - Science Direct (الزویر - ساینس دایرکت)
Journal : International Journal of Production Economics, Volume 140, Issue 2, December 2012, Pages 630–636
The problem of machine tool selection among available alternatives has been critical issue for most companies in fast-growing markets for a long time. In the presence of many alternatives and selection criteria, the problem becomes a multiple-criteria decision making (MCDM) machine tool selection problem. Therefore, most companies have utilized various methods to successfully carry out this difficult and time-consuming process. In this work, both of the most used MCDM methods, the modified TOPSIS and the Analytical Network Process (ANP) are introduced to present a performance analysis on machine tool selection problem. The ANP method is used to determine the relative weights of a set of the evaluation criteria, as the modified TOPSIS method is utilized to rank competing machine tool alternatives in terms of their overall performance. Furthermore, in this paper, we use a fuzzy extension of ANP, a more general form of AHP, which uses uncertain human preferences as input information in the decision-making process, because AHP cannot accommodate the variety of interactions, dependencies and feedback between higher and lower level elements. Instead of using the classical eigenvector prioritization method in AHP, only employed in the prioritization stage of ANP, a fuzzy logic method providing more accuracy on judgments is applied. The resulting fuzzy ANP enhances the potential of the conventional ANP for dealing with imprecise and uncertain human comparison judgments. The proposed approach is also applied for a real-life case in a company.
A proper machine tool selection has been very important issue for manufacturing companies due to the fact that improperly selected machine tool can negatively affect the overall performance of a manufacturing system. In addition, the outputs of manufacturing system (i.e. the rate, quality and cost) mostly depend on what kinds of properly selected and implemented machines tools are used. On the other hand, the selection of a new machine tool is a time-consuming and difficult process requiring advanced knowledge and experience and experience deeply. So, the process can be hard task for engineers and managers, and also for machine tool manufacturer or vendor, to carry out. For a proper and effective evaluation, the decision-maker may need a large amount of data to be analyzed and many factors to be considered. The decision-maker should be an expert or at least be very familiar with the specifications of machine tool to select the most suitable among the others. However, a survey conducted by (Gerrard, 1988a) reveals that the role of engineering staff in authorization for final selection is 6%, the rest belongs to middle and upper management (94%). The author also indicated the need for a simplified and practical approach for the machine selection process. Evaluating machine tool alternatives is a multiple-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem in the presence of many quantitative and qualitative attributes. So, we selected analytic network process (ANP) method, because it has been widely used for selecting the best alternative among others. In AHP, a hierarchy considers the distribution of a goal amongst the elements being compared, and judges which element has a greater influence on that goal. In reality, a holistic approach like ANP is needed if all criteria and alternatives involved are connected in a network system that accepts various dependencies. Several decision problems cannot be hierarchically structured because they involve the interactions and dependencies in higher or lower level elements. Not only does the importance of the criteria determine the importance of the alternatives as in AHP, but the importance of alternatives themselves also influences the importance of the criteria. In other words, ANP incorporates feedback and interdependent relationships among decision attributes and alternatives (Saaty, 1996). This provides a more accurate approach for modeling complex decision environment (Ayag and Özdemir, 2007 and Chung et al., 2005). Another popular MCDM method used in this study is the TOPSIS (the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) first developed by Hwang and Yoon (1981). TOPSIS bases on the concept that the best alternative should have the shortest distance from the positive-ideal solution and the farthest distance from the negative-ideal solution. Although its concept is rational and understandable, and the computation steps involved is uncomplicated, the inherent difficulty of assigning reliable subjective preferences to the criteria is worth of noting. In addition, a decision maker's requirements on evaluating machine tool alternatives always contain ambiguity and multiplicity of meaning. Furthermore, it is also recognized that human assesment on qualitative attributes is always subjective and thus imprecise. Therefore, conventional ANP seems inadequate to capture decision maker's requirements explicitly. In order to model this kind of uncertainity in human preference, fuzzy sets could be incorporated with the pairwise comparison as an extension of ANP. The fuzzy ANP approach allows a more accurate description of the decision making process. Fuzzy set theory is a mathematical theory pioneered by Zadeh (1994), designed to model the vagueness or imprecision of human cognitive processes. This theory is basically a theory of classes with non-sharp boundaries. What is important to recognize is that any crisp theory can be made fuzzy by generalizing the concept of a set within that theory to the concept of a fuzzy set (Zadeh, 1994). Fuzzy set theory and fuzzy logic have been applied in a great variety of applications, as reviewed by several authors (Klir and Yuan, 1995) and (Zimmermann, 1996). Within the broad scope of the applications of fuzzy set theory, engineering design emerges as an important activity in today's organizations that has lacked tools that manage the great amount of imprecise information that is usually encountered. In literature, we have been witnessed more studies which brings AHP and TOPSIS together to solve multiple-criteria decision making problems. Some of them recently published can be summarized as follows: aimed at improving the quality and effectiveness of decision-making in a new product introduction. They proposed a systematic decision process for selecting more rational new product ideas, and used fuzzy heuristic multi-attribute utility method for the identification of non-dominated new product candidates and a hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS method for the selection of the best new product idea. Karpak and Topcu (2010) dealt with prioritizing measures of success and the antecedents for Turkish small to medium sized manufacturing enterprises. Işıklar and Büyüközkan (2007) used AHP and TOPSIS to evaluate mobile phone options in respect to the users' preferences order. Önüt and Soner (2007) also used AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS to solve the solid waste transshipment site selection problem. Lin et al. (2008) presented a framework that integrates the AHP and TOPSIS methods to assist designers in identifying customer requirements and design characteristics, and help achieve an effective evaluation of the final design solution. Tsaur et al. (2002) applied AHP in obtaining criteria weight and TOPSIS in ranking to evaluate of airline service quality. In literature, to the best of our knowledge, we have not come across any work that both techniques, ANP and TOPSIS are used for machine tool selection. The reason could be due to the fact that ANP developed by Saaty is a newly introduced method to the world of the multiple criteria. But, there are several works that both techniques are used in various fields. Both of them are summarized as follows: proposed a hybrid model for supporting the vendor selection process in new task situations. They used both modified TOPSIS method to adopt in order to rank competing products in terms of their overall performances, and the ANP to yield the relative weights of the multiple evaluation criteria, which are obtained from the nominal group technique (NGT) with interdependence. In another work, (Petri Hallikainen et al., 2009) addressed the alignment between business processes and information technology in enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation. Since the problem considered in the study involves organizational and technical issues that are connected to each other in networked manner, the analytic network process (ANP) methodology was selected for application. In this paper, we utilize the fuzzy ANP and TOPSIS methods. The fuzzy ANP method is used to determine the relative weights of a set of the evaluation criteria, as the modified TOPSIS method is utilized to rank competing machine tool alternatives in terms of their overall performance. In this work, instead of using all the steps of the fuzzy ANP method to determine the final machine tool alternative, we integrated the fuzzy ANP with the modified TOPSIS to eliminate the time-consuming fuzzy calculations of the fuzzy ANP method. Only some steps of the fuzzy ANP method is used to weight the evaluation criteria required for the modified TOPSIS method to reflect the interdependences among them. The proposed approach is also applied for a real-life case in a company which designs and manufacturers all kinds of cutting tools for national and international markets.
نتیجه گیری انگلیسی
In this paper, we proposed an integrated approach using the modified TOPSIS and fuzzy ANP in order to carry out the following tasks: the fuzzy ANP method is used determine the relative weights of a set of criteria, as the modified TOPSIS method is utilized to rank competing conceptual design alternatives in terms of their overall performance in order to reach to the best satisfying one. Furthermore, in this work, instead of using all the steps of the fuzzy ANP method to determine the final machine tool alternative, we integrated the fuzzy ANP with the modified TOPSIS to eliminate the time-consuming fuzzy calculations of the fuzzy ANP method. Only some steps of the fuzzy ANP method to reflect the interdependences among the criteria is used to determine the weights of the evaluation criteria, required for the modified TOPSIS method. We used both methods because machine tool selection problem has been critically important for most companies for a long time. Making wrong decision in selecting the proper machine tool might put a company into risk in terms of losing market share, cost and time. The ANP method used here arrives at a synthetic score, which may be quite useful for decision-maker. The ANP methodology powered by fuzzy logic is a robust multiple criteria method to find out weights of the alternatives. It is also effective as both quantitative and qualitative characteristics can be considered simultaneously without sacrificing their relationships. The fuzzy logic is also used to model the vagueness and uncertainty of the decision-makers. Use of fuzzy logic provides to get more reliably judgments of the decision makers than the crisp-based methods. The strengths of fuzzy models are their ability to approximate very complex, multi-dimensional processes and their insensitivity to noisy data. Their identification is computationally intensive but, once established, they provide quick responses. Unfortunately, fuzzy logic calculations require a considerably time to construct and process the pairwise comparisons, if especially the number of alternatives and criteria are more. If so, software like Super-Decisions Software should be used. In addition, prescreening process could be good way of narrowing down the size of the problem. However, the approach proposed here does not consider all the possible factors and criteria associated with machine tool selection problem. The elements presented in the framework are specific to a special manufacturing organization. The proposed methodology can easily be adapted to different situations by adjusting the different levels of the hierarchy and their related attributes. On the other hand, this proposed approach can be used for any researcher and practitioner in different fields, who need a reliable tool to evaluate a set of alternatives in terms of evaluation criteria which can be determined based on what kind of the problem is deal with. In this study, the proposed methodology was also applied for a company to evaluate CNC machine tools in terms of a set of technical characteristics thought as evaluation criteria. In future research, a knowledge-based system (KBS) or expert system (ES) can be adapted to this approach to interpret the outputs automatically via a user interface. A KBS or ES creates a rule-based database to interpret the analysis results, and makes its comments using an inference engine, and presents them to the user whenever needed.